On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:29:48 -0500 (EST),
"Kyle Tucker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am I missing something fundamental about this command ?
> >
> > It appears that you missed the 'min:max' vs. 'max:min' thing on the ranges,
> > but 1) that's a common oversight, and 2) it doesn't appear to be
> > Am I missing something fundamental about this command ?
>
> It appears that you missed the 'min:max' vs. 'max:min' thing on the ranges,
> but 1) that's a common oversight, and 2) it doesn't appear to be the real
> reason you're getting nothing but warnings.
James, thanks for all this detai
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:36:55 +1100,
"Matthew Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is driving me nuts, I really needs some help.
> I'm trying to monitor some hardware statuses via SNMP.
>
Ok, I use SNMP to query about 95% of the "things" I monitor under Nagios.
It works like a cham
Title: SNMP WARNING
Hi all,
This is driving me nuts, I really needs some help.
I'm trying to monitor some hardware statuses via SNMP.
As a reference I'm using this FAQ entry http://www.nagios.org/faqs/viewfaq.php?faq_id=208
And this WIKI entry http://www.nagiosexchange.org/Wiki_Home.wi
