> I don't know if it makes a difference, and I may have missed some new
> parameters that have been added since the docs were revised, but I'm not
> sure "p" is a valid failure criterion.
According to the docs, it is.
But nevertheless, I've tried it with and without, and it doesn't
work either w
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of C. Bensend
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 7:38 PM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Service dependencies not disabling
> notifications
&
> Take a very close look at the output of "nagios -v". It happened to me
> in the past that making a small error in the servicedependency
> definitions would make Nagios discard them as "Lame service dependency"
> without counting it in the warning/error count. This is logged at the
> top and disc
On 15/04/07 10:38 PM, C. Bensend wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>
>
> nagios -v is happy with this, it does not complain about any config
> errors. However, if I kill NRPE on electron, I get an alert for
> each of the supposedly dependent services. I am absolutely at a
> loss to see why.
>
> I have be
Hey folks,
I could swear I've asked this before, but neither Google nor the
mailing list archives showed any posts. My apologies if this is
indeed a repeat, my memory flakes out sometimes.
I have a v2.8 installation on an OpenBSD machine. It was built
from source, not installed via packa
