>
>Another hack on the cluster object is to use the check_host mode of
>check_icmp. Create a link to check_icmp called check_host. Use the
>command:
>
> check_host 10.9.0.2 10.9.0.3
>
>as the check_host command for switch1 (and possibly a check_ping
>service command for switch1). As long as one of
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tedman Eng writes:
>You can approach monitoring an IP-less unmanaged switch a few ways:
> but my switches do not have an IP associated with them, being
> setup thusly:
>> From: dick
>>
>> (firewall)---(switch1)(mailserver)
>> 10.9.0.1 | 10.9.0.
IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 4:20 PM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] switch host definition: no IP
>
>
> i want some advice on if and how i should add an IP-less
> switch into my host
> definitions. the templates i'v
: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] switch host definition: no IP
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (firewall)---(switch1)(mailserver)
> 10.9.0.1 | 10
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (firewall)---(switch1)(mailserver)
> 10.9.0.1 | 10.9.0.3
> |
>(wifi AP)
> 10.9.0.2
>
> in this case, would i want to make a host named switch1 and have it be the
> parent of the mailserver an
i want some advice on if and how i should add an IP-less switch into my host
definitions. the templates i've found for switches always have an IP associated
with them, like so:
define host{
use generic-host
host_name switch1
alias