> On 8/28/13 14:43, C. Bensend wrote:
>> Are you saying I just need gearmand running on the collector?
>
> Well, i assumed it. You are the only one which really can tell that.
> You will need a worker on each host which should run checks. If your
> collector should not run any checks, than no work
On 8/28/13 14:43, C. Bensend wrote:
> Are you saying I just need gearmand running on the collector?
Well, i assumed it. You are the only one which really can tell that.
You will need a worker on each host which should run checks. If your
collector should not run any checks, than no worker is neces
> On 8/22/13 13:51, C. Bensend wrote:
>> CRITICAL: Return code of 127 is out of bounds. Make sure the plugin
>> youre trying to run actually exists. (worker: collector.domain.org)
>
> Hi,
>
> if this is the collector host, why does it have a mod-gearman worker
> installed? If nagios would have
> r
On 8/22/13 13:51, C. Bensend wrote:
> CRITICAL: Return code of 127 is out of bounds. Make sure the plugin
> youre trying to run actually exists. (worker: collector.domain.org)
Hi,
if this is the collector host, why does it have a mod-gearman worker installed?
If nagios would have
run the check b
> Do you get many of those error messages in the logs at once, or just
> one at a time?
>
> Only one thought: what are the permissions on your $USER$ variables?
> Nagios on my systems setuid() to nonroot after startup, and if it gets
> SIGHUP to reload config, but can't read the file defining $USE
Do you get many of those error messages in the logs at once, or just
one at a time?
Only one thought: what are the permissions on your $USER$ variables?
Nagios on my systems setuid() to nonroot after startup, and if it gets
SIGHUP to reload config, but can't read the file defining $USER*$,
will ac
>I'm continuing to iron out the wrinkles with 3.5.1 and distributed
> monitoring. I'm using mod_gearman to submit and receive events from
> two distributed pollers.
>
>Every now and again, I'll get something similar in the log on the
> centralized collecting machine:
>
> CRITICAL: Return
Hi
Thanks Dan!
I'm reading about check_mk with Livestatus and I think it'll help me.
--
Wallace Gerheim
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
A
Thanks everyone for reply.
I think i wasn't correctly on my explanation ...
My nagios central have a lot of objects (included nagios client objects). I
want to manipulate only a few on nagios client. I'm looking to decentralize
the "scope" of clients.
For example: i have 3 clients. Each one are r
Hi Wallace,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Gerheim wrote:
> I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users mailing list.
> I was looking for addons for Nagios but i didn't find one wich attends me.
> Let me explain my scenario. If someone could help me, i ll be grateful.
> I have one nagios central with c
My vote is to look at Multisite and livestatus from check_mk project.
Dan
From: Gerheim [mailto:wallacegerh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:01 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring
Hello folks,
I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users
On 30/03/11 14:00, Gerheim wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users mailing list.
I was looking for addons for Nagios but i didn't find one wich attends me.
Let me explain my scenario. If someone could help me, i ll be grateful.
I have one nagios central with centreon. I have anot
Gerheim wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm new on Nagios and nagios-users mailing list.
> I was looking for addons for Nagios but i didn't find one wich attends me.
> Let me explain my scenario. If someone could help me, i ll be grateful.
>
> I have one nagios central with centreon. I have another nagio
On 18 May 2010 15:21, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
>
> I am thinking about testing DNX ( dnx.sf.net )
> But since one can't define which check will run on which
> node, we would have to reconfigure a lot of firewalls.
> Would dnx be worth this hassle ? Any experiences ?
I'm interested too about it.
Hi Gael,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Gael Cheron wrote:
> I'm facing the same issue. And I'd like to find a way to turn off the
> monitoring on the remote host from the web interface on the main server.
> Because operators are not abble to log on the remote monitoring servers.
> Does anyon
Hi,
I'm facing the same issue. And I'd like to find a way to turn off the
monitoring on the remote host from the web interface on the main server.
Because operators are not abble to log on the remote monitoring servers.
Does anyone know if there is an add-on abble to do this ? I think about
Centr
>From my knowledge, you'll either need to log in to the
server running the remote nagios instance and disable checks
in the configuration, or turn notifications off at the
instance running the web interface. Depending on your
needs, it might seem a decent fit to simply turn off
notifications yet
Marc Powell ha scritto in data 25/09/2009 14.14:
>
> It sounds like you're looking for Freshness Checks. It's discussed in
> the Distributed Monitoring documentation.
>
Thank's Marc,
Meanwhile I've read better the documentation, the freshness threshold does the
trick.
Thank's!
Simon
-
On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:28 AM, Simone Felici wrote:
> Every time the Distributed monitoring server sends the status of a
> host to the core server, does the core server reset
> the timer when it makes an active check or does it make an active
> check anyway?
It will still perform the active ch
I found the problem. All International SNMP Bandwidth checks from
check_snmp_int.pl which are giving Nagios Satellites latencies of up to
17 seconds and a minimum of 5 seconds. This is making the whole check
queue go rocket high.
I'll just have to go back to MRTG :(
Or does anyone have a good SNM
If you want the satellites to suppress host/service checks when hosts are
unreachable, then yes.
Otherwise, your central Nagios master will correctly suppress notifications (as
it knows about the dependencies, and the satellites don't do notifications)
On our system, Ive defined the dependencies
>
> On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Paul Landauer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 12:06 -0600, Marc Powell wrote:
>
> > I'm using 2 servers following the documentation at
> > http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/distributed.html
>
> Thanks.
>
> >> - example host and service definitions fro
Hi Paul,
Please always respond on list so that others now, and in the future,
can learn from your experience and so that you can benefit from the
experience of others on the list. More below...
On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Paul Landauer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 12:06 -0600, Marc Powel
On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Paul Landauer wrote:
> Using nagios 3.0.5
> Distributed Monitoring setup
> Hosts and Services show updated status information but the status of
> the
> host or service does not change from "up" on the central server.
> Status
> on the distributed servers is refl
-Original Message-
From: Nick Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:01 AM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring without direct
networkconnection
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Er
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 November 2008 14:01
> To: Nick Lunt
> Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring without direct
> network connection
>
> Ni
Nick Lunt wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> nagios 3.0.5 on RHEL 4u6.
>
> We have nagios servers all over the uk and we want to get all alerts
> from each nagios server to a central nagios server at our main offices.
>
> We do not have permanent network connectivity to the remote nagios
> servers so using N
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Nick Lunt wrote:
>
>> It's not that the connections will be up/down it's more that they simply
>> won't be there. Most of our clients are NHS (hospitals) and we have to
>> have a secure vpn connection that we dial in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Lunt wrote:
> It's not that the connections will be up/down it's more that they simply
> won't be there. Most of our clients are NHS (hospitals) and we have to
> have a secure vpn connection that we dial into on an as needed basis.
>
> We curre
If I get this working I'll treat myself to curry :)
Try a coconut milk + pineapple curry. Serve with ginger salad. Little
closer to heaven. ~BAS-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's chall
On 28 Nov 2008, at 16:00, Nick Lunt wrote:
So I'll have nagios clients -> nagios -> send_email -> primary
nagios server -> postfix -> mail filter -> send_nsca -> nagios
If I get this working I'll treat myself to curry :)
You deserve a vindaloo.
So basically, you are using email from the
at myself to curry :)
From: Ton Voon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 November 2008 15:35
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring without direct
networkconnection
Thanks for the plug, but Opsview is not really suitable for this. We
h
Thanks for the plug, but Opsview is not really suitable for this. We
have distributed monitoring out-of-the-box, but it requires the
permanent connection between slaves and the master which Nick says he
hasn't got.
If you will have temporary connections (that go up and down), we have
been
Try looking at opsview , it is doing what you want with nagios as a component
in his setup.
http://www.opsview.org/
On Friday 28 November 2008 11:53:28 Nick Lunt wrote:
> Hi folks
>
>
>
> nagios 3.0.5 on RHEL 4u6.
>
>
>
> We have nagios servers all over the uk and we want to get all alerts
>
mark redding wrote:
Hi all,
I currently have Nagios 2.10 installed on a couple of machines, one of
which is configured as a master and the other as a slave.
I have a script running on the slave which rsync's up the configs from
the master and performs health checks of the master to see that it
-
From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 1:36 PM
To: Jeff Shumard - DefenseWeb Technologies
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring with nrpe_nt and
freshness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/07 01:11 PM, Jeff Shumard - DefenseWeb Technologies wrote:
> We have our monitoring configured and everything is working great
> checking all our windows servers through a single windows server running
> nrpe_nt. The problem we are having is
t: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:19:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring Freshness checkingfailing
then recovering
Sean;
I have a very large deployment so I use this tool:
http://www.nagioscommunity.org/wiki/index.php/OCP_Daemon
This daemon runs on each of the distributed ser
TECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean McAvoy
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 12:09 PM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed monitoring Freshness
> checkingfailing then recovering
>
> On further investigat
Hi Sean,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Sean McAvoy wrote:
> On further investigations it looks as though the problem is with the
> time taken to submit the results back to nagios via send_nsca.
> I have read about a couple different options for getting results back
> quickly. One being a bulk system of tr
On further investigations it looks as though the problem is with the
time taken to submit the results back to nagios via send_nsca.
I have read about a couple different options for getting results back
quickly. One being a bulk system of transfer, a file containing the
results is sent via a s
TEST_FRESHNESS
printf("CHECKFRESHNESS 3\n");
#endif
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Shumard - DefenseWeb Technologies
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 20:58
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subje
hank you,
Jeff
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco
Supino
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:43 PM
To: Simon Marcil; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring Web Interface Issue
Hi,
Hi Marco,
I will set this up.
Thanks a lot!
Simon
From: Marco Supino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May-09-07 1:43 AM
To: Simon Marcil; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring Web Interface Issue
Hi,
I have the same scenario
Hi,
I have the same scenario, and what I did was to enable active checks on
all services, but put check_period to none, so a check is never
executed, except if freshness checking runs it.
Marco.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saulo Silva
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:28 AM
> To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring : Monitoring server
> sendingalert .
>
>
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 13:08 +0300, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
>
> > I have one nagios server working in my company, and
> I
> > need to add another nagios server to monitor another servers in
> other
> > subnets,
> >
> > I don't know if there's any solution to have 2 nagios servers(
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:28:43AM +0200, Moayad Mohammad wrote:
> I have one nagios server working in my company, and I
> need to add another nagios server to monitor another servers in other
> subnets,
>
> I don't know if there's any solution to have 2 nagios servers(1 central
>
Yes you can.
Do a google for distributed monitoring.
Basically it caomes down to having the one nagios configured as a slave.
It then passes all its info to the main Nagios. The services that are
monitored
on the slave nagios, are configured as "passive" on the main Nagios., but
the
data is sti
> > I'm running Nagios is a distributed environment which is working very
> > well. I would like to add a little redundancy to the
> picture now that I have everything working. ;-)
...
> > It seems that a secondary "cold spare" might be the best solution.
> > Then there are maintenance issues wit
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 09:51 -0700, Mike Koponick wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I’m running Nagios is a distributed environment which is working very
> well. I would like to add a little redundancy to the picture now that
> I have everything working. ;-)
>
> Since I’m running a distributed environm
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Koponick
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Distributed Monitoring - Redundancy
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I'm r
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006
5:41 PMTo: Morris, Patrick;
nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Nagios-users]
Distributed Monitoring
Below is snippets
from configuration. Is there a way to debug send_nsca ? I tried snoop and
the port, tcpdump and the port, or tail on the nagios.log f
’30 second till retry on soft fail
Thanks for the assistance.
From: Morris, Patrick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006
20:29
To: InnovationsTech, Matthew
Thomas; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users]
Distributed Monitoring
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:06:08PM -0400, InnovationsTech, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> ran, or adjust how often the distributed server updates the central
> server?
If you are obsessing over services, then send_nsca is called for
each and every service check.
> I have freshness turned on, and it always
Results will be getting sent to your ocsp
command every time a check result comes back on the distributed server if
it's obsessing. Are you sure the checks are running every 90
seconds? Or, have you set a long command_check_interval in
nagios.cfg?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EM
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 12:08 +0100, Rob Hassing wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi Rob,
> I'm trying to setup a distributed monitoring system.
> At the start all looked fine too me, but now I'm having some problems on
> not receiving all passive checks from other hosts.
Distributed monitoring is waaay cool.
Jason Rojas wrote:
Here is a good one for you guys.
I am currently monitoring roughly 4357 services on 700 hosts.
Now this is not all the hosts/services I need to be monitoring.
From the output of nagios -s -c nagios.cfg
it tells me that one complete run checking all mentioned
services/hosts wi
58 matches
Mail list logo
