Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:08:01
> To:
> Reply-To: nailtech@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: {SPAM?} Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it,
> Eliminate all licensing - Indiana
>
> There wouldn't be any laws against mma. If there is no law/rules,
> nothing
s.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:08:01
To:
Reply-To: nailtech@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: {SPAM?} Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it,
Eliminate all licensing - Indiana
There wouldn't be any laws against mma. If there is no law/rules,
nothing can be done. diana from indiana
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it,
Eliminate all licensing - Indiana
how do they propose to do away with cosmo licensing while retaining
mani and esthi licensing? Will that mean you won't need a license
to do hair, but if you
: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:33:09
To: nailtech@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: nailtech@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, Eliminate all
licensing - Indiana
I think I understand where you stand on the licensing issue, Maggie and,
although I agree, I'm not sure
"
>Maggie Rants [and Raves]@Nails Magazine
>Facebook
>
>
>
>
>From: Debbie Doerrlamm
>>To: nailtech@googlegroups.com
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:25 AM
>>Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, Eliminate all
>>licensing - Indi
ionary rebel dreamer; obviously way ahead of my time."
<http://blogs.nailsmag.com/maggie/>Maggie Rants [and Raves]@Nails Magazine
<http://www.facebook.com/onykophile>Facebook
From: Debbie Doerrlamm
To: nailtech@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Nai
m
>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:25 AM
>Subject: Re: NailTech:: Re: House Bill 1006 - they did it, Eliminate all
>licensing - Indiana
>
>
>Wendy, read closer.. it says IF the legislation is NOT passed - the board NOT
>eliminated - the manicurist and esthetician licenses w
OMG!! It was my representative that introduced the bill. He just lost my
vote. Jerkface.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 11, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Wendy Updegrave wrote:
> Oh Diana, How discouraging!
> It seems as though they will keep Manicurists and Estheticians
> licensed, which is good.
> It m
Manicuring and estheticians license won't change if the legislature votes to
keep cosmetology/barbering licenses. Otherwise, all licensing is gone.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 11, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Wendy Updegrave wrote:
> Oh Diana, How discouraging!
> It seems as though they will keep Manicur
Wendy, read closer.. it says IF the legislation is NOT passed - the
board NOT eliminated - the manicurist and esthetician licenses will
not be changed.. they said if the bill passed, the entire board
would be dissolved and let the buyer beware.. if it fails and the
board is retained, there wi
Oh Diana, How discouraging!
It seems as though they will keep Manicurists and Estheticians
licensed, which is good.
It may not pass or pass with modifications
I feel your pain! I am surprised they didn't use CT as a shining
example of how licensing is not needed. ( I, too, am being facetious!)
I'll
11 matches
Mail list logo
