Since Exodus is mostly a webhoster, do they have an asymmetric traffic
flow. Isn't bulk of the bandwidth is outbound from Exodus. Won't this
just increase the distance and AS count for Exodus outbound traffic,
making Exodus hosting even less desirable?
Well spotted. Everybody sees this
E.B. Dreger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Service patches were never applied. When some suspicious
happenings left said server inoperable, they just installed
Win2000 and went on, not caring what had happened or why.
No, I was not the employee. A friend of mine worked there before
getting fed
Hello,
I would like to ask you for an advice in regards to
proxy registering of customer route objects in IRR.
What is the best current practice in a situation,
when your customers want to advertise to you several
/18 or /19 but they also have a requirement to be able
to advertise some
In the referenced message, Przemyslaw Karwasiecki said:
Hello,
I would like to ask you for an advice in regards to
proxy registering of customer route objects in IRR.
What is the best current practice in a situation,
when your customers want to advertise to you several
/18 or /19
On 2002-03-26-12:58:09, Chris Woodfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, Exodus had arrangements with at least some of their peering
partners where in exchange for the toleration of the asymetric
traffic flow at peering points, they would honor MEDs sent to them
by said peering partners.
