Re: Let's talk about Distance Sniffing/Remote Visibility

2002-03-28 Thread E.B. Dreger
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:19:55 -0500 From: Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (snipping throughout) Disk I/O on a sniffer box? Sounds like you've been sniffing something other than packets my friend. :) I like to log interesting packets; I agree with Carl. You can build your own

Re: Let's talk about Distance Sniffing/Remote Visibility

2002-03-28 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 05:59:20PM +, E.B. Dreger wrote: I like to log interesting packets; I agree with Carl. Logging interesting packets is easy enough, its logging ALL packets that would be a problem. At any rate, you'd run out of harddrive space pretty quick if you were pushing max

Re: Let's talk about Distance Sniffing/Remote Visibility

2002-03-28 Thread E.B. Dreger
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:14:17 -0500 From: Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logging interesting packets is easy enough, its logging ALL packets that would be a problem. At any rate, you'd run out of harddrive space pretty quick if you were pushing max performance at any length

Re: BGP without an IGP

2002-03-28 Thread Jake Khuon
### On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:40:51 -0500, Abarbanel, Benjamin ### [EMAIL PROTECTED] casually decided to expound upon ### 'Randy Bush' [EMAIL PROTECTED], Russ White [EMAIL PROTECTED] the ### following thoughts about RE: BGP without an IGP: BA into the AS as IBGP routes. But from what I understood

Change Control

2002-03-28 Thread Heath_Dieckert
delurk Hey all, I am interested in your thoughts on best practices in network engineering/implementation change control for the large business organization. Specifically what have you found that works best and why? Interested in your thoughts on business partner notification, management