On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, batz wrote:
Personally, I would like to see a mixture of the MAPS RBL and
aris.securityfocus.com available, where emerging hostile netblocks
can be blackholed for short periods of time using attack information
gathered from and coroborated by a vast array of diverse
And I wanted to download files, but certainly did not want to unwittingly
support a CDN.
Maybe everyone will simply cease using the software. It certainly
would set a nice example for other corporations implementing spyware, and
other unsavory features.
Regards,
James
On Wed, 3 Apr
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Steve Sobol wrote:
I wouldn't touch Qwest, based on the Enron issue, if nothing else.
I am pretty sure you can make a case that other Tier1s did the same thing.
This isnt unique to Qwest or Enron.
Christian
-
i am me, i dont write/speak for them
In a former life as well as my current one, we had a primary Information
Security officer, and myself acting as corporate firewall engineer. I found
that my own role was best performed as a network security conductor of the
orchestra of sysadmins who actually built and operated our Internet
When did this start?
dig uunet.com @a.gtld-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 uunet.com @a.gtld-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 4
;;
Once upon a time, Matt Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When did this start?
snip
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
UUCP-GW-1.PA.DEC.com. 2D IN A 16.1.0.18
UUCP-GW-1.PA.DEC.com. 2D IN A 204.123.2.18
Apparently, about a year ago at least:
$ whois host
When did this start?
For uucp-gw-1.pa.dec.com, when I asked them to back in 1995 or so (I
forget when I dual-homed uucp-gw-1, but that's the right ballpark).
Stephen
Bear in mind that the financial situation at Qwest is bad.
Isn't that partially due to deals with Enron on which they
misrepresented sales numbers?
Partially, but not primarily. The lead front page article in the
Wednesday WSJ is about how badly mismanaged Qwest is. The gist of it
is that US
On 4 Apr 2002, John R. Levine wrote:
Partially, but not primarily. The lead front page article in the
Wednesday WSJ is about how badly mismanaged Qwest is. The gist of it
is that US West was a sleepy RBOC with mediocre management, then Qwest
which was what one might call a dot.fiber
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:07:59PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snip]
I know it's indefensible in principle, but even though I have books in
Korean translation, I get no real mail from Korea so the collateral
damage is for me is imperceptible. The rejection message includes a
It's not
solutions to the Koran spam problem
^
tongue in cheek
ok.. let's not blame EVERYTHING on muslims
/tongue in cheek
marc
11 matches
Mail list logo
