Oh, no. If anyone has illusions that politicos can somehow fix the
situation, he ought to do serious reality check. If anything, they made
that mess in the first place by creating ILEC monopolies and allowing
those supposedly regulated monopilists to strange the emerging last mile
broadband
On 18 Jun 2002, George Jones wrote:
We (UUNET) have an internal document that we've been using for a few
years as the basis for tests of security features of equipment to be
connected to our backbone. We're interested in making it public so
that it can be improved and so that others can use
I'm certainly no expert on US telecom politics but, on a global scale Telecoms
companies always seems to be monopolies and ISPs arent.. and its not to do with
political policies
Most (all?) countries historically had an incumbent operator which at some time
in the last 20 years was deregulated
when this situation has existed in other industries, gov't intervention
has always resulted. even when the scope is international. i've not
been able to puzzle out the reason why the world's gov'ts have not
stepped in with some basic interconnection requirements for IP carriers.
Some
SJW Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 11:09:53 +0100 (BST)
SJW From: Stephen J. Wilcox
SJW Most (all?) countries historically had an incumbent operator
SJW which at some time in the last 20 years was deregulated..
SJW the trouble is whichever entity gets to own the wires in a
SJW region has a total
Anyone know if the link-up is still going to happen?
I've heard from a few people that given the financial issues at MFN,
this is highly unlikely to still happen. Anyone know any different?
Paul?
--Phil
i just want to clarify that...
Oh, no. If anyone has illusions that politicos can somehow fix the
situation, he ought to do serious reality check. ...
...while my name does appear in the Subject: header, i have no illusions
that the world's gov'ts can do a better job on peering architecture
Anyone know if the link-up is still going to happen?
everyone i've talked to still wants it to happen. does that count?
I've heard from a few people that given the financial issues at MFN,
this is highly unlikely to still happen. Anyone know any different?
it seems to me that it's more
Anyone know if the link-up is still going to happen?
I've heard from a few people that given the financial issues at MFN,
this is highly unlikely to still happen. Anyone know any different?
I would not say that the outlook is as bleak as that.
Stephen
day-job .sig:
Stephen Stuart [EMAIL
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
Sorry for interrupting our quarterly peering debate, but I'd like to
ask if there are any groups for people who are Postmasters (abuse, spam,
dmca, etc)? I know there are many groups for people who want to complain
about those subjects, but I was
Gordon what did I tell you about posting to NANOG? Shouldn't you be busy uncovering
ICANN conspiracies and interviewing Bill St. Arnaud for the 50th time? Can we look
forward to a summary of this thread in your next report?
Gordon Cook wrote:
Where is it possible to gain any reliable data
IN TXT tldtag field='email' value='[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in this case, the suggesion that TXT RR's be put alongside NS RR's *above*
the zone cut is your clue that the whole thing is a put-on. i guess this
author was being too subtle about it, so you didn't catch the humour.
Sean Donelan wrote:
Sorry for interrupting our quarterly peering debate, but I'd like to
ask if there are any groups for people who are Postmasters (abuse, spam,
dmca, etc)
Alcoholics Anonymous.
Frank Rizzo
ATTENTION ALL INCLUSIVE NAMESPACE ROOT SERVER ZONE MANAGERS! HEAR YE,
HEAR YE!
This is either a scam or a really bad joke. I can't tell which, but I
pity the people who were mislead into reading this mail and acting
accordingly. I repeat, there was no Internet-impacting maintenance
going
John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
Sorry Paul, I guess you don't understand how those TLDTAG records
work.
Sorry John, I guess you don't understand how Internet naming works.
There is one true root file, and it's not yours. Might I suggest
re-reading some ORA publications before you go off
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Rizzo Frank said:
ATTENTION ALL INCLUSIVE NAMESPACE ROOT SERVER ZONE MANAGERS! HEAR YE,
HEAR YE!
This is either a scam or a really bad joke. I can't tell which, but I
pity the people who were mislead into reading this mail and acting
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Rizzo Frank wrote:
John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
Sorry Paul, I guess you don't understand how those TLDTAG records
work.
Sorry John, I guess you don't understand how Internet naming works.
There is one true root file, and it's not yours.
I guess the moon
I guess the moon is in phase with some star somewhere, and now it's time to
argue who's root is he real root... Barf. Enough already - we all have
our own roots. one guy follows Vixies roots, while I typically roll my
own. Many others do other things.
The final point of this insanity is
18 matches
Mail list logo
