I have gotten a massive response.. I am going to organize it all and
give everyone a nice list... Just give me a few to organize it :)
Paul just hit on it. At how many layers do you want protection, and
will they interfere with each other. Granted not all protection
schemes overlap. If there if not a layer 1 failure, and a router
maintains link0 but the card or routers has somehow failed and is no
longer passing packets,
So read about Palladianism, and tell me the
different between Palladium and Server 2000
Windows Palladium, the end of privacy as
we know it.
This taken from various sources
encluding UHA and deviantart, the register and slashdot., Disturbing
news..
Earlier this week, Microsoft outlin
While I find much to worry about in Palladium, the vast majority of
the information in this post is simply not correct. Even Microsoft is
not delusional enough to think that they could get away with such a
coup. (Not that they would not want to.)
Before going ballistic, read up on Palladium and
for research purposes. we want to send a periodic announce and a
withdraw of a specific prefix. but we don't want to hit folk's
damping policies. does anyone damp a swamp /24 which does an
announce / withdraw on a two hour cycle? i.e. announce at
0,2,4,... and withdraw at 1,3,5,..?
randy
> I suppose the discussion is what do you want from your exchange pt
> operator and what do you NOT want.
At the IXP level, "bits per month" always trumps "bits per second",
and usually trumps "pennies per bit" as well. There are now a number
of companies trying to sell wide area ethernet -- e
Guess my home P.C. will no longer be an intel
platform..hello mighty SPARC
Gerardo Gregory
- Original Message -
From:
blitz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 5:50
PM
Subject: Microslosh vision of the
future
So
read abou
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, gg wrote:
>
> Guess my home P.C. will no longer be an intel platform..hello mighty SPARC
I guess you didn't actually read this, did you? It makes no difference what
you use at home, if that machine can't talk to the rest of the world.
>
> Gerardo Gregory
>
>
>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:22:00PM -0700, Lane Patterson wrote:
> BGP keepalive/hold timers are configurable even down to granularity of
> link or PVC level keepalives, but for session stability reasons, it
> appears that most ISPs at GigE exchanges choose not to tweak them down
> from the defau
Microsoft can have whatever vision of the future they want and can use any
resources at their disposal to bring their vision to light. Everybody has
that right. If I don't like it, I won't buy it. If they convince customers
that they gain more than they lose, only a gun will make them bu
Microsoft already duped the software consumers into buying into fully
proprietary software. Given the prevalent time horizon of average IT
manager's thinking I fully expect Microsoft to get that stuff deployed
before the poor saps start realizing they're being ripped. After that
Microsoft wil
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 18:43:17 -0700 (PDT), Vadim Antonov wrote:
>Microsoft already duped the software consumers into buying into fully
>proprietary software.
I don't think duped is really a fair description. They simply provide a
large number of users with what they want. There isn't cu
We have given up on M$ when they started invading our hard drives with
XP...no reason to think their plans are anything less than nefarious,
judging from their past behavior.
At 16:10 8/11/02 -0700, you wrote:
>While I find much to worry about in Palladium, the vast majority of
>the informat
Well, I may be a wet blanket to the chip houses, but how much speed DO
you actually need? Any REAL reason to abandon the present working
architecture? I don't personally think so, a 2 gig box is plenty fast for
anything we have now, so why don't we just vote with our feet? DON'T buy
this crap, the
I agree wholeheartedly, "let 'em starve"
At 18:17 8/11/02 -0700, you wrote:
> Microsoft can have whatever vision of the future they want and
> can use any
>resources at their disposal to bring their vision to light. Everybody has
>that right. If I don't like it, I won't buy it. If
I just hope the anti-trust people are looking into thisi can't see a
bigger case for them to spring into action...
At 18:43 8/11/02 -0700, you wrote:
>Microsoft already duped the software consumers into buying into fully
>proprietary software. Given the prevalent time horizon of average
Jesper Skriver wrote:
> Your Cisco router (say a GSR) will go foobar if you use 10/30 seconds
> timers, a IGP topology change, causing a new next-hop interface for
> 100k routes, will cause processes (probably CEF related) to run for so
> long, that you will loose your BGP keepalives, thus loose
17 matches
Mail list logo
