Please disregard the previous message (and this one also). A joke which
would have been much funnier had the person known that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was not my email address (and therefore sent the email to the correct
address) :)
Nathan
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Nathan wrote:
Hey,
In my
Can anyone confirm or explain the Qwest outage in Dallas/Fort Worth? Fiber cut maybe?Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:23:56AM -0500, James Ferris wrote:
Interesting. No text/plain content. Please disable HTML in your mailer
and we may be able to read what you are saying :)
Greetz, Peter
--
MegaBIT - open air networking event - http://www.megabit.nl/
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:38:26PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
Looks like the echo mail reflectors at PSI are now gone.
Must've happened today as I use these frequently.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:29:41 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] still works
-j
Martin
yeah - massive 'outage' yesterday (over 6 hours) as they changed all
sorts of stuff from PSI to cogent. No notice, just a 'fiber cut', cough :-(
Typical Cogent.
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
+44 (0)1865 842300
Martin Hannigan wrote:
Looks
Hi, Martin.
What is an echo mail reflector? Is this something I could provide?
It basically allow you to bounce mail off of the address and
returns a copy of your mail replete with headers. Useful for
testing mail configuration, latency, etc.
Someone just pinged me and said that [EMAIL
That's why you make sure that any incidents where max-prefix is tripped is
caught by a syslog watcher and brought to the immediate attention of whoever's
sitting in your NOC. Honestly, if all you're dealing with is customer BGP
session, I would propose that 90% of them don't advertise more
I cant get a hold of anyone in the NOC, but my local field tech says
several large circuits got knocked out as a result of a broken pipe in
their CO on University Ave. Does anyone else have any more details ? All
the 1 800#s I have for them are still fast busy.
---Mike
At 12:53 PM -0400 2002/08/16, Martin Hannigan wrote:
It basically allow you to bounce mail off of the address and
returns a copy of your mail replete with headers. Useful for
testing mail configuration, latency, etc.
We built systems like this for AOL (to monitor the latency of
OK. This is a bit beyond the charter, but there was a long and
annoying thread on Microsoft Palladium last week and I just read an
interesting article that seems to minimize the FUD I have been seeing.
http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0208.html
The author is Bruce Schneier, one of the
Bruce Schneier seems to confirm the worst expected about Pd.
At 11:13 8/16/02 -0700, you wrote:
OK. This is a bit beyond the charter, but there was a long and
annoying thread on Microsoft Palladium last week and I just read an
interesting article that seems to minimize the FUD I have been
Hi all,
[This may sound like a perennial question.]
I'm curious as to how you configure your routers (whatever they may be).
In particular, what tools do you use? Home grown? Rancid? Vendor
provided?
I'll summarize.
Thanks in advance,
Eliot
I'm curious as to how you configure your routers (whatever they may be).
In particular, what tools do you use? Home grown? Rancid? Vendor
provided?
telnet and ssh
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote:
:I cant get a hold of anyone in the NOC, but my local field tech says
:several large circuits got knocked out as a result of a broken pipe in
:their CO on University Ave. Does anyone else have any more details ? All
:the 1 800#s I have for them are
I'm not sure why this is such a worry since a lot of these
responders have been working for over a decade, and they've
all been just fine operating the way they are.
-M
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 9:43 PM +0200 2002/08/16, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
Brad Knowles([EMAIL
At 4:33 PM -0400 2002/08/16, Martin Hannigan wrote:
I'm not sure why this is such a worry since a lot of these
responders have been working for over a decade, and they've
all been just fine operating the way they are.
Most security holes are not anything to worry about -- until
At 9:43 PM +0200 2002/08/16, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
- scoreboard: one mail from one source addres in one minute time window
Do you just queue messages from source addresses, so that you
don't generate more than one echo in a minute, or do you throw away
every message from that
Brad Knowles([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.08.16 22:27:08 +:
At 9:43 PM +0200 2002/08/16, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
Brad Knowles([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.08.16 19:48:10 +:
What kinds of anti-abuse protection methods have people used for
echo accounts that they have set up?
-
Brad Knowles([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.08.16 23:46:51 +:
At 9:43 PM +0200 2002/08/16, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
- scoreboard: one mail from one source addres in one minute time window
Do you just queue messages from source addresses, so that you
don't generate more than one
A number of major music labels have joined forces and are seeking relief
from backbone providers, see:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyncid=582e=2cid=582u=/nm/200
20816/wr_nm/media_copyright_dc_4
It sounds like the labels are alleging that the providers are, in some
way, contributing
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:03:37PM -0400, John Ferriby wrote:
A number of major music labels have joined forces and are seeking relief
from backbone providers, see:
Ok here's a question, why are they sueing ATT, CW, and UU? I see
Listen4ever behind 4134 (China Telecom), who I only see buying
Might just be better to stand aside, and let them be Ddos'ed off the
air...for thats whats coming to them...
Might I suggest filtering the websites of the offending major labels as
an appropriate retort?
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Ok here's a question, why are they sueing ATT, CW, and UU? I see
Listen4ever behind 4134 (China Telecom), who I only see buying transit
through InterNAP. Wouldn't it be simpler for them to sue InterNAP? I guess
it would sure be nice
This is an auto-generated mail on Fri Aug 16 23:00:01 PDT 2002
It is not checked before it leaves my workstation. However, hopefully
you will find this report interesting and will take the time to look
through this to see if you can improve the amount of aggregation you
perform.
Check
24 matches
Mail list logo
