I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP
in the AP region that would enable me to
|I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
|a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
|ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
|trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP
|in the AP region that would
|I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
|a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
|ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
|trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP
|in the AP region that would
Here's what I see:
BGP routing table entry for 199.212.134.0/24, version 5658446
Paths: (3 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Advertised to peer-groups:
tn-core
18984 3561 852 11647
216.182.0.33 (metric 2965760) from 216.182.0.33 (216.182.0.33)
Origin
At 01:31 PM 26/09/2002 -0400, Vinny Abello wrote:
Looks like something isn't right... I see the announcement from Sprint
with an AS path of 1239 852 11647, but it never gets past one of the
routers on Sprint's network. I have no problem going through Cable and
Wireless:
Yes, and the strange
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:36:02AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
sadly the best spot to interconnect is not in the AP region, its in Palo
Alto.
Is this really still true?
I would not be surprised to find that it is.
Asia Pacific is an enormous region with lots of inconvenient ocean
all
Hi,
This morning we've discovered that one of our IP's was routed somewhere
towards an ALTER.NET customer.
All the experiments i'm going to show you are done from
route-server.exodus.net.
a show ip bgp 193.231.236.41 show that the originator of the IP Block from
where 193.231.236.41 belongs
Have you contacted 701?
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Sorin CONSTANTINESCU wrote:
Hi,
This morning we've discovered that one of our IP's was routed somewhere
towards an ALTER.NET customer.
All the experiments i'm going to show you are done from
route-server.exodus.net.
a show ip bgp
Yes, we did. The e-mail was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] We
also called at 1-800-900-0241 option 2 3 1. All we got was some ticket
numbers.
Bye,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, dies wrote:
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:06:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: dies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sorin
Yep, you're right. Looks like they might blackholing the /32 with a null
route on their network somewhere.
At 01:35 PM 9/26/2002 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 01:31 PM 26/09/2002 -0400, Vinny Abello wrote:
Looks like something isn't right... I see the announcement from Sprint
with an AS path
From: Neil J. McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP
.ro -- try their London or Amsterdam guys. In an earlier life --
Teleglobe -- I
found them quite responsive (at least EU daytime :).
Cheers
mh
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Sorin Constantinescu
Envoye : jeudi 26 septembre 2002 20:21
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
:How does the government know when the Internet is down? They pay
:contractors lots of money to put colored maps on the wall.
Back to a previous thread about this, down is relative to
the importance of the resource. If something was affecting
the
At 02:27 PM 26/09/2002 -0400, Vinny Abello wrote:
Yep, you're right. Looks like they might blackholing the /32 with a null
route on their network somewhere.
To mitigate the impact, I am sending 199.212.134.0/24 as a more specific
route through my other transit provider (15290) who does not
IP Community:
When designing an all IP network requiring mostly Ethernet interfaces, the logical
conclusion is to specify layer 3 switches (instead of routers). The cost per port and
functionality requirements make a layer 3 switch the perfect choice. However, the rule
of thumb in the IP
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:43:19PM -0400, Dorian Kim scribbled:
| On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:30:42PM -0500, keichii wrote:
| Above.net and ATT are your best bets for operations based in the Americas.
| Above has a .jp IX/colo that is almost the best connected place in AP.
| ATT and Above.net
Hi,
If it's of any interest, the slides from my SwiNOG-5 presentation
on DDoS (attacks, detection, protection, etc) are available:
http://www.securite.org/presentations/ddos/
Some older slides from BH US'02 on IP Backbone Security are
also available (PPT'97 and PDF):
If the owner of the ip address would like to contact the UUNET NOC in EU
and ask for: Mr. Beechey he can connect you with the person attempting to
contact you about this.
--Chris
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
###
## UUNET Technologies, Inc.
As it turns out, the NCS has an RFI out on the street looking for input of
just this sort. See it at
https://www.ditco.disa.mil/dcop/Public/ASP/requirement.asp?req_no=NCS_RFI.
We would love to hear from you all!
JW
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:45:53AM -0400, German Martinez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
|a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
|ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
|trying
At 01:37 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Lane Patterson wrote:
I would confirm GM's assertion. Also, if you have the luxury of caring
more about a smaller set of large-capacity Tier1 private peers, there is
some presence of AsiaPac providers doing this at Equinix SJ.
Actually Equinix-Los Angeles has more
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 04:52:33PM -0400, ren wrote:
At 01:37 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Lane Patterson wrote:
I would confirm GM's assertion. Also, if you have the luxury of caring
more about a smaller set of large-capacity Tier1 private peers, there is
some presence of AsiaPac providers doing
I read the thread on NANOG about MPLS in Metro Networks and the replies
danced around this issue but didn't address it directly. I'd like to know
if anyone is/is considering using MPLS as a Layer 1 or Layer 2 protection
mechanism, whether alone or in combination with other protection
Hello friends,
I have this very odd email address found with one of our employees
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A.f.a.i.k. 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 is:
NetRange: 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
CIDR: 172.16.0.0/12
NetName:IANA-BBLK-RESERVED
NetHandle: NET-172-16-0-0-1
Parent:
On Friday, 2002-09-27 at 03:14 GMT, E.B. Dreger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's difficult for TCP to work when there's no return path,
unless one has highly-predictable ISNs. Chances are it's
inside the network.
Perhaps you missed the point where the original problem was with an email
TR Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 20:31:00 -0700
TR From: Tony Rall
TR Perhaps you missed the point where the original problem was
TR with an email address:
Indeed I did. Note to self: Parse properly before posting to
NANOG.
[Hopefully] on-topic response to OP after rereading: No, there
is no
Depending on the content of the headers, this address
can be injected into the flow of the email. This is very
easy to do. The important thing to look at regarding the
headers from such an email are the last few transactions
I would suspect that the first few lines read IPs that are
familiar
A handful of incumbent telcos of AP region countries as well as few others
operate multigigabit IP networks across the Pacific. I don't think they'd
agree with your statement.
Dorian is absolutely right here. There are even some incumbent telcos (not only from
AP) with capacity between
28 matches
Mail list logo
