As to whether ISP's should install firewalls at every external
Internet connection, I think the question would be more appropriately
phrased as: Should ISP's have policy enforcement mechanisms at every
gateway?
The answer to this is "Yes". Much of the problem that exists right
now can be attri
Anyone have insight into the (seemingly) DoS attack on root-servers which
started around 20 UTC and widened to more servers on 20:35 UTC?
Not that it´s causing any serious operational problems but slows down things a
lot.
Pete
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Anyone have insight into the (seemingly) DoS attack on root-servers which
> started around 20 UTC and widened to more servers on 20:35 UTC?
>
> Not that it´s causing any serious operational problems but slows down things a
> lot.
You can see pretty gra
That's root-servers.org, Sean.
Peter
>You can see pretty graphs of the server performance at
>
>http://www.root-servers.net/
>http://www.cymru.com/DNS/dns.html
I´ve prettier graphs. I sent the mail after the performance started lacking
asking if anyone has an idea what´s going on and where the traffic is
originating.
Pete
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Petri Helenius wrote:
> I´ve prettier graphs. I sent the mail after the performance started lacking
> asking if anyone has an idea what´s going on and where the traffic is
> originating.
Best guess, its a smurf attack. Networks which still have ip
directed-broadcast (or your
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:22:50 -0400, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote,
> 3. Consider putting data centers not in the ground floor on the basement,
> but not too high either. Sean, I believe, knows the specific NFPA rule,
> but IIRC you can't have a UPS with acid electrolyte above the third fl
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Crist J. Clark said:
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:22:50 -0400, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote,
> > 3. Consider putting data centers not in the ground floor on the basement,
> > but not too high either. Sean, I believe, knows the specific NFPA rule
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Anyone have insight into the (seemingly) DoS attack on root-servers
> which started around 20 UTC and widened to more servers on 20:35 UTC?
>
> Not that it´s causing any serious operational problems but slows down
> things a lot.
We have automated mon
I don't think so. We saw problems about 15 min before the nsp-sec
list posting, and at that point the volume was turned up..
I don't beleive ICANN received any "advance" warning
but don't quote me on that. I'll go find out though
in private,
john brown
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 05:38:32P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Donelan) writes:
> Best guess, its a smurf attack. Networks which still have ip
> directed-broadcast (or your vendor's equivalent) enabled on interfaces.
>
> Its still amazing how much traffic it can generate.
however, this attack was icmp request, not icmp reply.
--
Pa
Operators who are involved in IETF should consider providing input
(good/bad/other) to the IETF Nomcom -- since that is the best way to
affect
the future makeup of the IESG and IAB. Details below.
Cheers,
Ran
Begin forwarded message:
From: Phil Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Oct 21
Has anyone seen what may be ATM level congestion at the Chicago NAP
recently? ...or have you seen it in the recent past?
We're having trouble pinpointing a problem, which may have been
occurring for a long time, but just now really beginning to affect us
significantly. We are seeing latency on
Ok, I'm a bit late to the party but...
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Saku Ytti wrote:
> 1) Signaling unwanted traffic.
>You would set community which would just inform that you are receiving
> unwanted traffic. This way responsible AS# with statistical netflow
> could easily automaticly search for th
14 matches
Mail list logo
