The Cidr Report

2002-11-22 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Nov 22 21:45:21 2002 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report. Recent Table

Re: Looking for a piece of gear to do...

2002-11-22 Thread Andy Walden
Riverstone 1000 could do this at a reasonable cost. andy -- PGP Key Available at http://www.tigerteam.net/andy/pgp On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Alex Rubenstein wrote: Hi. I am looking for a very simple piece of gear that will do the following: Fast-E |thing|---ATM

Re: Network integrity and non-random removal of nodes

2002-11-22 Thread Stephen Sprunk
Thus spake William Waites [EMAIL PROTECTED] I stand corrected. It would be interesting to see what outdegree looks like as a function of rank -- in the paper they give only the maximum and average (geo. mean) outdegrees. Is there also a critical point 25% of the way through the

Re: Weird distributed spam attack

2002-11-22 Thread sjj
2) uses an attack algorithm to distribute the load so you only see any given source IP every other day Yep. My list of attacking IP's was several thousand deep before I gave up. Back when I used to analyze dialup spammers (well over a year ago) I felt that a large part of the spam problem

Re: Weird distributed spam attack

2002-11-22 Thread Chip Rosenthal
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 09:40:50AM -0800, Joe St Sauver wrote: In addition to thousands of open relays, which are bad enough in their own right, there are also thousands of open proxy servers which a growing number of spammers have been using to launch spam runs lately. I suspect that's what

RE: Cisco hardware advice needed

2002-11-22 Thread haesu
Hello all, A lot of you have replied back to my original email with very good advice. I greatly appreciate everyone's assistance. Thank you --haesu This mail sent through TowardEX Webmail http://mail.towardex.com

Re: Network integrity and non-random removal of nodes

2002-11-22 Thread William Waites
Stephen == Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen However, all of this is still a relatively minor risk Stephen compared to the damage that can be caused by simple human Stephen error. Absolutely. So why the panic? -w

Re: Network integrity and non-random removal of nodes

2002-11-22 Thread Sean Donelan
On 22 Nov 2002, William Waites wrote: Stephen == Stephen Sprunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen However, all of this is still a relatively minor risk Stephen compared to the damage that can be caused by simple human Stephen error. Absolutely. So why the panic? Mean

Luminous Product ?'s (was: Re: Looking for a piece of gear to do)

2002-11-22 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , Someone has been trying to foist off on a friend of mine a box from Scientific-Atlanta called a Luminous ? That is supposed to do the something simular . Anyone have any insights on this product line ? There is also some card/add-on device that

Re: Cyberattack FUD

2002-11-22 Thread Vadim Antonov
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, David Schwartz wrote: Suppose, for example, we'd had closed cockpit doors. The 9/11 terrorists would have threatened the lives of the passengers and crew to induce the pilots to open the doors. The pilots would have opened the doors because the reasoning until

Re: Cyberattack FUD

2002-11-22 Thread David Schwartz
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:31:30 -0800 (PST), Vadim Antonov wrote: In the regular skyjacking the attackers want to get ransom, or divert an airplane to someplace. They'll get cooperation from pilots, too - without any need to be present in the cockpit. So if it is known that the policy is not to