In the middle of all of this talk re: Cogent and such,
they apparantly spent some $$$ somewhere and made our
test connection a whole lot better.
In a nutshell, we did this a month ago and it stank.
Bursty, high and variable latencies.. etc..
Apparently they fixed something.
Yesterday in
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, __ _ wrote:
Ehh...something isn't quite right... I managed '573 kBytes/sec' on a
1.5/384 consumer ADSL... 573 kBytes/sec is 1.5mbit by a good margin :)
Though it is a nice ego boost LOL :) Running the test again as I'm typing
this message so we'll see
SARCASM If anyone is looking for T1/T3 services in Manhattan let me
know. /SARCASM
In an effort to keep what seems like merely a sales pitch from the
previous post on topic...
The best thing we ever did at the last company I worked at to improve
network/newsgroup performance was switch to
I don't really think that a free peering session seems like a 'sales job'
and I don't agree that the original use/protocol of the internet would be
off topic.
As for Satellite feeds... Show me a feed provider who's satellite pushes
more than 45mb/s which is now only 60% of a full feed.
I don't really think that a free peering session...
free was omitted from the first post. I apologize for the confusion and
reaction.
Gerald
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone was aware of a way to use the congestion
of a network link to control the routing update. For example if I have a
very small link that gets congested, I may want the router to withhold a
routing update until link congestion falls below a certain
--On Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:10 -0500 David Scott Olverson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone was aware of a way to use the congestion
of a network link to control the routing update. For example if I have a
very small link that gets congested, I may want
Hearing a lot of complaints this morning from ATT Cable subscribers.. anyone
have an info??
-flint
IIRC, and I may be wrong, either IS-IS or CLNS (can't remember which)
can look at congestion, and EIGRP can look at load if you tweak the K
parameters.
-Ejay
-Original Message-
From: David Scott Olverson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL
Opposite problem -- he wants to delay routing updates if the link is full.
EIGRP by default won't use more than 25/50% (I forget) of link bw, for
instance, but I'm not aware of any intentional features in other IGPs to do
this.
If routing updates constitute enough traffic to disrupt your links,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, __ wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Mike (meuon) Harrison wrote:
In the middle of all of this talk re: Cogent and such,
they apparantly spent some $$$ somewhere and made our
test connection a whole lot better.
This is better?
3
I was poking around to see what was happening with Cogent and AOL
and ran into some interesting info.
The test that Cogent failed was a 2:1 ratio; Cogent was at 3:1 and
AOL insisted they be at no more than 2:1 for free peering.
AOL wants Cogent to pay for peering - the pricing I've heard is
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, David Scott Olverson wrote:
Hello all,
I was wondering if anyone was aware of a way to use the congestion
of a network link to control the routing update. For example if I have a
very small link that gets congested, I may want the router to withhold a
routing
- Original Message -
From: FX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:06 AM
Subject: Cisco IOS EIGRP Network DoS
Hi there,
please find attached an advisory about an issue with the Cisco IOS
Enhanced
IGRP implementation
IIRC, and I may be wrong, either IS-IS or CLNS (can't remember which)
can look at congestion, and EIGRP can look at load if you tweak the K
parameters.
Silly redistribution of IGP into BGP leads to flapping.
Flapping leads to dampening.
Dampening leads to suffering.
Alex
Be mindful of your routes Master Luke!
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, and I may be wrong, either IS-IS or CLNS (can't remember which)
can look at congestion, and EIGRP can look at load if you tweak the K
And including the SSH bug that also has been published
today(http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ssh-packet-suite-vuln.shtml.), it
seems that a lot of networks will have a very happy xmas.
- Original Message -
From: James-lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
17 matches
Mail list logo
