Re: COM/NET informational message

2003-01-04 Thread bdragon
> This message explains an upcoming change in certain behavior of the > com and net authoritative name servers related to internationalized > domain names (IDNs). > > VeriSign Global Registry Services (VGRS) has been a longtime advocate > of IDNs. Our IDN Test Bed has been active for over two ye

Re: Juniper M5/M10 Midplane problems ??

2003-01-04 Thread Dave Aaldering
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:36:53PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John, > Been looking at a M5/M10 box and have noticed its > not real easy (unless I'm blind) to replace the > mid-plane. > > Thus I'm wondering what people in the field have > experienced with respect to mid-plane failures.

FYI

2003-01-04 Thread blitz
This was in my mailbox, might be old news to you, but a FYI Coastal area silenced by cable break 01/04/03 Portland Oregonian JEFFREY KOSSEFF A fiber-optic line break cut off the southern Oregon coast from the rest of the world for much of Friday. After a state cleanup crew accid

Juniper M5/M10 Midplane problems ??

2003-01-04 Thread john
Been looking at a M5/M10 box and have noticed its not real easy (unless I'm blind) to replace the mid-plane. Thus I'm wondering what people in the field have experienced with respect to mid-plane failures. 1. Bent or broken pins on the PIC side 2. Circuit failures My eval of this product is

Re: PowerDNS open source since 25th of November

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Ehlke) writes: > > Many do not know this yet, probably in part due to the helpful > > moderators of comp.protocols.dns.bind, the DNS operators newsgroup on > > usenet, who drop messages about PowerDNS. > > c.p.d.b is not the DNS operator newsgroup, it's the BIND users > n

Re: COM/NET informational message

2003-01-04 Thread Leo Bicknell
In a message written on Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 12:49:06PM -0500, Verd, Brad wrote: > response. The web servers refuse connections on all other UDP and TCP > ports, so other network services are minimally affected. In a message written on Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 11:04:08AM +0100, Måns Nilsson wrote: > T

Re: PowerDNS open source since 25th of November

2003-01-04 Thread Pete Ehlke
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 01:40:42PM +0100, bert hubert wrote: > > Many do not know this yet, probably in part due to the helpful moderators of > comp.protocols.dns.bind, the DNS operators newsgroup on usenet, who drop > messages about PowerDNS. > c.p.d.b is not the DNS operator newsgroup, it's th

PowerDNS open source since 25th of November

2003-01-04 Thread bert hubert
I humbly & grovelingly like to point out here that PowerDNS, the database (and ldap, perl, 'pipe' and bind zonefile) driven nameserver is open source. I think it may be useful for many operators here, especially as PDNS is well suited for 'BGP DNS' trickery. It is GPL licensed and is BIND compatib

Re: COM/NET informational message

2003-01-04 Thread Måns Nilsson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Friday, January 03, 2003 18:31:18 + "E.B. Dreger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > UTF-8 is a standard. MS products have used two-octet chars to > support Unicode for a long time. Any reason to add yet another > encoding? (Sorry, moderato