>
> The first MPEG-4 HD set top boxes are beginning to appear
>
> http://www.sigmadesigns.com/news/press_releases/030108.htm
>
> Watch this space
>
If you read the document carefully, you´ll figure that they support MPEG2 HDTV
(1920x1080)
and MPEG4 SDTV (640x480/720x576), which was my point ea
Anyone else now had two copies of all the messages in this particular thread? They
came through ok the first time, now they're coming through again slowly in reverse
order
--- Original Message ---
From: "Len Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:35
It looks like pkcex003.sprintspectrum.com reinjected them. (use the headers)
They're using Micro$oft products of course.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:20:44PM +, cw wrote:
>
> Anyone else now had two copies of all the messages in this particular thread? They
>came through ok the first time,
i am getting duplicates too -i thought it was just my mail service or
lack of coffee :-)
cw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone else now had two copies of all the messages in this particular
thread? They came through ok the first time, now they're coming through again
slowly in reverse order..
The link wants you to log in with a New York Times login...
-Mike
If you follow the web site instructions you will be logged in with
your own password in 2 or 3 minutes and if your browser save your
pasaword an login id with a cookie you will never have to log in
again on that machine at le
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Baldwin, James wrote:
>
> Something I'm surprised no one has commented on considering the
> direction of this thread has been should ISPs be responsible for
> customer actions if they are not allowed to refuse service to customers?
ISP's can't refuse service to customers?
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > Something I'm surprised no one has commented on considering the
> > direction of this thread has been should ISPs be responsible for
> > customer actions if they are not allowed to refuse service to customers?
>
> ISP's can't refuse service t
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:18:52PM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
>
> Anyone hear of aol not allowing in 69.0.0.0/8 addresses. It was just
> claimed to me but I thought that seemed highly unlikely.
no.
-ron
Hello;
I don't know if anyone has noticed this, but News.Google appends a
&partner=Google variable into New York Times URL's so that news.google
readers can get NYT stories
without registration. Another reason to use News.Google. This should work
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/23/technology/c
I was wondering if anyone out there knows of providers that have a PoP at
601 West 26th Street, NYC and can provide OC3 and above? If so, please
reply off list, thanks.
Guy H. Lupi
> Doesn't ECN depend on 'well behaved' traffic? In other words, wouldn't it
> require the hosts sending traffic to slow down? So... even if the hosts
> slowed down, 10,000 hosts still is a high traffic rate at the end point.
> :(
Yes, for ECN to work the sending host must honor the slowdown reque
> > > Sure, but this like all other attacks of this sort can be tracked... and
> > > so the pain is over /quickly/ provided you can track it quickly :) Also,
> > > sometimes null routes are ok.
> >
> > How quickly is quickly? Often times as has been my recent experience
> > (part of my motivation
hello. i've created a new way to search the ipv4 and ipv6
routing tables of the internet.
i'm not soliciting bgp feeds for my data set (i may at some later
time but i need to think about more long-term disk space and database
performance issues before i do that).
hope p
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:36:14PM -0800, Mike Lyon mooed:
>
> The link wants you to log in with a New York Times login...
> -Mike
You can always learn from other mailing lists.
username: cipherpunks3
password: cipherpunks
-Dave
Draft Agenda: NANOG 27
February 9-11
Phoenix, Arizona
Sunday Tutorials
1:30 - 3:00 p.m.BGP Techniques for Service Provider
Along the same lines of circumventing NYT required login:
http://www.majcher.com/nytview.html
G
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> I don't know if anyone has noticed this, but News.Google appends a
> &partner=Google variable into New York Times URL's so that news.goog
Shameless plug time.
You may also enjoy:
http://bgp.lcs.mit.edu/
Which has 6 views, currently, thanks to many nanog types. We currently
have plans to add ~4 more feeds within the next month, and we are
definitely interested in getting more BGP feeds. (hint hint) :)
Typically, we like to place
I should also mention that we are very open to feature requests from the
NANOG community. We are very interested in making our data and
interface more useful for folks.
-Nick
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:39:48AM -0500, Nick Feamster wrote:
>
> Shameless plug time.
>
> You may also enjoy:
>
> h
Jared Mauch wrote:
> hello. i've created a new way to search the ipv4 and ipv6
> routing tables of the internet.
>
> i'm not soliciting bgp feeds for my data set (i may at
> some later
> time but i need to think about more long-term disk space and database
> performance issues befo
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, todd glassey wrote:
> Vadim - the instant someone sues a Provider for sexual harassment from their
> spam epidemic you will start to see things change. The reason that No-Sane
> provider will block these ports or services is because they have been
> listening to their Network
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, todd glassey wrote:
> Vadim - the instant someone sues a Provider for sexual harassment from
their
> spam epidemic you will start to see things change. The reason that No-Sane
> provider will block these ports or services is because they have been
> listening to their Network
"alex" == alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > Sure, but this like all other attacks of this sort can be
>> > > tracked... and so the pain is over /quickly/ provided you can
>> > > track it quickly :) Also, sometimes null routes are ok.
>> >
>> > How quickly is quickly? Often times as has be
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-981830.html
==
Eric GermannCCTec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Van Wert OH 45801
http://www.cctec.com
The NANOG mailing list is now archived and searchable on the Security
Clipper website at:
http://www.securityclipper.com
Dozens of other security-related mailing lists are available on Security
Clipper, as well, and all are freely searchable.
Is anyone seeing problems delivering email to att.net? I see about 50%
rejected, 50% accepted. The 50% accepted never make it to the endusers.
Been like this for the last 36 hours. Anyone else?
-Jim P.
I have a client that is looking to move from one colo facilty to another
more provider-neutral facility. They are wanting to be able to purchase
transit directly from several carriers without being steered one way or
the other. So, if they want 100mbits from carrier 'A' and carrier 'B',
they sim
Chris at UUNet help determine this is a rDNS issue. att.net seems to have
started rejecting email from mail servers that don't have a proper reverse
DNS entry. This is a good thing, even though it is causing me some problems
at the moment. Thanks Chris.
-Jim P.
> -Original Message-
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
