From: Sean Donelan
Who has the biggest wall of big screen monitors?
To my knowledge, Norad still does.
quoted from article
The Global Early Warning Information System, (GEWIS, pronounced
gee-whiz)
[...]
Mark Rasch, former head of the Justice Department's Computer Crime division,
questioned
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 04:21:40 CST, Jack Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
in this. My question is why large providers couldn't interlink themselves
and establish guidelines for notification and resolution of network issues.
They manage it for peering, why not for overall performance and security
I very much agree with Vladis here.
I'm probably stating the obvious, but.. One of the major points visible
during virtually any one of these significant security events is the way
coordination works, how well processes are defined and how well they end up
working in terms of tactical
Hi,
Is anyone aware of a commodity ISP supporting end-to-end MTUs
greater than 4470 octets (e.g., a 9180 octet jumbo frame-clean
path, for example)?
Feel free to drop me a note directly; I'll summarize for the list
if I hear from anyone.
Thanks,
Joe St Sauver ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
University
I say to that...
http://www.ofcourseimright.com/~lear/fishbowl.jpg
My posted comment was concerning if this technology of layer3 to
layer1 integration/communication would have exacerbated the mSQL worm
as it might have had more ability to grab larger peering pipes.
Were that to have been the case, it would probably would also have
been responsible for some
Stephen Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Optical switch technology, and the control systems that cause the
technology to implement the business rules of an exchange point, have
a ways to go before they're ready for prime-time.
We don't know anything we could do with 50ms provisioning without
From: Stephen Stuart
Billing disputes in the exchange point now involve three parties, and
become more complex as a result - this, in theory, results in the
technology not reducing op-ex but shifting it from the operations
department to the accounting and legal departments.
If a proper
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in this. My question is why large providers couldn't interlink themselves
and establish guidelines for notification and resolution of network issues.
They manage it for peering, why not for overall performance and security
issues?
I'll get
From: Sean Donelan
snip
On the other hand, security is a much bigger win for a larger provider
than for a small provider. As Willie Sutton use to say, he robbed banks
because that's were the money was. Larger providers have more exposure,
and more to loose. Even a non-directed attack such
Of course, I realize that to implement the necessary rules would add a
complexity that could cost largs sums of money due to mistakes.
Implementing the automation that can (correctly) implement the
necessary rules is an enormous challenge, and it's unclear whether
anyone in the marketplace
We don't know anything we could do with 50ms provisioning without
making a disaster (c) smd 2001.
indeed. but i sure would like one or two day provisioning, as
opposed to 18 months.
The space where that problem exists is within and and at the edge of
carrier networks.
I think we
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
If a proper rulebased system were implemented, wouldn't this account for the
issues? For example, implementation of an increase is only allowed by peer E
if the traffic has been a gradual increase and X throughput has been met for
T amount of time. Peer
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
If my regular saturday morning traffic is 50 Mbps and a worm generates
another 100, then 150 Mbps is a valid need as being limited to my usual
50 Mbps would mean 67% packet loss, TCP sessions go into hibernation and
I end up with 49.9% Mbps of worm traffic.
But a
We have completed our preliminary analysis of the spread of the
Sapphire/Slammer SQL worm. This worm required roughly 10 minutes to
spread worldwide making it by far the fastest worm to date. In the
early stages the worm was doubling in size every 8.5 seconds. At its
peak, achieved
15 matches
Mail list logo
