David Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So actually thinking about this a bit more, our numbers count from
> when single well connected or a set of less well connected hosts
> are infected. If a single (or small number) of infected machines
> were on slow links (dsl/cable modem/etc) it
Can someone from VERISIGN contact me offline? I am a Sr. Network Engineer
for a 3 Billion/year enterprise and our Verisign CERT expired today (thank
you consultants!) and we are having issues getting a new one! Our commerce
Site is no longer accepting credit cards due to the expired cert.
Help
I'd like to thank everyone that emailed me information
about IPv6 calculators. It was much appreciated!
Regards,
Jeff
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003
Is there anyone that would be interested in providing a tunnel
to the 6bone for us? We are in Charlotte, NC and would prefer
to establish a tunnel with someone close by. We'd be doing this
via a cisco router so brokers are no an option for us. We are
AS8175.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff
---
Outgoing
Anyone clueful about multicast at UUnet on-list? I'm getting the telephone equivalent
of blank stares when I call in. I'm trying to find out if multicast services are
offered and how much $ We already have a ds-3 w/ uu.
Thanks,
Ejay
http://www.scienceblog.com/community/article1018.html
---
"The Internet is 'fault-tolerant,' so there are always many
routes a message can take. A packet of data traveling from
New York to San Francisco might go by way of Chicago or
Dallas, or might even hop from New York to Columbus to Miami
According to Wired, Symantec is now saying they sent out an alert to their
paying customers about 30 minutes (9pm PST) before the SQL slammer worm
was detected by anyone else around 9:30pm PST.
I have not seen a copy of the Symantec message.
The first problem report on Nanog was 13 minutes afte
Thus spake "Pete Kruckenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.scienceblog.com/community/article1018.html
> ---
> This might be easier to understand if it was more technical,
> but I'm only aware of a lot of disabled features on my
> routers that are supposed to in theory do some of these
> things
Talk to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy Hall)
(Who is / was a reader of NANOG)
or
Ron Leibfreid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
or
"Louis A. Mamakos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTW, they offer both native multicast and (maybe still) UUCAST, which
are NOT the same).
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 03:46 PM,
We operate a free IPv6 tunnel broker at http://tunnelbroker.com
Mike.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
>
> Is there anyone that would be interested in providing a tunnel
> to the 6bone for us? We are in Charlotte, NC and would prefer
> to establish a tunnel with someone close by. We'
Abstractions and analogies aside, is this really a problem,
and is it really worth solving? Sounds like a lot of
additional complexity for the supposed benefits.
A key comment to put this paper in perspective:
(from http://news.com.com/2100-1033-984694.html?tag=fd_top )
> "The extent to which
Can someone recommend a vendor for an OC3 to DS3 DACS or mux? I need a small
one with capacity for a single OC3.
Thanks,
Joe
Thus spake "Sean Finn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Chasing the last ms of optimization tends to both focus traffic
> on the single "best" link, as well as increasing the rate of route
> change as the "best" continually changes.
>
> Considering alternate paths with roughly similar performance
> significa
> "Roughgarden has a suggestion that wouldn't be expensive to implement.
so do i. forget all this "normal physics" nonsense and just use hyperspace.
> Before deciding which way to send information, he says, routers should
> consider not only which route seems the least congested, but also shoul
Basically, injecting current traffic state information into routing system
is a recipe for disaster. "Normal" flap due to equipment failures and
human interventions is bad enough already.
Somehow people in academia tend to underappreciate the sheer scale of the
Internet, and offer solutions whic
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
> Abstractions and analogies aside, is this really a problem,
> and is it really worth solving? Sounds like a lot of
> additional complexity for the supposed benefits.
When I read the article I didnt recognize anything in it that correlated
with my un
Thus spake "Mikael Abrahamsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> When I read the article I didnt recognize anything in it that correlated
> with my understanding as to how BGP et all works. Am I the only
> one who after reading it thought the author needs to cut back on
> whatever drugs he is taking?
>
> I h
On Fri Feb 14, 2003 at 06:09:36PM -0800, joe mcguckin wrote:
> Can someone recommend a vendor for an OC3 to DS3 DACS or mux? I need a small
> one with capacity for a single OC3.
This question seems to come up fairly often on the nanog list, you'll
probably find some answers in the archives.
But
On Fri Feb 14, 2003 at 10:03:12AM -0700, Aaron D. Britt wrote:
> Can someone from VERISIGN contact me offline?
Did you try calling them?
> I am a Sr. Network Engineer
> for a 3 Billion/year enterprise
Sorry, that's supposed to make us want to help you more? ;-)
> and our Verisign CERT expire
19 matches
Mail list logo
