This week's puzzle ... What is symmetry?
The mail relay for a defunct ISP with some 20k users has between 100k and 200k
instances of sendmail journaled per day. At any point in time, there are about
1k entries in the host's proctable, 80% are the MTA, and a few connections/sec
to port 25, with
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 02:24, David Schwartz wrote:
The laws require an intent to conceal the origin or
destination. NAT would not count, as the intent is to share a scarce
resource, not to conceal the origin or destination -- the origin is
only concealed to the extent necessary to
Local root vulnerability in sendmail.
See http://www.netsys.com/cgi-bin/displaynews?a=556
which contains links to:
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-March/008972.html
http://www.netsys.com/library/alerts/sendmail-2003-03-29.txt
In spite of typo's in their DNS records, Al Jazeera's web site has moved
to France and back online. Be sure you get the current IP address for
aljazeera.net (213.30.180.219).
Al Jazeera's name server records are still a mess, and I don't think
you can really blame the Pentagon for them
Declan McCullagh sent out an email 7:56 am EST this morning,
referencing his full report at:
http://news.com.com/2100-1028-994667.html
I was shocked to see that Michigan has *already* passed such a law!
(Also Virginia, Delaware, and Illinois.)
I've found the new law(s), and they basically
WAS Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:53:32 -0500
WAS From: William Allen Simpson
[ snip ]
IANAL, but VPNs look like trouble waiting to happen. And then
there's promiscuous mode...
Eddy
--
Brotsman Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network
William Allen Simpson wrote:
It outlaws all encryption, and all remailers.
I'm missing where it outlaws these? In fact, it outlaws others (say your
ISP) from decryping your encrypted data.
It outlaws connecting any device without the express authority of the
telecommunications service
JB Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 23:22:11 -0600
JB From: Jack Bates
[ snip ]
JB One thing to note, a telecommunications service provider is defined in
JB such a way that anyone running a network is included. This means that
JB running a business or home network protects your network. If in the
JB
- Original Message -
From: Jack Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, March 30, 2003 0:22 am
Subject: Re: State Super-DMCA Too True
(Some DSL/cable companies try to charge per machine, and record
the
machine address of the devices connected.)
And to use NAT to circumvent
On Saturday, 2003-03-29 at 23:22 CST, Jack Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
William Allen Simpson wrote:
(Some DSL/cable companies try to charge per machine, and record the
machine address of the devices connected.)
And to use NAT to circumvent this should be illegal. It is theft of
10 matches
Mail list logo
