Re: Independent space from ARIN

2003-04-12 Thread Steve Gibbard
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Dan Hollis wrote: Would like to hear from anyone who purchased independent address space from ARIN, what issues you had (technical, or otherwise). First, to satisfy those who care deeply about terminology, you don't purchase IP address space from ARIN. You have space

Re: Hijacking of address blocks assigned to Trafalgar House Group, London UK

2003-04-12 Thread bdragon
Hello! I've been asked to draw the attention of Network administrators to the recent hijacking of various large blocks of ARIN IP-space: particularly six /16 blocks allocated to the London-based Trafalgar House Group. Trafalgar House Group (THG): Trafalgar House Group TRAF

Re: Independent space from ARIN

2003-04-12 Thread Jack Bates
Dan Hollis wrote: Has anyone run into problems with routing though? If you get space from a tier1, presumably they have agreements with those they peer with to aceept traffic from those netblocks. That's the SOA clause. In reality, most routes are accepted even at /24 lengths. The larger

Re: Independent space from ARIN

2003-04-12 Thread bdragon
Some of you *might* remember a rant I posted here several years ago about getting our first allocation from ARIN...many here suggested that I call ARIN and get clarification on the allocation (ie, they gave me a /20 when I offered to renumber out of a /20 plus a smattering of other

Re: Independent space from ARIN

2003-04-12 Thread bdragon
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Steve Gibbard wrote: There aren't really technical issues with this beyond what you'd have to deal with with normal IP space. If you're running BGP, you'll have to announce the space and get filters updated to allow it, but you have to do that with a block of IP

Re: Independent space from ARIN

2003-04-12 Thread Jeff McAdams
Also Sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] So, you didn't renumber out of PA space into PI space and then upon hitting 80% utilization asking for additional PI space, which would have been justified at such point? I was *EXPLICITLY* told that renumbering wasn't an issue. Additionally, I only applied for