Re: AS1880 - AS1883 - What are they?

2003-06-04 Thread William Allen Simpson
Jeffrey Meltzer wrote: > > Appears to be Peter Lothberg, I guess it is legit.. > Ha! Knowing him, more likely to be a joke than legit! > http://www.stupi.se > > How about next time we do a quick lookup, and maybe try and contact the > listed contact before wasting everyones time? > Maybe th

Re: AS1880 - AS1883 - What are they?

2003-06-04 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, William Allen Simpson wrote: I guess I now begin to understand why the IETF has to push ASNs to 32 bits. It's all one big technical joke. -Hank > > Jeffrey Meltzer wrote: > > > > Appears to be Peter Lothberg, I guess it is legit.. > > > Ha!Knowing him, more likely to be a

Re: BFD preso

2003-06-04 Thread Susan Harris
> Will the Bidirectional Forwarding Plane presentation be put online? This > is really valuable stuff but it's hard to see on the video. Sorry - it's there now!

Re: AS1880 - AS1883 - What are they?

2003-06-04 Thread William Allen Simpson
William Allen Simpson wrote: > Maybe that's good advice in general, but this was a nice humorous > anecdote that brought back fond memories I remember his high > bandwidth link -- to the bathroom (T3? OC3?). > http://www.stupi.se/Bilder/6014-1652-2950/gif/img0073.gif "The main office of STU

Re: pool.ntp.org NTP servers

2003-06-04 Thread wayne
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phillip Vandry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:41:39AM -0500, wayne wrote: >> >> This seems like a good time to put in a plug for the pool.ntp.org NTP >> servers. This is collection of public ntp servers provided by >> individuals and ISP's placed

AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Matthew Zito
Hello, This is marginally related to the power discussions earlier, but does anyone know of a product that steps up 120V AC to 220V AC and is reasonably datacenter-friendly? We're looking at an environment where there's no 220V available - but we only need ~7 amps so conversion could be possibl

Re: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Dominic J. Eidson
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > Hi, > seems some spammers are using one of my personal domains as the from > field in their emails, the local-part being random so I cant easily > block it. FWIW, I'm having a feeling that someone harvested a bunch of adresses, possibly from NANO

Re: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Jack Bates
Dominic J. Eidson wrote: I'm having a feeling that someone harvested a bunch of adresses, possibly from NANOG, and is using them as the sender address in pretend-to-be KLEZ spams.. I have received several bounces lately, several of them appearing to be KLEZ, all with me as the original sender - and

Re: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Dominic J. Eidson
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jack Bates wrote: > Dominic J. Eidson wrote: > > I'm having a feeling that someone harvested a bunch of adresses, possibly > > from NANOG, and is using them as the sender address in pretend-to-be KLEZ > > spams.. I have received several bounces lately, several of them appearin

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Peter Galbavy
Matthew Zito wrote: > This is marginally related to the power discussions earlier, but does > anyone know of a product that steps up 120V AC to 220V AC and is > reasonably datacenter-friendly? We're looking at an environment where > there's no 220V available - but we only need ~7 amps so conversi

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Neil J. McRae
Have a look at www.baytechdcd.com - they +might+ have something. Neil

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Jay Hennigan
On Tue, 2 Jun 2003, Matthew Zito wrote: > This is marginally related to the power discussions earlier, but does > anyone know of a product that steps up 120V AC to 220V AC and is > reasonably datacenter-friendly? We're looking at an environment where > there's no 220V available - but we only nee

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Peter Galbavy wrote: > > Matthew Zito wrote: > > This is marginally related to the power discussions earlier, but does > > anyone know of a product that steps up 120V AC to 220V AC and is > > reasonably datacenter-friendly? We're looking at an environment where > > there's

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Simon Lockhart
On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 08:48:45PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > Depends on your hardware obviously but I suspect it'll be cheaper to replace the > PSU with one of the same voltage as the supply than messing with ups etc As you say, depends on the hardware, but take for example the Cisco GSR

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Matthew Zito wrote: > This is marginally related to the power discussions earlier, but does > anyone know of a product that steps up 120V AC to 220V AC and is > reasonably datacenter-friendly? We're looking at an environment where > there's no 220V available - but we only nee

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Robert Boyle
At 02:20 PM 6/3/2003 -0400, Matthew Zito wrote: This is marginally related to the power discussions earlier, but does anyone know of a product that steps up 120V AC to 220V AC and is reasonably datacenter-friendly? We're looking at an environment where there's no 220V available - but we only need

Metoo Was: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Daniel Karrenberg
On 03.06 13:44, Dominic J. Eidson wrote: > > I'm having a feeling that someone harvested a bunch of adresses, possibly > from NANOG, and is using them as the sender address in pretend-to-be KLEZ > spams.. I have received several bounces lately, several of them appearing > to be KLEZ, all with me

Re: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:13:58 CDT, "Dominic J. Eidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On the flip side, maybe there's still entirely too many people running > vulnerable email readers... Our virus scanners set a new one-day record yesterday by catching 105,745 copies of Sobig.C - so there's certainl

Re: Metoo Was: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
Mine are not klez And the email domain is not one I've ever sent to nanog, its an old private domain Steve On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > On 03.06 13:44, Dominic J. Eidson wrote: > > > > I'm having a feeling that someone harvested a bunch of adresses, possibly > > from NA

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Vadim Antonov
Here's a 3KW one for E389: http://www.taunus-transformatoren.de/transformers/transformers_110_120_220_230_240.htmlMatthew Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, (Actually, you don't need a two-coil transformer - a one-coil transformer with a tap in the middle will do, and those may be even cheaper). Note

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread Vadim Antonov
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Vadim Antonov wrote: http://www.pfsc-ice.com/bbo/b/magnet/get_a_110_220_voltage_transformer_11.htm 2KW - for less than $100 ... enough for 8.5 Amp at 230V. --vadim

Re: Metoo Was: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:20 PM 03/06/2003 +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: On 03.06 13:44, Dominic J. Eidson wrote: > > I'm having a feeling that someone harvested a bunch of adresses, possibly > from NANOG, and is using them as the sender address in pretend-to-be KLEZ > spams.. I have received several bounces lately

Re: AC/AC power conversion for datacenters

2003-06-04 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > > > Hello, > > This is marginally related to the power discussions earlier, but does > anyone know of a product that steps up 120V AC to 220V AC and is > reasonably datacenter-friendly? We're looking at an environment where > the

SUMMARY: BGP Analytics

2003-06-04 Thread Timothy Brown
I want to thank everyone for the volume of responses I received on this topic. I was already aware of the work the Akamai and Sockeye keiretsus were doing with BGP analysis, but thanks for the pointers. I was also familiar with CAIDA's efforts. Nick Feamster and Dave Andersen (lcs.mit.edu) h

Thank you

2003-06-04 Thread Pete Kruckenberg
Thank you to everyone who attended NANOG 28 in Salt Lake City. We enjoyed hosting the conference and hope you enjoyed your time in Salt Lake. See you in October. Pete.

Re: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox

2003-06-04 Thread Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS
It would be really bad form to use BGP to advertise a specific route to their hosts and DNS server, and if you're not a Tier 1 provider your advertisements would probably be blocked anyway. While using the main Bogon list isn't really appropriate either, it's a problem that's becoming increasing

Re: Clocking Sources (was NTp sources that work in a datacenter (was Re: Is latency equivalentto RTT?))

2003-06-04 Thread Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS
Some of you are telecom types who think "Stratum 1" is telco clocking SONET/SDH/T1/E1 kind of timing that's 10**-11 accurate but doesn't know or care what time of day it is. Stratum 3/Stratum 4 SONET accuracy is a couple orders of magnitude lower. And wander (<10Hz) matters, but jitter doesn't ma

Re: Fast TCP?

2003-06-04 Thread Allan Liska
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Mike Leber wrote: > > > Does anybody know any more about Fast TCP: > > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=581&ncid=581&e=6&u=/nm/20030604/tc_nm/technology_internet_dc_3 > > Is it real? > > It it open source? &

RE: Fast TCP?

2003-06-04 Thread Christopher J. Wolff
IMHO, the way the article reads it sounds like an implementation of dynamic window sizing. Regards, Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO Broadband Laboratories, Inc. http://www.bblabs.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Leber Sent: Wednesda

RE: Fast TCP?

2003-06-04 Thread Deepak Jain
> Glad this came up as I have been reading this paper - > > Does Figure 1 in > > http://netlab.caltech.edu/pub/papers/fast-030401.pdf > > seem reasonable ? Will 100 RED TCP flows really only fill 90% of a 155 > Mbps pipe but 87% of a 2.4 Gbps connection > and 75% of a 4.8 Gbps connection ? This