Reactive fall down go boom... Last I heard there were less than 5 people
still on staff and there was no further development going on - pending
another round of VC money.. This grasp at any possible revenue seems to back
up that rumor. Too bad, was an almost decent concept.
.chance
> -Or
On 6/9/2003 at 4:06 PM, "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, you are announcing 196.1.1.0/24 and only that, fine, but are you
> allowed to announce that prefix? Are you "Centre for Monitoring Indian
> Economy" ?? Or is this your direct customer and you are just the sat-link
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:03:18PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a high speed (300-1000Mbps) IPSec solution. I need
> basic functionality only, a frame in one side pops out the other
> side. For the moment I don't care if this is a layer 2 or a layer
> 3 device. For the applic
Sean,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Donelan) [Mon 09 Jun 2003, 22:03 CEST]:
>
> Interesting title. Has anyone heard who is on the witness list?
>
> http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=801
> The Senate Committee on the Judiciary will hold a hearing on Wednesday,
> June 11, 2003, at 2:00 p.m.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a high speed (300-1000Mbps) IPSec solution. I need
http://www.cipheroptics.com/
Gig-in/Gig-out - Wirespeed - reasonably priced last I asked.
I can give you my contact if your interested.
andy
--
PGP Key Available at http://www.tig
Hello all,
I think I've given everyone enough time to chime in on this one. I only
got a handful of replies, and they are mostly in favor of Telehouse.
I also heard from a Telehouse rep, who states that there is a project in
progress to connect NYIIX to TelX. No details yet. I don't think the
Andy Dills wrote:
What sorts of 'unique' routing policies justify an ASN?
ISP has a corporate customer that decides to multi-home. While ISP is
not multi-homed themselves, they must have an ASN to speak BGP and pass
routing information between their corporate customer and their provider.
So an
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, John Brown wrote:
> Fear leads to Hate, which leads to Evil, the way of the darkside ;)
>
> RIR's are not and should not be in the business of dictating what
> goes into the routing table, or what label is used on what goes
> into the routing table.
Certainly not, but if the
I'm looking for a high speed (300-1000Mbps) IPSec solution. I need
basic functionality only, a frame in one side pops out the other
side. For the moment I don't care if this is a layer 2 or a layer
3 device. For the application in mind it's just between two points.
I need a supported product,
Interesting title. Has anyone heard who is on the witness list?
http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=801
The Senate Committee on the Judiciary will hold a hearing on Wednesday,
June 11, 2003, at 2:00 p.m. in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Building, on
"The Dark Side of a Bright Idea: Coul
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:04:22PM -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
> > excellent point :) the distinction between 'good' and 'bad' was just
> > non-abuser/abuser. Certianly ARIN's requirements for ASN ownership are
> > simple enough, be multihomed
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:57:17PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> Speaking as someone who is extremely annoyed by providers/peers/etc proxy
> registering IRR routes, I think a system which locks down registrations
> within specific prefixes to a specific maintainer, and an approval system
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 06:06:50PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
>
> RIPE at least uses a hierarchical authorisation scheme which means you
> cannot register routes to an ASN and prefix you dont have authorisation
> on, where authorisation on those blocks is passed down from supernets
> and sup
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Michel Py wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > excellent point :) the distinction between 'good' and 'bad' was
> > just non-abuser/abuser. Certianly ARIN's requirements for ASN
> > ownership are simple enough, be multihomed and have a 'unique'
> > routing po
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, james wrote:
>
> Thanks to those who indicated all I need is a relay and some diodes,
> that I know ! I am more looking for black box that does this and is
> NEBS approved.
Courtesy of Sean Donelan when I asked about this 6-7 months ago...
See http://www.enewton.com/
You just need two suitably large diodes. Big ones need heatsinks.
You will find some of the rack-top fuse panel makers that include diode "OR-ing" their
main A and B feeds. No switchover time at
all. The power is just there.
Pretty sure Telect has some. Beware of Hendry. Good stuff, but savagel
Thanks to those who indicated all I need is a relay and some diodes,
that I know ! I am more looking for black box that does this and is
NEBS approved.
james
I got this because I down-loaded from them. This is a very useful hammer for IDS,
Firewalls, DoS devices etc.
"The toolkit created to generate huge loads against test servers for product
development is for sale. It is called i408, and can generate up to 1000 concurrent
two-way HTML connecti
I have a device that only has one DC power input. Is there a box that
can accept an A & B DC leg, keep both isolated, & and feed my
device with just A or B ? ie, if the A or B leg fails at the co-lo
this blackbox will switch to what ever leg is up. Quickly, I hope !
Or are there other ways to sol
> > Since the RIRs contain the information required to answer those
> > questions, you'd expect them (or their data) to be involved in the
> > process of answering them.
>
> They really don't. Thus far, when space is assigned, the RIRs have no way
> to later authenticate that an organization
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> excellent point :) the distinction between 'good' and 'bad' was just
> non-abuser/abuser. Certianly ARIN's requirements for ASN ownership are
> simple enough, be multihomed and have a 'unique' routing policy. If you
> need an ASN likely you are a
On Monday, Jun 9, 2003, at 12:53 Canada/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the RIRs contain the information required to answer those
questions, you'd expect them (or their data) to be involved in the
process of answering them.
They really don't. Thus far, when space is assigned, the RIRs h
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Joe Abley wrote:
> The ISP in Toronto asked for an LOA, and got one, neatly presented on
> company letterhead, and accompanied by e-mail from the tech contact for
> the block confirming that the request to advertise the block was
> authorised.
>
> Is that enough justificat
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Michel Py wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > So, for an example, if I steal ASN 8143 (already stolen so its
> > mute) and I'm 'a good guy', all I want to do is run a network
> > no spam/abuse eminates from it,
>
> Question: if you are a 'good guy', why did
On Monday, Jun 9, 2003, at 02:36 Canada/Eastern, John Brown wrote:
RIR's are not and should not be in the business of dictating what
goes into the routing table, or what label is used on what goes
into the routing table.
Just the other day I heard of a new customer of an ISP in Toronto who
had
Well as some of you know as of late I've been involved in investigations of
number of hijacked ip blocks (about 40 and looking at more) and can tell
you that for greater majority of companies (especially for companies that
had /16s but even for companies that had /24) the records on internet do
26 matches
Mail list logo
