Its been a few years since I looked at network discovery and mapping
tools. Openview/et al did the job, but was always a pain to move all
the boxes to the right spots on the resulting maps.
Has network discovery and mapping improved for medium-scale wide
area networks for ISPs (e.g. 1,000
Sunday, June 22, 2003, 7:58:39 AM, Sean wrote:
Its been a few years since I looked at network discovery and mapping
tools. Openview/et al did the job, but was always a pain to move all
the boxes to the right spots on the resulting maps.
Has network discovery and mapping improved for
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
Has network discovery and mapping improved for medium-scale wide
area networks for ISPs (e.g. 1,000 networks, 100,000 network devices)?
I've found lots of discovery tools, but intelligent mapping/layout still
seems to be a problem. The usual
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
That's quite a medium-scale.
Is there a single entity in the world that controls 1,000 networks and
100,000 network devices?
WorldCom^Hn
--
Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]| I route
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:16:38PM -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
Has network discovery and mapping improved for medium-scale wide
area networks for ISPs (e.g. 1,000 networks, 100,000 network devices)?
I've found lots of discovery tools, but
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
Its been a few years since I looked at network discovery and mapping
tools. Openview/et al did the job, but was always a pain to move all
the boxes to the right spots on the resulting maps.
Has network discovery and mapping improved for
Not sure how relevent this may be but:
Interland has recently been in a major network
move
They boight out Communitech and are in the
process of moving datacenters to the Interland
centers..
This could explain it
But they should be doing a better job of it though...
Jim
-Original
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
That's quite a medium-scale.
Is there a single entity in the world that controls 1,000 networks and
100,000 network devices?
WorldCom^Hn
Well, sure, MCI is a single company that owns that many
Mike wrote:
We're receiving multiple complaints about problems reaching anything
@bt. Is anyone else experiencing this?
GrrrThree days later, BT is now telling their customers that
somehow, this is our fault. I find it rather odd that everyone in the
world can reach us,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You appear to be excessively deaggregating your space. Perhaps they
are doing the responsible thing by filtering it?
I had a /20 from which BT was unreachable, and a /24 working just fine,
so this seems doubtful, unless they are doing it to be spiteful and
punitive
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
That's quite a medium-scale.
Is there a single entity in the world that controls 1,000 networks and
100,000 network devices?
Its a bit like the fish that got away. People have varying ideas about
how big is big. Its smaller than the Internet, but
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 09:24:58PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
gaps between entities I'm interested in mapping. I want to discover
and map the connections indviduals may know about, but no one realized
how all the pieces were connected.
So far the recommendations have included
[...]
I'm
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
I dunno, there are plenty of smaller ASes who have yet to be forced to
register their routes.
We haven't yet been forced, but I finally got motivated to submit them to
altdb last night. Altdb definitely rocks.
Back when I got PI space in 1998, there
13 matches
Mail list logo
