On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Christopher L. Morrow") writes:
>
> > There are many cases in which the backbone can't determine the 'proper'
> > traffic an edge is sending in.
>
> i'd like to discuss these, or see them discussed. networks have edges,
> even if so
>> The web of trusted email servers would use a new and improved mail
>> transfer protocol (NIMTP) that would only be used to exchange email
>> between trusted servers. Users could continue to use authenticated SMTP
to
>> initiate the sending of email, but nobody would accept any
unauthenticated
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:25:47AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > For those of you that are doing IPv6 deployments, might I suggest
> > you also take the time to do the same?I know that Cisco has v6 u-rpf
> > support already.
>
> but not netflow
> ... tried to silence the door audible alarm
Didn't it have battery backup? Inquiring minds want to know.
Can anyone tell me where I can get the recent statistics of Internet
connection speeds? Specifically, I need statistics for edge link bandwidth
(e.g., what's the percentage of 56kbps lines?)
Thanks a million.
M. S. Kwon
Hi, NANOGers.
] leaving the spoofing option open for future generations of attacks,
] rather than having a witch-hunt and tracking down and upgrading every
] insecure edge, is just about the worst thing we could do.
When I first looked at this problem back in March 2001, I did a
study of one oft
>At the moment we are looking for a good badwidth test within your network
to test the line and to see if the customer gets what he has asked/paid
for.
Have you tried pathload/pathrate?
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/Constantinos.Dovrolis/bw.html
Pathchirp is another possibility
http://www.spin
