Re: Server Redundancy

2003-08-11 Thread Rob Pickering
--On 07 August 2003 08:29 +0100 Simon Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The gated solution sounds interesting, but doesn't automatically have the feedback loop of stopping advertising itself when apache stops responding, but the box is still up (which is a fairly common occurrence in our

RE: RPC errors

2003-08-11 Thread Kevin Houle
--On Monday, August 11, 2003 02:26:40 PM -0700 Mike Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The DCOM exploit that is floating around crashes the Windows RPC service when the attacker closes the connection to your system after a successful attack. Best bet is to assume any occurrence of crashing RPC

Re: RPC errors

2003-08-11 Thread Jack Bates
Mark Segal wrote: I just put an access list on one of our cores with some spare cpu cycles.. And 10% of the traffic looks like port 135 calls. Anyone else see this? Did I break anything legitimate? There is legitimate use for 135, although normally it is not used in the wild much. From what