I think that the number of people showing that they oppose Verisign would
still carry the day on the meaning of the tomatoes and red shirts. Verisign
could try to delude themselves into believing it was ambiguous, but, I don't
think the press or the attendees would buy it.
Also, I don't think
By my count there have been 23 odd messages in which the subject contains
the word tomatoes, this is out of 96 messages I've recieved on this list
since midnight pdt. Isn't there something more useful people on this list
could be doing.
joelja
--
In reference to some earlier politically active days:
Hey! Hey! Ver - i - sign !
How Many Domains Do You Think Are Thine?
Hilton
lots of misconceptions here today. declan, you ought to pay closer attention.
verisign didn't say at the meeting yesterday that they were planning to revive
the redirect service, in fact they used the term if or when when describing
their plans in that area. furthermore they did not commit to a
On the topic of announcing PA /24's, what procedures do you take to make
sure that a new customer who want's to announce a few PA (P being one or
more P's other than yourself) IP space is legit and should be announcing
that IP space?
I'm not sure what they do internally, but I know Sprint,
http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/security/story/0,248600,20279775,00.htm
Backdoor Trojan behind BigPond, Internet spam woes
By Andrew Colley, ZDNet Australia
15 October 2003
U.S.-based Internet security researchers have confirmed that a worm is
behind the sharp jump in spam activity
On 16 Oct 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
Good writeup Paul.
SNIP
To change this: what else can we do to prevent this? Does the last BIND
version truly break sitefinder?
in my last conversation with a verisign executive, i learned that there is a
widely held misconception that the last BIND
i just got done reading http://news.com.com/2008-7347_3-5092590.html,
so now at least i know why my phone was ringing so much earlier today.
anyway, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ken emery) quotes me as saying...
let me just emphasize that the default is OFF. BIND doesn't break
sitefinder; nameserver
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Vixie
Sent: October 16, 2003 7:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [IP] VeriSign to revive redirect service]
ken is right and i apologize for the confusion. most of the
early
jlewis wrote:
On the topic of announcing PA /24's, what procedures do
you take to make sure that a new customer who want's to
announce a few PA (P being one or more P's other than
yourself) IP space is legit and should be announcing
that IP space?
I'm also interested in hearing current
Paul Vixie wrote:
While I agree that handling of NXDOMAIN needs to improve, such handling
must be done by the application. Popular browsers have already started ...
i think i agree with where this was going, but it would be a fine thing if
we all stop calling this NXDOMAIN. the proper term is
That is a positive note, hopefully the new group will give us a public statement
of its intentions.
-HenryMark Vallar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just got this email from Network Solutions...Hm--mvalFrom: Network Solutions, Inc.[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:31
A proposal was made some years ago, which I thought was by Tony Li,
but, IIRC, he says it wasn't original with him. It does require
cooperation from competitors, but can reduce the number of
announcements. Under some circumstances, it may cause blackholing,
but so can /24 filtering.
The idea
May I suggest.
pumpkins
A pumpkin per complainant would make a nice visual symbol,
one the press could grasp.
And afterwards, they could be donated
--
A host is a host from coast to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no one will talk to a host that's close[v].(301) 56-LINUX
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Wayne E. Bouchard wrote:
Yes, I will heartily agree with this. Having this functionality be
triggered by a wildcard in the DNS records is the wrong approach. It's
the application that should be taking care of this
if (NXDOMAIN)
redirect(preferences-sitefinder_host,
Showing our displeasure to Verisign (and potentially getting media coverage which
explains why nanog-l posters are mad at verisign) is indeed operational... Unless you
enjoy monopolistic corporations breaking significant features of the Internet without
prior notice?
At 03:30 PM 10/16/2003
Gerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having been a part of many fraternity pranks along this line, I might
remind some of a glitch with this line of thinking.
VeriSign employees read this list. (Verisign shows up with tomatoes red
I love VeriSign shirts saying if you like the idea...wear shirt
At 09:27 PM 10/16/2003, you wrote:
I agree that an application level solution at the edge is the best.
I like the idea of having a user configurable parameter in the client
browser to allow the ``finder'' URL to be set. The browser
``manufacturer'' would of course put their own default and the
On Oct 16, 2003, at 9:39 PM, Dan Riley wrote:
snip
And write your congressmen to explain how Verisign is abusing a
government granted monopoly to stop others (including M$ and AOL) from
innovating at the edge, because that's where this is headed--Verisign
is ultimately counting on having better
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
