http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/1027ddos.html
-Hank
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> somewhat smoky skies in Santa Barbara, much worse in Ventura. UPSes
> are beeping and lights flickering a bit more often than usual. Otherwise
> no real network impact here.
California electric grid operators are reporting 70,000 to 80,000
customers ar
Gaurab Raj Upadhaya writes on 10/27/2003 11:49 PM:
HKIX would be your best bet, considering it's connectivity to Far East,
Pacific, South East, South Asia as well as west Asia both over fiber
and satellite. It's also a more competitive market than Singapore or
Seoul - more bang for you buck.
L
>* But customers of broadband ISP aren't going to want to pay more than
$40 a
>month for any such thing you add,
You are right about the average customer. But this mythical beast is
composed of some less than average customers who just want plain
vanilla cheap service and some more than average
>Some would ask, "What about increasing address usage?"
Only the ones who weren't at the ARIN meeting in
Chicago where we saw a chart showing that monthly
consumption of IP addresses continues to decrease
as it has since around the year 2000.
>I would ask, "What evidence do you have that usage
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:58:20AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/1027ddos.html
Love this quote from Verisign:
"We tested Anycast for about a year...to monitor its behavior,"
Silva says. "These are important servers, and we didn't want to
make any rash decis
> >> Does anybody honestly think companies will commit the
> capex needed to
> >> implement IPv6?
>
> > William Leibzon wrote:
> > Not without additional benefits.
>
> I agree, and they're all gone now. To my deepest regrets,
> IPv6 has become nothing more than IPv4 with more bits (it's
> ac
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
> Excuse my rambling and what some may consider heresy even :), but..
> One question to ask is whether IPv6's approach is the right one, furthering
> a particular way of doing things rather than really reinventing itself. Do
> I really need global aw
At 11:13 AM 10/23/2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
How many other ISPs intend to follow AOL's practice and use their
connection support software to fix the defaults on their customer's
Windows computers?
Interesting question from several angles. Here's the flip side. Our
corporate IT department likes t
End-to-end requires that people writing the software at the end learn about
buffer overruns (and other data-driven access violations) or program using
tools that prevent such things. It is otherwise an excellent idea.
Unfortunately, the day that someone decided their poorly-designed machine
and o
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The bottom line is that there are three different models
> which may predict when we run out of IPv4 addresses. The
> models predict dates ranging from 2022 to 2045. None of
> the models predict an exact year, they all predict a range
> of 4 to 8 yea
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> End-to-end requires that people writing the software at the end learn about
> buffer overruns (and other data-driven access violations) or program using
> tools that prevent such things. It is otherwise an excellent idea.
A lack of end-to-end just ob
I'm looking into doing some research that will make use of GBICs(Gigabit Interface
Converters),
but I need to know how many of you are using GBICs in your networks?
If you are using them, where do they fit into your topology?
-Lance-
Agilent Laboratories
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:48:01AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm looking into doing some research that will make use of GBICs(Gigabit Interface
> Converters),
> but I need to know how many of you are using GBICs in your networks?
> If you are using them, where do they fit into your topol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Dills wrote:
| On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|>The bottom line is that there are three different models
|>which may predict when we run out of IPv4 addresses. The
|>models predict dates ranging from 2022 to 2045. None of
|>the m
> > Yes, because IPv6 is merely and incremental improvement, not a grand
> > elegant solution to world hunger like ATM. Look at how we managed the
> > incremental step of adding MPLS to our IPv4 networks. It was fairly
> > painless because it uses the same boxes, the same people and the same
> > m
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:48:01AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm looking into doing some research that will make use of GBICs(Gigabit Interface
> Converters),
interesting info too: http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/wodelet.html
> but I need to know how many of you are using GBICs in you
Need more info go here http://www.spaceweather.com/
it has a embeded link that explains affects on communications too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Scott Granados
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:32 PM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: Roy; Chris Yarn
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:48:01AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm looking into doing some research that will make use of GBICs(Gigabit Interface
> Converters),
> but I need to know how many of you are using GBICs in your networks?
> If you are using them, where do they fit into your top
Matthew Kaufman wrote:
End-to-end requires that people writing the software at the end learn about
buffer overruns (and other data-driven access violations) or program using
tools that prevent such things. It is otherwise an excellent idea.
There is supposedly some magic going into this in the
Many thanks to the dozens of folks who took time to offer me advice on
coloing in the Asia-Pacific and EU. I've had recommendations to look
at the following providers:
hong kong: pbase.net, at&t
singapore: singtel, at&t
korea: kidc
japan: jpix
Joe and Bill recommeded the PAIX. Not a bad idea fro
Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
I'm not saying IPv6 is dead, but I think a leap, rather than an incremental
improvement may be needed. Unless somebody actually does come up with an
IPv6 killer app...
Most Internet traffic is p2p traffic. IPv6 (by virtue of eliminating
most perceived needs for NAT d
To be more clear, I'm specifically referring to Gigabit Ethernet Converters and not
SFPs for POS or SONET. So, to reprhase, where in your network topology, are you
using Gigabit Ethernet, specifically GE interfaces using GBICS?
Are you using GE primarily for customer connections, server connecti
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To be more clear, I'm specifically referring to Gigabit Ethernet
> Converters and not SFPs for POS or SONET. So, to reprhase, where in
> your network topology, are you using Gigabit Ethernet, specifically GE
> interfaces using GBICS?
I think you alr
Another flare headed our way...
Event #49 - 28 October 2003
Issued: 16:30 UTC, 28 October 2003
SOURCE EVENT
Class X17.2 Flare in Region 486 at 11:10 UTC on 28 October 2003
Type II: 1250 km/sec
Estimated LASCO-derived Plane of Sky Velocity: 2125 km/sec
ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL OF SHOCK AT EAR
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Fred Baker wrote:
> Personally, I don't ask my ISP or my IT department to randomly change the
> configuration of my computer. I am very happy for them to suggest changes,
> but *if* I agree, *I* want to install them when it is convenient for *me*,
> not when it is convenient f
I agree that changing one's computer is not the ISP or even the Corp IT departments
job, and could compromise valuable work and or personal information for the individual
user, depending on their setup, security software etc and other applications.
I also would preceive that as a real threat to i
I'm just curious as to what kind of question it is... apologies if I sound rude
to you.. but...
What difference does this question make from following:
"I am doing a research about GigE connectivity. How many people use Gigabit
PCI NIC's in their servers, and where in your systems division do yo
I think if program design criterion would change, to coding secure applications then
the problem would be reduced dramatically
-HenryPetri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Kaufman wrote:>End-to-end requires that people writing the software at the end learn about>buffer overruns (and ot
GBIC's are something I put on board level products here is a list to make you
happy http://www.mrv.com/products/matrix_op.phpAndy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> The bottom line is that there are three different models> which may predict when we run ou
>>and operating system would be safer sitting behind a "firewall"
>>pretty much marked the end of universal end-to-end connectivity,
>>and I don't see it
An OS-level (software) firewall doesn't preclude end-to-end connectivity,
and even a per-machine hardware firewall doesn't given it can pass in
Folks
I URGENTLY need a phone number or other immediate contact for a Merit NOC
contact particularly re the raddb system!!
Like Now, actually.
Correspond privately for my phone number if necessary!!!
Narelle Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:28:55 CST, Adam Selene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> A probably configured firewall will protect a machine against everything but
> it's user, and therein lies a problem you will likely never solve.
The real problem is that we have an environment where the malware can figure
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:28:55 CST, Adam Selene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > A probably configured firewall will protect a machine against
> everything but
> > it's user, and therein lies a problem you will likely never solve.
>
> The real problem is that we have an environment where the malwa
34 matches
Mail list logo
