anyone from lewis university?

Lewis University (lewisu.edu) users are having problems connecting to my mailserver. Unfortunately, I can't get them to send me any useful traceroutes - they all die at the second RFC1918 hop. Anyways, if you're out there, can you contact me offlist? -- matthew zeier - "Nothing in life is to

Re: Nachi claims another college: Dartmouth November 7

At 08:10 AM 11/11/2003, Scott Weeks wrote: On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Sean Donelan wrote: : Almost half of all student computers on Dartmouth's campus have been : infected by the Nachi/Welchia worm. If student's do not fix their : Has anyone figured out a way to get computer users to fix their computer

Re: law enforcement contacts

At 11:23 PM 11/10/2003, Dave Stewart wrote: At 02:13 AM 11/11/2003, J. Oquendo wrote: Uhm... Correct me if I missed something, but LEO's get paid to uphold the law BY ACTING on crime in their expertise and if it's out of their range (juridstiction) an `LEO` should have better contacts than someone

Re: [Re: Fun new policy at AOL]

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:47:42 -0500, joshua sahala wrote: >i'm still curious to know how this mail will be automagically rejected... NOT automatically rejected. It takes an act of management will. That is the point. More comments in due course. Late now . . . caffeine and sugar levels low in

Re: [Re: Fun new policy at AOL]

"Dr. Jeffrey Race" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The proposal at provides that > mail from compromised sources shall be rejected. This forces the host > sysadmin to secure his system if he wants to communicate with the rest > of the internet. Pr

Re: Fun new policy at AOL

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:05:50 +0100 (BST), Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: >On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Dr. Jeffrey Race wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:07:30 -0400, Matthew Crocker wrote: >> >It can be built without choke points. ISPs could form trust >> >relationships with each other and bypass the central

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

While it's a more common thing to do with hosts, there are a number of reasons you might want a router with multiple interfaces on the same network. - Sometimes ugly things happen during reconfigurations, e.g. replacing two routers with one bigger one. Load balancing is more likely to want two i

Re: need contact for verio radb

http://info.us.bb.verio.net/vrr.html On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:47:57PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I need to give somebody contact for verio routing database to have several > of the database entries removed from there (they have beenadded without > consent of ip block administrat

need contact for verio radb

I need to give somebody contact for verio routing database to have several of the database entries removed from there (they have beenadded without consent of ip block administrator and he does not want them there).Who would the be correct person to contact at verio? -- William Leibzon Elan N

Re: This may be stupid but..

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Peter Galbavy wrote: > Also an excellent way of checking if your candidate cares about past > employers confidentiality. That is if you want to see someone bad-mouth a > previous company. oh no, i like some gossip.. wheres the fun of an ex- employee not telling you about al

Re: This may be stupid but..

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's the same reason that I like to ask candidates to tell a story > about some past event and how they, personally, dealt with it. If a > candidate has had real personal experience of something then they will > be able to tell me a story filled with detail. On the other

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

In a message written on Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:38:23AM -0800, Crist Clark wrote: > You _used_ to be able to do this (oh, over two years ago?). The address > was assigned to the interface, and the error from trying to add a duplicate > route was simply ignored, no route got added anywhere. You can

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

> You _used_ to be able to do this (oh, over two years ago?). The address > was assigned to the interface, and the error from trying to add a duplicate > route was simply ignored, no route got added anywhere. You can figure out > when the change was made by examining the code or by seeing when the

Re: This may be stupid but.

Well, FORK YOU AND THE PACKET YOU WERE ENCAPSULATED IN! This is just priceless ... I am going to send the guy a note and find out where he is working these days :-) Doug Luce wrote: This person obviously didn't understand the security implications associated with handing out your publi

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

Leo Bicknell wrote: > > In a message written on Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +, Sugar, Sylvia wrote: > > I am curious to know if its possible to have a router with its two interfaces, say > > configured as, > > 1.1.1.1/16 and 1.1.1.2/16. Theoretically, i see nothing which can stop a route

US LEC?

Does anyone have any experience in dealing with US Lec? I'm working with a FastNet customer who's been sold to them in FSST's bankruptcy. We have other connectivity in the meantime. Thx, -Dave

Re: This may be stupid but.

This person obviously didn't understand the security implications associated with handing out your public SSH key. Also, to those that have been asking: the semi-automated test environment was dismantled about the same time we filled the position, so we don't have it available to go through. Dou

Re: This may be stupid but..

Doug, Don't tease - you absolutely owe us the full text of the response from the fellow who was upset about your asking for a public SSH key as part of the interview process. Neal Doug Luce wrote: I rely on recruiters to funnel applicants to the company. I also u

Re: Nachi claims another college: Dartmouth November 7

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Sean Donelan wrote: : Almost half of all student computers on Dartmouth's campus have been : infected by the Nachi/Welchia worm. If student's do not fix their : Has anyone figured out a way to get computer users to fix their computers : other than fixing the computer for t

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

In a message written on Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:34:31AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > I'm not sure how Cisco is wrong on this one. If you want 2 router > interfaces to have the same route and you actually want both of them to > work, it means at the very least you must have a non point-to-

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:55:34AM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +, Sugar, Sylvia wrote: > > I am curious to know if its possible to have a router with its two interfaces, say > > configured as, > > 1.1.1.1/16 and 1.1.1.2/16. Theoretical

RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

>> I am curious to know if its possible to have a router with its >> two interfaces, say configured as, 1.1.1.1/16 and 1.1.1.2/16. >> Theoretically, i see nothing which can stop a router from doing this. > Cisco's don't let you do this. I have always considered that > broken, although I'm sure

RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

Well you can do it if you are bridging... Michelle Truman CCIE # 8098 Principal Technical Consultant AT&T Solutions Center 651-998-0949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

In a message written on Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +, Sugar, Sylvia wrote: > I am curious to know if its possible to have a router with its two interfaces, say > configured as, > 1.1.1.1/16 and 1.1.1.2/16. Theoretically, i see nothing which can stop a router from > doing this. Cisco's

RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

If you bridge, you are actually not doing routing =) You can configure a channel group with FE, but anyway it would be concider by the router as if you have only 1 interface. Regards. -Mensaje original- De: Frank Louwers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 11 de Noviembre de 2

RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

--On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:19 AM -0300 Lucas Iglesias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As I know, according to the routing theory, it has no sense to have 2 interfaces on the same net. At least, on Cisco routers is not allowed. It would make much more sense to have two routers connected to the s

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:19:21AM -0300, Lucas Iglesias wrote: > > As I know, according to the routing theory, it has no sense to have 2 > interfaces on the same net. what if you bridge on one interface, but want to have a second "backup" interface in case your config/router fscks up with the b

RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

As I know, according to the routing theory, it has no sense to have 2 interfaces on the same net. At least, on Cisco routers is not allowed. kind regards. -Mensaje original- De: Sugar, Sylvia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 11 de Noviembre de 2003 05:36 a.m. Para: [EMAIL

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

Or possibly bridging? P. On Tuesday 11 November 2003 1:41 pm, Shawn Solomon wrote: > I would guess that they actually want 1 of the following: > > Redundancy of some sort. > Increased bandwidth to the router. > > > > -- > Shawn Solomon > Senior Network Engineer / Systems Design > IHETS / ITN > 3

RE: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

I would guess that they actually want 1 of the following: Redundancy of some sort. Increased bandwidth to the router. -- Shawn Solomon Senior Network Engineer / Systems Design IHETS / ITN 317.263.8875 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fx317.263.8831 -Original Message- From: Sugar, Sylvia [mailto

Re: Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

On 11 Nov 2003 08:35 UTC Sylvia Sugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a customer who insists he wants to do this, without providing > any explanations! In my experience if a customer says they want to do something but will not provide explanations, then either they have been told by someone

Re: This may be stupid but..

>> When I interview, I start out by asking one or two key questions that >> help me quickly get to the truth. For instance at one company, when I >> has hiring NOC folks, I started by asking them to explain traceroute >> to me. >"Which one? ICMP, UDP or TCP traceroute (to name the usual ones)?"

Router with 2 (or more) interfaces in same network

Hi, I am curious to know if its possible to have a router with its two interfaces, say configured as, 1.1.1.1/16 and 1.1.1.2/16. Theoretically, i see nothing which can stop a router from doing this. But practically, is it of any use? And if used, then, when and why will somebody want to use s

Re: law enforcement contacts

At 02:13 AM 11/11/2003, J. Oquendo wrote: Uhm... Correct me if I missed something, but LEO's get paid to uphold the law BY ACTING on crime in their expertise and if it's out of their range (juridstiction) an `LEO` should have better contacts than someone on the outside. Perhaps they will have conta

Re: law enforcement contacts

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:36:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:55:40 PST, JC Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I have several clueful LEO contacts, but this information will be of no use > > to you unless the crime was committed within their respective > > jurisdi