Having dealt with them for some time, the public interfaces to the Bell
object have not really changed one way or another. This is from my
perspective as a consumer of Bell wholesale services... The same main help
desks are there-- AOC, INOC, DSSC. Despite the host name being bell nexxia
it i
the mirror may be gone because, according to Francois menard, bell
nexxia was disbanded by bell canada in april or may 2003 and absorbed
back into bell canada's operations
I asked through regular channels, but no one knew the answer. You
used to have a looking glass at
http://looking-glas
I asked through regular channels, but no one knew the answer. You used to
have a looking glass at http://looking-glass.in.bellnexxia.net:8080/ but
its been offline for a while. Did it move ? Is it gone for good ?
---Mike
-
R> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:05:55 -0800
R> From: Roy
(CC list trimmed)
R> Media converters are much cheaper than specialized FX cards
R> like these. A 10Mbps converters are just $99 each and 100Mbps
R> is $150.
Definitely more attractive than the work needed to prevent ground
loops when usin
At 05:18 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Ejay Hire wrote:
> Lucent Pipeline 130, Superpipe 95, or Superpipe 155.
Well 2 minutes on Froogle tell me your definition of cheap and mine don't
match. For the same price range I would get a netopia R4522 or 5300 which
will reliably do NAT
Hello,
Given that our L3 rep is useless for this information, perhaps another
customer of L3 @ 1118th (3rd floor) can help me out.
We are ordering our first cross-connect to the meet-me room since I've
arrived, and I'm wondering how to specify the location to the vendors.
We're dropping a POTS l
Technically speaking, the port is definitely not a HSSI port.
HSSI is ~ 52mbps and used for DS-3 and E3. You're probably looking for
a v.35 interface, EIA-422/485, or similar interface to match your CSU.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, De
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Gerald wrote:
> With a little more research, I think I can better clarify that I'm looking
> for just about any router (<$50-100) that has a HSSI port and an RJ45
You ever hit send and then wish you could chase after that E-mail with a
s/HSSI/v.35/ ?
I was wrongly using the
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Ejay Hire wrote:
> Lucent Pipeline 130, Superpipe 95, or Superpipe 155.
Well 2 minutes on Froogle tell me your definition of cheap and mine don't
match. For the same price range I would get a netopia R4522 or 5300 which
will reliably do NAT and all.
With a little more resea
Lucent Pipeline 130, Superpipe 95, or Superpipe 155.
Cheap, Reasonably reliable, no external CSU-DSU required.
Personally, I won't run Nat on them. It's been my
experience that 9 out of 10 will work fine with Nat, but 1
will have odd problems and require reboots.
-Ejay
> -Original Message-
I'm experimenting at home with hardware. I'm playing with low end T1
equipment at the moment. What is a low-cost router solution to hook to a
CSU/DSU? (where I don't have to pay a ridiculous $800+ IOS relicensing
fee preferably.)
With Cisco 2500's going on Ebay for $10-$30, I'd like to find somet
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > PA-2FE-FX$5000/card$25.00/Mbit
>
> $2,000 on ebay
And for the 7500s, you can get POSIP full cards for $250-$1000 depending
on fiber type, also from ebay.
--
Jon Lewis [EM
On 19 Dec 2003, at 13:42, Bruce Robertson wrote:
Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay? No one send you a box of
rocks?
I've had 100% success buying on eBay. The Cisco TAC issue has never
come up;
they NEVER ask me where I got something.
Maybe they will, now :-)
> Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay?
yep. use rating system
> No one send you a box of rocks?
nope
> What about Cisco SPAR for TAC support?
new cisco parts
randy
Interestingly enough, sometimes it's cheaper to buy a small unmanaged switch
with a fiber uplink port than to buy a
media converter...
> -Original Message-
> Media converters are much cheaper than specialized FX cards
> like these. A
> 10Mbps converters are just $99 each and 100
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Roy wrote:
>
> Media converters are much cheaper than specialized FX cards like these. A
> 10Mbps converters are just $99 each and 100Mbps is $150.
Yes, but you need external power for these and they aren't
monitorable/configurable from any interface. Thus if one goes down
Media converters are much cheaper than specialized FX cards like these. A
10Mbps converters are just $99 each and 100Mbps is $150.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stephen Sprunk
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Claydon, Tom
Cc:
> Fisher, Shawn
> Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay?
> No one send you a box of rocks?
That's the question the UPS driver once asked when delivering a 7507;
the box did contain a router though and no rocks.
> What about Cisco SPAR for TAC support?
For some, it has come to a point where
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Fisher, Shawn wrote:
> Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay? No one send you a box of rocks?
buying, selling you name it. Hardware on Ebay is usually less than
anywhere else. WRT failures you can normally afford 2 or more from Ebay
for the price difference of (buying e
> Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay? No one send you a box of rocks?
I've had 100% success buying on eBay. The Cisco TAC issue has never come up;
they NEVER ask me where I got something. Of course, the only hardware that has
ever failed on us has been exactly one Catalyst 2924 switch,
Curiouos, you have success buying on Ebay? No one send you a box of rocks?
What about Cisco SPAR for TAC support?
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:24 PM
To: Stephen Sprunk
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes
Subje
Title: Message
Is anyone seeing
increased activity on UDP/1434? We are seeing boxes which have been
patched for SQL slammer spewing lots of traffic to randomized destination
addresses for about 2 hours. Intense googling has revealed nothing new
since SQL slammer. Any information would be
> PA-2FE-FX$5000/card$25.00/Mbit
$2,000 on ebay
randy
Thus spake "Claydon, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yep. There's plenty of fiber between the two buildings, so we may go that
> route. Anyone know if there's any easy way to limit bandwidth on the
> PA-POS-OC3 adapters?
PA-POS-OC3MM$6000/card$38.71/Mbit
PA-FE-FX$3200/card$32.00/Mbit
P
Hello,
Can anyone confirm claims from Cogent that there is an MFN fiber
issue between PHL and DCA that creates 10-15% packet loss? Simple test are
pointing at the Cogtent not having enough capacity between PHL and DCA.
According to Cogent that issue had been happening for several days now
> The quite annoying thing about that is switching a PC-MC-2T3+ interface
> from channelized (the default) to unchannelized causes a cbus complex
> restart, which interrupts traffic through the router for a period of
> time (the time varies based on the number of interfaces in the router).
Even w
Yep. There's plenty of fiber between the two buildings, so we may go that
route. Anyone know if there's any easy way to limit bandwidth on the
PA-POS-OC3 adapters?
Sounds like another job for rate limiting to me...
= TC
-Original Message-
From: David Lesher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
Title: Message
Wireless is fine too. I use Airaya (http://www.airaya.com). You can get a
pair of radios capable of 35mbps for $999. I have them working over 6
miles
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:49
AMTo:
Once upon a time, Jared Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The PA-MC-2T3+ will do both channelized and unchannelized
> DS3 with the same PA.
>
> This makes it easier on some of us who need both and for
> doing sparing of hardware. It's worthwhile to spend the extra cash
> if you think
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:45:08AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:35:34AM -0500, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
> > > Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in
> > > a PA-MC-2T3+
Incase you didn't notice, the original poster works
for a Telephone Company.
Such things as short distance x-connects, DS3, and other
services will make the most sense as they likely have the necessary
hardware and equipment to test and repair these types of cabling
whereas, wirel
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
>
>
> Roy wrote:
>
> > Why waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close. Don't
> > overlook the benefit of using the old thin-net for 200m.
>
> I'd be cautious about metal between buildings, but Ethernet on
> fiber might
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:36:08AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Yes, it's a point-to-point link.
Somebody else mentioned ethernet; I know (without specific
recommendation though) that you can run fiber and use some inexpensive
media converters on each end to produce something tha
Title: Message
Or
wireless.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
RoySent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:30 AMTo:
Claydon, Tom; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Bandwidth Control
Question
Why
waste a T3 port. Run ethernet i
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:35:34AM -0500, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in
> > a PA-MC-2T3+ card for the 7206...I have at least four PA-MC-T3 cards, and
> > they're
Roy wrote:
> Why waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close. Don't
> overlook the benefit of using the old thin-net for 200m.
I'd be cautious about metal between buildings, but Ethernet on
fiber might make sense.
Hi Mark,
Yes, it's a point-to-point link.
= TC
-Original Message-
From: Mark E. Mallett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:36 AM
To: Claydon, Tom
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Control Question
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Claydo
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Claydon, Tom wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in
> a PA-MC-2T3+ card for the 7206...I have at least four PA-MC-T3 cards, and
> they're not going to work the way I want them to (unless I rate-limit them).
Th
Title: Bandwidth Control Question
Why
waste a T3 port. Run ethernet if they are that close. Don't overlook
the benefit of using the old thin-net for 200m.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Claydon,
TomSent: Friday, December 19, 2003
Title: RE: Bandwidth Control Question
Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like I'm going to have to invest in a PA-MC-2T3+ card for the 7206...I have at least four PA-MC-T3 cards, and they're not going to work the way I want them to (unless I rate-limit them).
Thanks,
= TC
--
Tom Clay
Thanks. I not very familiar with the integrated DSU T3/E3 command set - still used to
the good ol HSSI ports. I'll agree, this sounds like a better solution if you are
using one of the integrated cards.
Yes - you are correct, in my solution both sides should always use a traffic-shape or
oth
> Bryan Heitman
> Why not simply use configuration option Cisco gives
> you to set your DS3 to 6 meg dsu bandwidth X
That's what I do, works fine.
> Dan, your suggestion will unncessarily tax his equipment.
Not only that, but the rate-limiting on the input interface will likely force the
cust
Title: Bandwidth Control Question
Why not simply use configuration option Cisco gives
you to set your DS3 to 6 meg
dsu bandwidth X
Dan, your suggestion will unncessarily tax his
equipment.
Bryan
- Original Message -
From:
Dan Ellis
To: Claydon, Tom ; [EMAIL PROTECT
Tom,
If you are using Cisco's on both ends, you can easily do:
interface SerialX/0
bandwidth 6144
ip address 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip proxy-arp
load-interval 30
dsu bandwidth 6144
no dsu remote accept
scramble
cablelength 450
no cdp enab
Title: Bandwidth Control Question
Tom,
My suggestion is to enable the full DS3
and have each router traffic-shape to 6M on the neighboring interfaces.
Rate-limit on the input of your router to disallow the customer from sending
you more than the limit. Remember that for the most part ra
Title: Bandwidth Control Question
Hello,
A customer of ours in the next building would like 6M of Internet bandwidth from us, so we would wire a DS3 between the two buildings for connectivity.
The question is: how to we control the amount of bandwidth that we give them? Could we use rate li
This report has been generated at Fri Dec 19 21:47:30 2003 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
47 matches
Mail list logo
