Ok, I realized I haven't done one of these since 2001, so it's time for an
updated list of /24 polluters. With /24s accounting for over 50% (more
than 71k) of the announcements on the Internet, it seems reasonable to try
and take a look at why there are so many.
One of the patterns which quickly
Why particular interest in 146.20.40.0/21 now? Its been announced for very
long and is only one of the blocks annouunced from 146.20.0.0/16, is there
something you have seen from this particular block, like scans or attacks?
As to 146.20.0.0/16 I can tell that this ip block has been noted as in
Could someone from FiberNet contact me offlist?
TIA
Dick Cocks [10/01/04 14:51 +0800]:
I wonder why this guy has so less sense as to keep creating accounts on a
service that has an AUP against forgery.
Now, which nanog poster do we know who
* Lives in NYC (the last two morphs he used to post to nanog were from new
york based dsl lines -
At 11:16 AM 09-01-04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send it in to AVERT. It's free analysis and will give you
recommendations for how to deal with it:
https://www.webimmune.net/default.asp
...does require registration but again, it's free.
or email it in per instructions here:
http://vil.nai.c
Could someone from Rogers Internet contact me offlist?
Thanks,
hello,
On November 15th 2003, IANA allocated 83/8 and 84/8 to RIPE.
RIPE has started allocating prefixes from these blocks to LIRs around
Europe. We received 83.116.0.0/14 and have started connecting domestic
users with these IP addresses.
Unfortunately, quite a few ISPs and corporates out ther
> Frans ter Borg wrote:
> On November 15th 2003, IANA allocated 83/8 and
> 84/8 to RIPE. Unfortunately, quite a few ISPs
> and corporates out there, have not yet updated
> their bogon filters to allow for these ranges
> to pass.
The inconvenience of this would be greatly lessened if more people u
Hi, NANOGers.
] Unfortunately, quite a few ISPs and corporates out there, have not yet
] updated their bogon filters to allow for these ranges to pass. These are
] including sites like cnn.com, yahoo.com and excite.com.
Spread the word! These filters are _easy_ to update. Heck, in one
case you
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Rob Thomas wrote:
> If folks require assistance with the modification and testing of
> filters, please don't hesitate to ping on us!
Don't forget about the other half of the problem. ISPs need to
verify the network announcements by their downstream BGP networks.
Eventually m
10 matches
Mail list logo
