On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:01:48AM +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote:
That would depend what is causing the CPU usage. If it is software based
IP header lookups, you're not going to get any more peformance out of it
by trying to do more lookups than your CPU can handle.
Surprisingly,
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this publically in some
forums and IXP ops lists. Response is poor, action is non-existent.
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for upstreams to educate
their customers and others to pressure their peers.
Two primary reasons
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this
publically in some forums and IXP ops lists. Response is
poor, action is non-existent.
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for
upstreams to educate their customers and others to pressure
their peers.
Two
On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
and that a large driver is to
make your network look larger than it is...
What audience??
Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require things like
Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes. :(
--
TTFN,
patrick
Following documents are recommended reading:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/006489/h323.htm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040113-h323.shtml
--Kauto
Kauto Huopio - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Security Adviser / CERT-FI -coordinator
Finnish Communications Regulatory
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this publically in
some forums and IXP ops lists. Response is poor, action is non-existent.
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for upstreams to
educate their customers and others to pressure their peers.
or just filter
If there are any sales-types that can offer Ethernet connectivity at the
LayerOne facility on Bryan St in Dallas, please contact me off-list.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:17:47AM -0600, Beprojects.com wrote:
If there are any sales-types that can offer Ethernet connectivity at the
LayerOne facility on Bryan St in Dallas, please contact me off-list.
Thanks.
Attention NANOG,
Sales type inquiries belong on isp-bandwidth. For more
On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:58 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this publically in
some forums and IXP ops lists. Response is poor, action is
non-existent.
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for upstreams to
educate their customers and others
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for upstreams to educate
their customers and others to pressure their peers.
Educating customers... educating peers... I think enough had been tried and that is
just too much work for the most people with little effect.
The problem is the
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:26:59PM -0500, Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:58 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this publically in
some forums and IXP ops lists. Response is poor, action is
non-existent.
The only way I can see to
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this publically in some
forums and IXP ops lists. Response is poor, action is non-existent.
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for upstreams to educate
their customers and others to pressure their
Ok, I am often outgunned and off target here.
But I have to ask this:
1. If filtering is used, as suggested by someone, what happens to the
small/mid-sized company that is multi-homed out of an ISP's
/20 or larger block? In this case, I can see an ISP with a /20
bust
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:12:13PM -0500, Craig Partridge wrote:
The basic issue here is the huge difference between a nice, dense, slow
and relatively cool [cheap!] DRAM and very fast, not so dense, and pretty hot
[and very expensive] SRAM. That Dell server has DRAM. Your route processor
I'm amazed no one mentioned Etheral works just fine under Windows (well,
at least it runs as well as any OTHER Windows software seems to, let's put
it like that). I guess those of use lucky enough to use Linux/Unix/*BSD
etc forget there are other, less fortunates out there :)
You can install
According to this paper http://luca.ntop.org/Ring.pdf, you may be the lucky
one, instead of unfortunate users of out-of-the-box *nix libpcap
implementations. The good thing with open-source is the room to improve, as
the solution presented on the paper shows.
Rubens
- Original Message
On Jan 13, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Steve Francis wrote:
I'll take some education - given two POP's, different upstream ISPs at
each POP, and a desire to have traffic for specific networks (/24)
enter a specific POP, can that be done without de-aggregation?
We are not doing this ourselves - we're not
On Jan 13, 2004, at 2:35 PM, McBurnett, Jim wrote:
Ok, I am often outgunned and off target here.
But I have to ask this:
1. If filtering is used, as suggested by someone, what happens to the
small/mid-sized company that is multi-homed out of an ISP's
/20 or larger block? In this
Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 13, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Steve Francis wrote:
I'll take some education - given two POP's, different upstream ISPs
at each POP, and a desire to have traffic for specific networks (/24)
enter a specific POP, can that be done without de-aggregation?
We are not doing
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michael Hallgren wrote:
On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require
things like Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes. :(
Wonderful...
mh
Easy to fix by changing to covering N million
On Jan 13, 2004, at 3:58 PM, Steve Francis wrote:
Patrick W.Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 13, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Steve Francis wrote:
I'll take some education - given two POP's, different upstream ISPs
at each POP, and a desire to have traffic for specific networks
(/24) enter a specific POP, can that
On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Vadim Antonov wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michael Hallgren wrote:
On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require
things like Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes. :(
Wonderful...
mh
Easy to fix by
I am hearing reports of a power failure in downtown los angeles,
particularly the One Wilshire building. One uncorroborated report says
that the entire building just switched to generator power several
minutes ago. Does anyone in 818 have more information?
And then there are the upstreams that filter legacy /24's
Seen that too...
- Original Message -
From: Patrick W.Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Patrick Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 15:13
Subject: Re: /24s run amuck
On Jan 13, 2004,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:12:13PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Answer: You don't. This is the type of deaggregation which is a
necessary evil. And, IMHO, why filtering on /20 (or whatever) is a
Bad Thing. You have just as much right to multiple upstreams as the
Filtering on a /20
On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:14 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
I am hearing reports of a power failure in downtown los angeles,
particularly the One Wilshire building. One uncorroborated report
says that the entire building just switched to generator power several
minutes ago. Does anyone in 818 have
Yes they did lose power.
I have a presence there and I saw the hit on some of my equipment.
Not directly on my equipment but 2 of my POS circuits went down.
No word yet if they are still on Generator or not.
Regards,
--
Joel Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Eric Kuhnke said:
I am hearing reports of a power failure in downtown los angeles,
particularly the One Wilshire building. One uncorroborated report says
that the entire building just switched to generator power several
minutes ago. Does anyone in 818 have more information?
Confirmed. One
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:29:43PM -0500, Matt Levine wrote:
I am hearing reports of a power failure in downtown los angeles,
particularly the One Wilshire building. One uncorroborated report
says that the entire building just switched to generator power several
minutes ago. Does anyone
Joel Perez said:
Yes they did lose power.
I have a presence there and I saw the hit on some of my equipment.
Not directly on my equipment but 2 of my POS circuits went down.
No word yet if they are still on Generator or not.
All GBLX circuits served by their MMR switch have been down since
Deaggregation is at an all time high, I have raised this publically in some
forums and IXP ops lists. Response is poor, action is non-existent.
The only way I can see to do anything about this is for upstreams to educate
their customers and others to pressure their peers.
I'll take
1 W is down and so is most of downtown LA.
We have a presence in 1 W and 530 West 6th Street are currently running
on Generator power. This appears to be a large outage effecting most of
downtown LA.
arman
Joel Perez wrote:
Yes they did lose power.
I have a presence there and I saw the hit on
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Grant A. Kirkwood wrote:
Confirmed. One Wilshire, 818 W. 7th, 600 W. 7th, 600 Wilshire, etc.. are
all on generator at this time. We can see smoke from generators in many
directions, not sure how widespread it is yet.
Hmph, I was trying to figure out where this was ;-)
Title: RE: One Wilshire building / Downtown LA power failure?
any word on 1200 west 7th Street?
Colin Brown
Sr. Network Engineer
ITXC Corp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Arman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 4:50 PM
To: Joel Perez
Cc: [EMAIL
1. If filtering is used, as suggested by someone, what happens to the
small/mid-sized company that is multi-homed out of an ISP's
/20 or larger block? In this case, I can see an ISP with a /20
bust that up to /21s smaller to accommodate this user.
2. Wasn't /24 filtering
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 05:07:04PM -0500, Colin Brown wrote:
any word on 1200 west 7th Street?
I haven't noticed anything. Also spoke to someone over there and they
mentioned the lights flickering for a second - however they are
apparently not on generator power.
--
Since when is skepticism
hi,
I am seing root shell attempts and SNMP (Approx 1200 in an hour)
sweeps coming from what appears to be a netops system at Sprint.
If someone from there is online, Please drop me a line offlist...
Thanks,
Jim
37 matches
Mail list logo
