Thus spake "Mailing List Subscriptions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use your real name when posting to nanog (per the AUP).
> Two private line T1's between A and B - one terrestial T1 with >200
> ms RTT, the other T1 is over satellite with ~500 ms RTT. The circuits
> are being used for mixed VoIP
None of the satellite circuit I have worked on during the last five years
has been more than 550 ms RTT. They are all C-band VSAT type systems in
North America and Latin America. The economy (both $$ and quality) of
satellite is such that it is only considered ...
1) No reasonably priced or reli
yes. there are a lot of pix firewalls out there with smtp fixup turned on,
effectively disabling ESMTP (not to mention sporadically breaking
traditional SMTP.)
Could you elaborate on this? I use PIX firewalls all over the place and
don't seem to have a problem with SMTP or ESMTP.
Rob Nelson
[
[3/28/2004 7:29 PM] Rob Nelson :
Could you elaborate on this? I use PIX firewalls all over the place and
don't seem to have a problem with SMTP or ESMTP.
Check whether "smtp fixup" is enabled - and if it is, disable it using
# no fixup protocol smtp 25
Test the results (from an outside host, u
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 08:59:40 -0500 Rob Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >yes. there are a lot of pix firewalls out there with smtp fixup turned on,
> >effectively disabling ESMTP (not to mention sporadically breaking
> >traditional SMTP.)
> Could you elaborate on this? I use PIX firewalls all
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:22:44 -0500 (EST) Richard Welty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i should add that i think that this proposal is a bad idea for any
number of reasons, but this cisco pix thing is very concrete
so i just wanted to get it out there.
before i write an extended explanation of why i
On 3/28/2004 9:57 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
> before i write an extended explanation of why i don't like this
> idea much, i'd very much like to hear some of the motivation
> behind the proposal.
It wasn't a proposal, it was a request for data. My own local data
suggests that HELO is almost excl
On 3/28/2004 10:19 AM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> might be feasible for some of us to disable legacy SMTP entirely.
To be more realistic (and to close-in on any 'proposal' which might
subsequently develop), it would likely be far more feasible to assign
somewhat agressive negative weighting to sessi
On Mar 28, 2004, at 10:44 AM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
To be more realistic (and to close-in on any 'proposal' which might
subsequently develop), it would likely be far more feasible to assign
somewhat agressive negative weighting to sessions that use HELO (and
further possible to assign mild positive
> VoIP over satellite? I am very sceptical about it. Better, forget such
> idea.
It works just fine. In fact, quite a lot of international calls to smaller
countries are routed exactly that way.
Alex
QoS mechanisms (i.e. CBWFQ/LLQ) take care of prioritizing voice over data.
So I am not worried about data. Dynamic routing (EIGRP in this case) does a
beautiful job of failing over IP traffic from one T1 to another when
required.
The objective of this exercise is to see how we can go about overf
I have been tasked by management to determine if there is a way to connect
more than 1 AS5814 to a Cisco7206VXR for the purpose of Providing Dialup
Modems. Currently we have a 1 to 1 ratio of Cisco 7206VXR Router-Shelf
connected to a Cisco 5814 Dial-Shelf and it works without any problems. We
are
Anyone else notice that you now need javascript in order to even
view TAC Cases? Anyone else annoyed by this crippling of
something Cisco actually did reasonably well?
Anyone not care what cisco does to CCO because you're still mourning
the loss of CIO?
What's next, requirement for flash to view
Hello,
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm the only one left who sees a need to be able to
> check on things from a vt100 at a remote site.
You are not alone.
Would be nice if there was a "view as text" option.
Michael...
having a major provider like Cisco require that field
technical people have significant computing resources to
view potentialy critical information is very very bad.
Many times in the field you are working in a situation where
you don't have many of the normal resources a desk jockey
would have.
>
> At this time, it looks like using H.323 gatekeeper as suggested by Patrick
> Murphy maybe the most likely way to go.
Yes, use gatekeeper to balance calls between terrestrial link (for first NN
calls) and satellite link (for other calls).
Be sure that reverse traffic uses the same path (it can
16 matches
Mail list logo
