-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yoi All!
My apologies to the list for beating a dead horse. This was sent around
noon today, but Merit had issues with my reverse DNS until later in the
day
RGDS
GARY
-
As far as your own incoming mail is concerned,
you get the same results by either requiring almost every ISP in the world
to block outgoing SMTP from almost all of their users,
or by using a blocking list that blocks the same users.
The blocking list approach preserves the end-to-end behavior of
On 15-apr-04, at 2:45, Paul Vixie wrote:
preventing DDoS and IP source address forgery each also break what the
IAB calls the end-to-end model.
How so?
(dunno if you heard, but in spite of 128 bits of
address space, the enterprise user community is now asking for IPv6
NAT.)
I hadn't, pointer
In case you didn't know, SORBS admins do populate this list from time to
time, so I might be worth going through a few things...
Jeremy Kister wrote:
I became aware that just about all of 64.115.0.0/16, a network that I (among
others) run, has been listed as dynamic ip space in sorbs as of
Jeff Kell wrote:
Jeremy Kister wrote:
[... giant snip ...]
We are a former user of SORBS. Our issue was not that of dynamic IPs,
but rather their spamtrap listings. A few weeks ago, at least two of
Comcast's legitimate mail servers was blacklisted. As Comcast has a
majority of the cable
Matthew Sullivan wrote:
snip
You will note my post before Christmas about the up and coming
whitelisting mechanism - I am still collecting details for people
wanting to use it - unfortunately for a variety of reasons the
whitelisting mechanism is still not ready to go public.
Yours
Matthew
Jeremy Kister wrote:
I became aware that just about all of 64.115.0.0/16
In this same email, I also stated:
1. exactly which 64.115 networks were dynamic
Ok now I have settled into another night of fixing things... I see no
mails from yourself in the ticketting system which indicate dynamic
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Joe Maimon wrote:
Speaking about whitelistingcomp.mail.sendmail google
link...Reproduced below..
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=sendmail+whitelist+dnshl=enlr=ie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8c2coff=1selm=ac4e9990.0311250514.65c4e614%40posting.google.comrnum=9
ok...you've now
--On Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:10 AM -0500 Stewart, William C (Bill),
RTSLS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or by using a blocking list that blocks the same users.
Unless you're using an ATT nameserver it seems...
JA Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:07:30 -0400
JA From: Joe Abley
JA There's a slight wrinkle with that for people who want to
JA submit mail over SSL.
JA
JA Several graphical, consumer-grade mail clients let you select
JA a port for outgoing mail (SMTP) and also have a checkbox
JA for use a secure
JD Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:16:46 -0700
JD From: JC Dill
JD We need to stop whining that it's hard or expensive do to
JD the right thing and close loopholes that are abused by
JD spammers. It's much harder Aand more expensive long term to
JD NOT do the right thing.
Leave it for future
John Curran wrote:
incidents from almost every router vendor on the planet (and simply
don't buy from the ones that fail to correct the problem).
Yep, that's the important one to me. Most of the time I don't really care
when a brand makes a stupid mistake, what I judge the company on is then
Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Scott Call wrote:
My point was that my $20 GE telephone cannot be made into a liability for
my telephone provider without my explicit participation, whereas a $20 a
month dialup (or $50 a month DSL, etc) customer can be a liability for me
just by being
The power at the Bellagio failed for about three days. The failure
involved about 1,000 feet of internal primary power cable. Although
the Bellagio had emergency and backup power, because it was an internal
cable, the backup generators couldn't supply power either. The Las Vegas
Sun has one of
Jeremy Kister wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I highly appreciate your time in replying to my emails. I further
appreciate you removing 64.115.0.0/16 from the sorbs duhl.
One of my partners in crime sent the first email (via web-form) to sorbs on
April 6th. On april 10th, I repeated. both were addressed from
15 matches
Mail list logo
