Hello Folk,
I was
wondering if in-fact any of our routes are being suppressed either via our ASN
30174 or any of our ip space 66.164.0.0/16 or 66.79.96.0/20.Givenand
Granted that we have hadrotten history of sorts. However, we really have
cleaned up our networks and rid ourselves of all
Quoting Steven Champeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It's not really my business why a hotmail.com MX accepted mail it
couldn't deliver. I could care less /why/. It's up to hotmail to fix
their systems - I don't care how they perform that background check on
quota.
Exactly.
It's my business
If anyone at Goddard Space Flight Center (gsfc.nava.gov) is on the
list, can you please contact me off-list about an e-mail blocking
issue?
--
Jason McCormick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 66C5 2B15 3E34 2B5E 5321 6147 303A DCE6 0A74 A19C
Todd Vierling wrote:
A colleague asked me offlist about how to make a Sendmail secondary MX
properly return 550 for invalid recipient addresses.
[snip]
For those with an LDAP directory containing mailbox information, I'd
recommend using sendmail's built-in LDAP capabilities. I've found it
a good
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:49, Eric A. Hall wrote:
There's one rule that will wipe out ~90% of spam, but nobody seems to have
written it yet.
if URL IP addr is in China then score=100
I beg to differ Eric A. Hall.
According to statistics gathered by the Spamhaus Project
on Wed, May 19, 2004 at 03:12:29PM -0700, James Couzens wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:49, Eric A. Hall wrote:
There's one rule that will wipe out ~90% of spam, but nobody seems to have
written it yet.
if URL IP addr is in China then score=100
^^^
I
On Wed, 19 May 2004, James Couzens wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:49, Eric A. Hall wrote:
There's one rule that will wipe out ~90% of spam, but nobody seems to have
written it yet.
if URL IP addr is in China then score=100
I beg to differ Eric A. Hall.
No Eric is quite correct. Read
On 5/19/2004 5:12 PM, James Couzens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 21:49, Eric A. Hall wrote:
There's one rule that will wipe out ~90% of spam, but nobody seems to
have written it yet.
if URL IP addr is in China then score=100
^^^
not connection address, not
On 19 May 2004 15:12:29 -0700 James Couzens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| if URL IP addr is in China then score=100
| I beg to differ Eric A. Hall.
...
|
| So contrary to what you said, perhaps I should just Null Route all
| email originating from the USA? ;)
While this is verging off our remit
If you plan to attend Sunday's hands-on tutorial for using the IPsec
server at NANOG, you may want to have a look at the slides in
advance. You can find them at: http://www.packet-pushers.net/NANOG/ipsec/
Unix users, in particular, may need to prepare their systems by
building a new kernel
Does anyone know of a list of dynamic IP's by ISP?
I'm looking for something akin to this list from AOL
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/info/servers.html
TIA
Bob Martin
Does anyone know of a list of dynamic IP's by ISP?
By ISP, no, but this may be of interest,
http://www.mail-abuse.org/dul/
Thanks,
Adam
Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg Appleton: 920-738-9032
System Administrator Valley Fair:
Now if I read that page, it's no longer available for public access, if
you purchase it, it may be of some use for you.. other than that, I do not
know.
*-1 for jumping an idea without researching*
Thanks,
Adam
Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 15:28, Eric A. Hall wrote:
not connection address, not domain 'owner', but URL-Hostname-IP_ADDR
What's most interesting about the half-dozen accusations of xenophobia
I've received (off-list and on) is that they've almost all come from
foreigners. I promise not to read
On 5/19/2004 6:19 PM, James Couzens wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 15:28, Eric A. Hall wrote:
Going through the spam that I've got access to (and it is a substantial
amount allbeit not in the millions of spam per day) I can't seem to
associate the spam with chinese urls, and certainly not to
Not Ip's but domain names etc I block. You can perhaps generate some from
this?
http://www.unixgirl.com/blockeddomains.html
Nicole
On 19-May-04 the GW commando coersion squad reported Bob Martin said :
Does anyone know of a list of dynamic IP's by ISP?
I'm looking for something
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Richard Cox wrote:
While this is verging off our remit here, I would clarify the point
originally made, which is that if a URL - that is, a URL cited in the
body of a message - points to an IP physically located in China, then
that signals a high probability of the
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Richard Cox wrote:
While this is verging off our remit here, I would clarify the point
originally made, which is that if a URL - that is, a URL cited in the
body of a message - points to an IP physically located in China,
perhaps this all belongs on alt.jingo.weenies? can we focus on
network operations not network exclusionism? this is worse than
spam.
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 16:24, Eric A. Hall wrote:
extract hostname from url, dig on hostname, whois on addr, and nine times
out of ten the host is in a CN netblock. that's from the spam that gets
into my mailbox.
Yes I understand that is what you meant. I just did this on 5 spam in
my mail
On 5/19/2004 6:38 PM, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Altho this is probably not true if you're one of the billion or so
people who live in or around China or are of Chinese origin..
just check for charset=US-ASCII first. come to think of it, ASCII would
probably give half the necessary weight
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Couzens wrote:
| On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 16:24, Eric A. Hall wrote:
|
|extract hostname from url, dig on hostname, whois on addr, and nine times
|out of ten the host is in a CN netblock. that's from the spam that gets
|into my mailbox.
|
|
| Yes I
Title: RE: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall
Eric,
There's one rule that will wipe out ~90% of spam, but nobody seems to have
written it yet.
if URL IP addr is in China then score=100
support for a generic lookup list of cidr blocks would get another 9%
I agree that geographically
On 5/19/2004 7:06 PM, James Couzens wrote:
I just did this on 5 spam in my mail box, I got:
[domains ommitted--tripped my filters]
my last 10 survivors are at http://www.ehsco.com/misc/last-10-spams.eml
the relevant data for them in order of occurrance is below.
eight are CN, one is KR, one
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 17:47, Randy Bush wrote:
gosh! maybe someone should set up a mailing list to discuss
spam, anti-spam, ...?
you mean they have? well, then maybe a bunch of us network
operators (as opposed to spam weenies) should go over there
and talk about sdh, router configs,
The same document that fully ignores that port number
randomness will severely limit the risk of susceptibility
to such an attack?
How many zombies would it take to search the port number
space exhaustively?
Irrelevant.
The limiting factor here is how many packets can make it to
Folks, If I may offer a humble opinion here before this gets out of hand.
I see many (me included) trying to side step the issue that SMTP is a broken
and insecure protocol for that of electronic messages(ing). I see folks
blacklisting,
RBLing, and other methods in an attempt to fix the issue,
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/messages/messages-19.html
Attention Hotmail and MSN users
Hotmail and MSN mail users are currently experiencing delays of up to 1 day
in receiving Groups messages. If delays exceed this, we may begin to not
deliver older messages.
We are sorry that you are
28 matches
Mail list logo
