On 27 Jul 2004, at 10:13, Joe Abley wrote:
On 27 Jul 2004, at 08:10, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
if there is an ssh enabled ios (i presume thats an cisco 2511), then
you could do an flash and mem upgrade before login.
There are ssh loads for the 2511, because I've downloaded them and
loaded them on
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ingo Flasch
berger writes:
>
>also telnet is sometimes the last chance over "full" lines (encryption
>likes packetloss)
>
This doesn't make much sense. ssh and telnet both run over TCP; TCP
handles any lost packets. If you're talking about IPsec, it was
engine
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
random bit errors. But the latter is very unlikely -- you were talking
about congestion -- and the effect of the former is minimal compared to
the speed of any likely line.
Some people run queuing algorithms based on packet size on narrow links.
Pete
Last draft appeared to be
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-retana-marp-02.txt
which expired Sept 2003 (Abstract: defines a protocol to quickly determine
the existence or aliveness of devices attached to a shared media
(broadcast) subnet.)
First read about it in this presentation, where
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Michel Py wrote:
Joe Abley wrote:
There are no ssh loads for the 2511 that allow you to actually
use ssh with a non-null cypher without triggering watchdog
timers on the router though, last time I checked.
Same here. There is more CPU power in a dishwasher than in a 2611 these
MP> Michel Py typed:
MP> Same here. There is more CPU power in a dishwasher than in
MP> a 2611 these days.
> Rafi Sadowsky
> Did you mean a 2511?
Doh, yes! Thanks for correcting. The 2600 is quite more capable, that
would be a DVR not a dishwasher (no joke: the TiVo DVR is a low-end
PowerPC with
Carlson Per <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on cisco-nsp about this
subject that BFD probably won over MARP:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-katz-ward-bfd-02.txt
... noting that a few other I-Ds built forward on BFD rather than MARP.
-- Niels.
--
Today's subliminal thought is:
>> Michel Py wrote:
>> Dumb Cisco/SSH question: how do you get a banner to
>> display _before_ the ssh user/pass prompts?
> Christopher McCrory wrote:
> On older IOS images with SSH protocol 1 , you can't
> because the protocol does not support it. You need
> SSH protocol 2. IIRC, only found in
The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
linked to ad.doubleclick.net
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 27 11:37:36 2004
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:34:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DNS?
The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
causing apparent web page sl
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
Adding an entry in LMHOSTS or /etc/hosts pointing ad.doubleclick.net
to 127.0.0.1 is generally a good idea, especially if
Sounds neat idea, worth giving a try.
Mehmet Akcin
www.akcin.net
-Özgün İleti-
Kimden: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yerine Ricardo
"Rick" Gonzalez
Tarih: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 7:59 PM
Kime: Sean Donelan
Bilgi: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Konu: Re: ad.doubleclick.net missing from DN
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:34:04PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
Actually, it appears to me that all of dclk's nam
> Adding an entry in LMHOSTS or /etc/hosts pointing ad.doubleclick.net
> to 127.0.0.1 is generally a good idea, especially if you value your
> privacy.
Better still, run an http listener on (for example) 127.0.0.2 port 80,
using the appropriate /etc/hosts glue to map whatever hostnames you
like t
Once upon a time, Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
It looks like the problem isn't that the A record is missing, it
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:00:44 +0300, Petri Helenius said:
> Some people run queuing algorithms based on packet size on narrow links.
Well... if you're queueing biggest-packet-first, yes, the ssh can get starved
indefinitely if there's enough web browsers downloading pages or P2P traffic.
If you'r
Stephen Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Better still, run an http listener on (for example) 127.0.0.2 port
> 80, using the appropriate /etc/hosts glue to map whatever hostnames
> you like to that address, and answer requests with null content; the
> remainder of the page will complete fa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it *could* make connecting to shoot that port that's spewing ICMP at
line rates a bit challenging, but you knew that when you chose the queueing
algorithm, right?
There is also an infinite supply of idiots and mediocre network
engineers. Breaking up stuff is easier
Does anyone have any experience with GBIC-based CWDM and/or DWDM optical
add/drop muxes (OADM)? I'm presently looking at the Cisco product lines
which combines GBICs with passive multiplexors and am curious as to
alternative manufacturers and the experiences other might have in these
types of
I have been pretty happy with the MRV box. It is passive and it not
manageable like an ONS etc. It has been rock solid for some time.
www.mrv.com
Specifically, we are using the CWDM EM316PAMULC. The only bad thing I would
say is there is often a several week delay on delivery of ordered parts.
> So, it *is* possible to use ssh to connect to a 2511, at least a 2511
> with absolutely nothing else to do. Whether or not this will be useful
> will depend on how busy your router is.
as i said in my original post, i am using the 2511 as the terminal
server for a bunch of out-of-band console
> There is also an infinite supply of idiots and mediocre network
> engineers. Breaking up stuff is easier than making it robust
Ettore Bugatti, maker of the finest cars of his day, was once asked
why his cars had less than perfect brakes. He replied something
like, "Any fool can make a car sto
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) [Tue 27 Jul 2004, 21:22 CEST]:
> Ettore Bugatti, maker of the finest cars of his day, was once asked
> why his cars had less than perfect brakes. He replied something
> like, "Any fool can make a car stop. It takes a genius to make a
> car go."
Luckily, these da
Is anyone else on NANOG having problems with Barracuda today? I'm
getting massive latency (3000+ seconds) and it seems as if their tech
support has gone into meltdown. While on hold I was even connected to
another customer with the same problem.
--
Joe Hamelin
Edmonds, WA, US
On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 18:49, John Bittenbender wrote:
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/22/HNmicrosoftid_1.html
>
> As a side note, I notice that the article mentions a submission to the
> IETF but I haven't seen any RFC's related, if there is one out there
> can someone please point it out
Does anyone have any experience with GBIC-based CWDM and/or DWDM optical
add/drop muxes (OADM)? I'm presently looking at the Cisco product lines
which combines GBICs with passive multiplexors and am curious as to
alternative manufacturers and the experiences other might have in these types
of
Sean Donelan([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2004.07.27 12:34:04 +:
> The A record for ad.doubleclick.net is missing from DNS. This is
> causing apparent web page slowdowns when viewing web sites containing ads
> linked to ad.doubleclick.net
Short remedy recipee:
- Download Firefox -> http://www.mozilla.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18735-2004Jul27.html
DoubleClick spokeswoman Jennifer Blum said the attack targeted the
company's domain name servers (DNS) -- machines that help direct
Internet traffic -- causing "severe service disruptions" for all 900 of
its customers. Bl
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 13:38, James Couzens wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 18:49, John Bittenbender wrote:
> > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/22/HNmicrosoftid_1.html
> >
> > As a side note, I notice that the article mentions a submission to the
> > IETF but I haven't seen any RFC's related
While I disagree with the method of the attacker, I
can understand the reasoning behind an attack on a
company that is considered a spyware company,
doubleclick certainly has turned up more than once on
my version of spybot as a site to block.
-Henry
--- Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Now the question is, can one easily block all of doubleclick.net by 127.0.0.1 in the
hosts file
on a wincrash box? They appear to have ad, ad2, ad3, m2, m3.doubleclick.net. Anyone
know
what hosts to list??? (ie: ad2, ad3 ... to ad???)
- Original Message -
From: "Henry Linneweh" <[EMAI
You may be interested in:
http://www.cubeoptics.com/
Passive CWDM devices available with SC or LC connector cable
pigtails on them... I believe you can get models to split
orr or add just a single wavelength to a 4 or 8 wavelength mux.
Greg Schwimer wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with G
I got my list from somewhere else, but lost the link. Try:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=hosts+ad+blocking+servers&btnG=Google+Search
Lot's there.
JMH
John Palmer wrote:
Now the question is, can one easily block all of doubleclick.net by 127.0.0.1 in the
hosts file
on a wincrash b
I just talked to Heather (sales) at Barracuda and was told that there
would be a FIRMWARE release in the morning to fix a problem with virus
detection.
It seems that the support ppl can't really do anything right now and
their phone system is melting. The word is to hold tight for a fix.
--
Jo
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:22:25 -1000 Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is also an infinite supply of idiots and mediocre network
> > engineers. Breaking up stuff is easier than making it robust
> Ettore Bugatti, maker of the finest cars of his day, was once asked
> why his cars had
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Richard Welty wrote:
> you can tell someone has become an intermediate driver because
> they start regularly trashing their brakes.
>
> you can tell someone has become an advanced driver when they
> learn how to go even faster while not trashing their brakes.
brakes?? o
** Reply to message from "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:50:19 +0100 (BST)
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> > you can tell someone has become an intermediate driver because
> > they start regularly trashing their brakes.
> >
> > you can tell someone
My Series 400 seems to be doing fine today. Average queue latency 4
seconds which is about normal.
Do you have any special config settings?
-Matt
On Jul 27, 2004, at 7:21 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
I just talked to Heather (sales) at Barracuda and was told that there
would be a FIRMWARE release in
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 18:21, John Palmer wrote:
>
> Now the question is, can one easily block all of doubleclick.net by 127.0.0.1 in the
> hosts file
> on a wincrash box? They appear to have ad, ad2, ad3, m2, m3.doubleclick.net. Anyone
> know
> what hosts to list??? (ie: ad2, ad3 ... to ad???)
> > ... what hosts to list??? (ie: ad2, ad3 ... to ad???)
>
> Been fixing that for a good 6 years now. Just setup your local name
> servers to be authoritative for doubleclick.net and don't put any A
> records in the file. Works like a charm. ;-)
on the one hand, you'd need a wildcard A RR at *.
Paul Vixie wrote:
on the other hand, if you do this for a nameserver that your customers
depend on, then there is probably some liability for either trademark
infringement, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage,
and the gods alone know what else. if you do this, keep it to a s
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 21:44, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> on the one hand, you'd need a wildcard A RR at *.doubleclick.net to
> achieve this result. the above text does not mention this, and leads
> one to believe that an apex A RR at doubleclick.net would have an effect.
Depends what you are trying to
It only seems to be a problem when I hit above about 16k messages an
hour. I do wish they had better numerical historical logging. Maybe
in V3.0.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:03:08 -0400, Matthew Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My Series 400 seems to be doing fine today. Average queue laten
Hey Everyone,
I am building out a customer that needs more than 1000Mbps of sustained
bandwidth. Because of the customer equipment, etherchannel was suggested
as the means to do this (it is compatible with this customers equipment).
I am running a 6509 with Dual SUP720's in IOS mode only (no ca
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:51:26 EDT, Gerald said:
>
> > I think this will be the next best thing in E-mail. I'd love for that date
> > to be August 1 though.
>
> OK... Aug 1 is a weekish away. Check your inbound mail for today, and ask
> yourself ho
Do you need VLAN support or just a routed interface ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard J. Sears
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:23 PM
To: Nanog
Subject: COnfiguration Suggestion - Etherchannel
Hey Everyone,
I am building out a c
Robert,
Just a routed interface.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:40:16 -0400
"Robert Crowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you need VLAN support or just a routed interface ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Richard J. Sears
> Sent: Tu
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 07:23:29PM -0700, Richard J. Sears wrote:
>
> Hey Everyone,
>
> I am building out a customer that needs more than 1000Mbps of sustained
> bandwidth. Because of the customer equipment, etherchannel was suggested
> as the means to do this (it is compatible with this custom
Richard J. Sears wrote:
I am building out a customer that needs more than 1000Mbps of sustained
bandwidth. Because of the customer equipment, etherchannel was suggested
as the means to do this (it is compatible with this customers equipment).
I am running a 6509 with Dual SUP720's in IOS mode only
> Richard J. Sears wrote:
> I am running a 6509 with Dual SUP720's in IOS mode only
>(no cat software). It was pointed out that there are really
> two different ways to configure the switch - I guess my
> question is which is the best (lowest overhead, etc)?
The two you posted are equivalent; th
Mike Sawicki wrote:
I would use method #2 above.. L3 FEC produces better balancing
results as it is flow based, rather than mac-based. I'm not 100%
certain that using the SVI interface would not produce a proper
balance, but I doubt it. Using method one I would expect only one
of the links to be
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 19:38, Mike Leber wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:51:26 EDT, Gerald said:
> >
> > > I think this will be the next best thing in E-mail. I'd love for that date
> > > to be August 1 though.
> >
> > OK... Aug 1 is a weekish away
52 matches
Mail list logo
