RE: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Michel Py
Alexei Roudnev wrote: (but we still like old and cheap 2x1Ggz servers, able to do 99% of all tasks). Barely worth it anymore, these days you can find an Intel Server Chassis SR2300 and Intel Server Board SE7501WV2 (SCSI) for $1,500; it's a 2U dual-Xeon dual-channel DDR with 6 hot-swap scsi

Re: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Joshua Brady
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:10:09 -0700, Michel Py [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexei Roudnev wrote: (but we still like old and cheap 2x1Ggz servers, able to do 99% of all tasks). Barely worth it anymore, these days you can find an Intel Server Chassis SR2300 and Intel Server Board SE7501WV2

RE: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Erik Bais
Michel Py wrote: Terminators are a thing of the past; as a matter of fact, in California and especially in Sacramento they're called governators now. You mean, they'll be back ? With kind regards, Erik Bais I S - I N T E R N E D - S E R V I C E S - B V domeinregistratie -

Test, please ignore

2004-08-01 Thread Michael Hallgren
test

RE: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Paul Jakma
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, Michel Py wrote: For PCs I install dual Xeons on every production machine for example, even though the CPU power needed for some is a 486; What a mad idea. Intel dont do fault-tolerant SMP. Running SMP will lower your MTBF just by fact that you now have 2 CPUs. Then there's

RE: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Michel Py
Michel Py wrote: Terminators are a thing of the past; as a matter of fact, in California and especially in Sacramento they're called governators now. Erik Bais wrote: You mean, they'll be back? :-D Only once, and this model is obsolete and can't be upgraded to presidentor. Paul Jakma

Re: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:44:13AM -0700, Michel Py wrote: In other words, I don't really care if the second processor reduces the MTBF from 200k hours to 60k hours, but I do care if the second processor reduces the time to restore service from 24 hours to 20 minutes (7.5 minutes for SNMP to

RE: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Paul Jakma
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Michel Py wrote: True; this would be like raid-0 arrays, the more disks the greater the chance of failure. This holds true for most RAID-x levels. In other words, I don't really care if the second processor reduces the MTBF from 200k hours to 60k hours, but I do care if the

Re: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
Michel Py [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The dead processor still has to be replaced, but this is scheduled maintenance, not outage. A little extra ammo when you have to hunt five or six nines. MTTR on a single box is irrelevant when you are off playing Ponce de Leon, hunting the Fountain of

Re: Quick question.

2004-08-01 Thread Paul Jakma
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, John Underhill wrote: Not necessarily. There have been a number of innovations in recent years in the area of integrated fault tolerance, including bios level controls over component monitoring / management. Some of the more upscale Compaq G3 servers for instance, can remove a