Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
'fantasy mail' is what we call this :( It's a pain and you have to port25
filter in AND out :(
that must have been a nightmare especially with a large provider of
dialup pops for a whole lot of ISPs .. not as much as the filtering as
keeping track of the holes you pun
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > 'fantasy mail' is what we call this :( It's a pain and you have to port25
> > filter in AND out :(
>
> that must have been a nightmare especially with a large provider of
> dialup pops for a whole lot of ISPs .
now why wasnt i bright enough to think of radius
never mind, i think i got the hang of where to look for cookie cutter
samples ...
thanks!
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
radius profile based filters, sorry I should have been more clear about
that.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> now why wasnt i bright enough to think of radius
>
> never mind, i think i got the hang of where to look for cookie cutter
> samples ...
>
twasn't me who thought of it either :)
> thanks!
>
> Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > radius profil
> since when nanog-l turned into gmailswaps.com ?
He's not being sarcastic. There really are gmail swapping
sites at http://www.gmailswap.com and http://www.gmailtrader.com
--Michael Dillon
Wi-Fi emerges as emergency communications alternative in Fla.
Some cellular carriers are still struggling with power outages
News Story by Bob Brewin
AUGUST 19, 2004 (COMPUTERWORLD) - Public access Wi-Fi hot spots have
become a key communications alternative in Florida in the wake of
Hurricane C
> Oh come on, what do they think we are some kind of super idiots?
> *dials phone number* Anyone happen to know the punishment for this
> kind of crime, so I can call his local police?
It's not from Nigeria!
> Please contact your claims agent immediately,to begin your claims
process;
>
> MR. T
Deepak Jain [Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 01:37:54AM -0400]:
> >You know, I'm having trouble finding people that *don't* have gmail.com
> >accounts already. :P
> >
> >-Jonathan "G-mail-less" Nichols
> >
>
> If we are all network operators, exactly what is the benefit of having a
> 1GB mailbox operated b
This report has been generated at Fri Aug 20 21:42:33 2004 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2004, at 3:06 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>
> > Are you saying that those ridiculous boilerplate disclaimers similar to
> > the following that annoyingly appear tagged to email (including that
> > sent
> > to public mailing lists) really
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:37:03 -0600, Byron L.Hicks wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In the last couple of days, I have received complaints from
> customers not able to receive email from certain sites. From
> these sites, I can't connect to our mail server, on other
On Aug 20, 2004, at 9:25 AM, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
i got told otherwise, but again this hasnt been tested in a court by
me. i
forget the exact detail in the conversation but it was comparing the
disclaimer
to what you get in regular mail.. so things like confidentiality,
opening an
attachment
> I've found a similar problem... From www.traceroute.org i can trace to a
> server from some countries and not others... and even some states and
> not others...
This is something that was seen when DCEF over so-called parallel
paths was commonly used. It was a result of a hashing algorithm
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:34:31 EDT, Patrick W Gilmore said:
> Bringing this back on topic, IFF that can be extended to e-mail (and my
> understanding is that it can), the disclaimer is worthless - at least
> the part about having to delete it.
I often send the miscreants a pointer to Peter Guttma
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:57:46 -0700, Owen DeLong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah... But, the problem here is you registered "godengatevw.com" and
> "haywardvw.com". They'd have a much harder time fending off an en
> pro per motion for summary dismissal if you had registered domains
> like "godeng
As I have seen the past few days, Susan seems to think quite a bit is
off topic...my personal perception of NANOG is it is a group of
network operators which talk about many things including but not
limited to those of the network operations stand point, I have even
been told that discussing email
Nico Schottelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> P.S.: If you are interested in the background of this story, read
> http://nico.schotteli.us/papers/net/orkut-diary for more information.
My $0.02 social commentary on orkut (and similar social networking
sites) is at http://www.fedster.com/
*.ork
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 20 10:07:59 2004
> Cc: Patrick W Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Patrick W Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: "scanning" e-mail [WAS: 3 Free Gmail invites]
> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:34:31 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> On Aug 20, 2004, at 9:25 A
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 21 Aug, 2004
Can someone from the savvis / c&w IP routing contact me offlist quickly?
Thanks,
/micah
Does anyone know of a solution that offers
precise methods of tracking bandwidth utilizations at the per Megabyte or
Gigabyte level and not at the rate of transfer level?
Some people are asking me if we can bill them in this
manner, and I'm questioning whether the stats that
DW> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:06:42 -0400
DW> From: Drew Weaver
DW> Does anyone know of a solution that offers precise methods of
DW> tracking bandwidth utilizations at the per Megabyte or
DW> Gigabyte level and not at the rate of transfer level?
Rate of transfer is determined using byte counter
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:04:57 +0100, Per Gregers Bilse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 1:07pm, Joshua Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > been a core part of the network? I am all for Matt talking about the
> > litigation of this case, its a quite common thing now in the wonderful
> > wor
DW> Does anyone know of a solution that offers precise methods of
DW> tracking bandwidth utilizations at the per Megabyte or
DW> Gigabyte level and not at the rate of transfer level?
Rate of transfer is determined using byte counters.
[Eddy is saying "yes" in the above line].
I'm not sure that wou
On Aug 20, 2004, at 5:06 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Does anyone know of a solution that offers precise methods
of tracking bandwidth utilizations at the per Megabyte or Gigabyte
level and not at the rate of transfer level?
Some people are asking me if we can bill them in this manner, a
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Does anyone know of a solution that offers precise methods of
> tracking bandwidth utilizations at the per Megabyte or Gigabyte level and
> not at the rate of transfer level?
I've used a tool called "IOG", which works to some extent, but it lo
This won't work for resold ports, but we used to do all of our [dialup]
filtering on the NAS. We could still do so with our TC1000's, but it's
much simpler to do it with radius if you have multiple ISP's using the
same box.
Bob Martin
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Suresh Ram
Recently my DS3 has been turned up to 8 megabits. How can I test to see if I can
actually achieve that throughput?
Online bandwidth test sites are only good for up to 5mb at the most, and my upstream
doesn't have a method to test that.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
--
Bubba
Send a (big) file to somewhere with enough bandwidth to max out your upload.
Perhaps sending a big attachment to Yahoo or Gmail while keeping an eye on
the traffic logs might work.
>
> Recently my DS3 has been turned up to 8 megabits. How can I test to see if
> I can actually achieve that throug
>quote who="Bubba Parker">
>
> Recently my DS3 has been turned up to 8 megabits. How can I test to see if
> I can actually achieve that throughput?
> Online bandwidth test sites are only good for up to 5mb at the most, and
> my upstream doesn't have a method to test that.
We've been LART'ing som
> You know, I'm having trouble finding people that *don't* have gmail.com
> accounts already. :P
i don't, mainly because i have no idea why i would want one. same
for all these multiply.com invites.
randy
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: OT - 3 Free Gmail invites
>
> > You know, I'm having trouble finding people that *don't* have gmail.com
> >
32 matches
Mail list logo
