Need I say more...?
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/9411
My thanks to those who listened and helped me. My thanks to those who
helped Spamhaus, and my thanks to anyone else who got involved with the
whole deal.
/ Mat
) .
This Advisory is available at
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040827-telnet.shtml.
Affected Products
=
Vulnerable Products
- ---
This vulnerability affects all Cisco devices that permit access via
telnet or reverse telnet and are running an unfixed
This report has been generated at Fri Aug 27 21:42:49 2004 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table
If someone owns their own /20which they
received from Arin back in the day and they want to subnet and use part of it
(/24)in Europe. Would their be any problems if the wanted to advertise the
North American issuedspace from a European AS? I knowthey would not
begood Internet citizen, butif
I have a friend whom has a
problem with we believe DNS. In this case the ISP is NTL. He has a
stateful firewall and is running NAT you can see from the tcp dump below that
he sends the query to one DNS server but another responds thus breaking the
firewall state and therefore it never
On 27 Aug 2004, at 08:13, Rick Lowery wrote:
If someone owns their own /20 which they received from Arin back in
the day and they want to subnet and use part of it (/24) in Europe.
Would their be any problems if the wanted to advertise the North
American issued space from a European AS?
There
(Can you turn off HTML when posting to lists? TIA)
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilbert) [Fri 27 Aug 2004, 14:49 CEST]:
I have a friend whom has a problem with we believe DNS. In this case the
ISP is NTL. He has a stateful firewall and is running NAT you can see from
the tcp dump below that
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:13:41AM -0400, Rick Lowery wrote:
If someone owns their own /20 which they received from Arin back
in the day and they want to subnet and use part of it (/24) in Europe.
Would their be any problems if the wanted to advertise the North
American issued space from a
http://news.com.com/VeriSign%27s+antitrust+suit+against+ICANN+dismissed/2100-1030_3-5326136.html?tag=nefd.top
Hi All,
I'm looking for an admin bod @fastmail.fm - anybody have a contact to
lend me off-list?
Many thanks,
George
--
George Barnett
Reality Engineer Explorer
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m: +44 778 884 7205
Things must be as they may
- William Shakespear, Henry V
One stupid lawsuit from Verisign down...one more stupid lawsuit from SCO to
go
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Henry Linneweh
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VeriSign's antitrust suit against ICANN
Wow...
Glad to see we know the real reason foonet got raided.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew Sullivan
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 4:41 AM
To: nanog
Subject: On the back of other security posts (well some over a year ago
now)
On Aug 27, 2004, at 8:58 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 27 Aug 2004, at 08:13, Rick Lowery wrote:
I know they would not be good Internet citizen, but if they needed to
do this for a temp basis does anyone see an issue?
There's not much bad citizenry in what you are suggesting: the
assigning-RIR
Hope that more than a few here will be interested in some of my
recent conclusions - from the November issue that I just published.
Why a Layered Model is the Only Reasonable Way to Evaluate Telecom
Lines of Business Have Blurred - Making the Regulatory Concept of
Vertical Silos Archaic
Time
seems like a moment to announce a conference dedicated to burying the
polemics:
Nethead/Bellhead: The FCC Takes On the Internet
www.cardozobellhead.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gordon Cook
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 11:40 AM
To:
Not exactly, as apparently they can take it back to the state courts.
--
Jeff Wheeler
Postmaster, Network Admin
US Institute of Peace
On Aug 27, 2004, at 10:51 AM, Hosman, Ross wrote:
One stupid lawsuit from Verisign down...one more stupid lawsuit from
SCO to
go
-Original Message-
From:
Actually Sprint continued filtering for 2 years after Sean left.
jon
Anyone knows who filters these days? Sprint stopped when Sean left.
--
TTFN,
patrick
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:16:40AM -0400, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
Anyone knows who filters these days? Sprint stopped when Sean left.
Verio stopped when Randy left. I don't know anyone beating that drum
any more. (Kinda nice, actually.) I've heard some Asian ISPs do, but
don't
What strikes me as interesting is the fact that someone did hundreds of
thousands of dollars worth of damage in exchange for -- a shell account??
This is beyond idiotic.
Joe
On 8/27/04 7:56 AM, Hosman, Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow...
Glad to see we know the real reason foonet got
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 28 Aug, 2004
- Original Message -
From: joe mcguckin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NANOG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: On the back of other security posts (well some over a year ago
now)
What strikes me as interesting is the fact that someone did hundreds of
netheaded was seen as the 'nirvana' to which the Internet would
guide telecommunications.
And I've been netheaded since '95. ;)
--
Joe Hamelin [EMAIL PROTECTED]/.org/.us/.org.uk
Edmonds, WA, US
Hi,
I'm currently looking into how to best integrate 10G lambda
lines into a network. The two obvious ways are via native
SDH/SONET or via 10 GE WAN PHY, but the latter isn't available
on any router platform so far.
What I like with 10GE is that its possible to run a ring
segment via
No it was because we (Sprint, where I worked at that time) still felt that
it was valuable. The change happened a couple of months after I left. From
what I was told when the change happened, it was decided that it was no
longer more important to do, then the pain it caused, because of
massive
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
4 port OC192 IR $1030k
Is there anyone who can justify this pricing
with anything else than because we can?
That's a heck of a good reason! Any for-profit business tries hard to
position themselves where they could name their price.
This pricing is consistent with
Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
There is zero bad citizenry in this, and don't
let anyone tell you differently.
I agree, but not for the reason below:
It is your netblock, you get to use it as needed.
This is not a good reason; it might be a good excuse, but not a good
reason.
This is much
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Michel Py wrote:
so darn pricey it's because it's so darn good. Like Rolls-Royce cars,
the ones that buy them are typically not the ones that drive them, so
technical arguments tend to become irrelevant.
If the VSR card was $899k, the SR card was $999k and the LR card
27 matches
Mail list logo
