At 10:24 PM 06-09-04 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Simon Leinen wrote:
As I said, it would be great if it were possible to build fast networks
with modest buffers, and use end-to-end (TCP) improvements to fill the
needs of the Petabyte/Internet2 Land Speed Record crowd.
I
vijay,
vg Lets see Malayasia
vg Indonesia
Over the last few months, I have had no problems using my Cingular GSM
Treo calling the US from Malaysia, Indonesia and China. Haven' tried
calling to other countries, though. (And this is probably the only
positive thing I can find to say about
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 09:29:59AM +0800, Joe Shen wrote:
What does find in the report mean? no lookup
timeout or no out-of-sync?
I guess you mean fine!. That means that I've found no problems
with the respective zone.
Best regards,
Daniel
>From Philip Smith.
Begin forwarded message:
Subject: APRICOT 2005 Fellowship and CFP Announcement
Hi everyone,
Please find below the call for presentations and tutorials for the APRICOT 2005 conference in Kyoto, Japan.
philip
--
CALL FOR APRICOT 2005 CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS AND TUTORIALS
Bill Manning wrote:
From Philip Smith.
Begin forwarded message:
Well - that's the call for papers.
As nanog is read by far more than just people from the USA - the
fellowship information is at http://www.2005.apricot.net/fellowship.html
for those who want to apply for fellowships.
regards
srs
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
I think SPF is an important step in getting rid of people
pretending to be someone else. If you have SPF records, and they
match the mail, chances are you are who you say you are.
Not really. For that you need X.509 or PGP and web-of-trust.
Also, SPF
not in all areas
they are not at any of the retail stores here.
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 18:58, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Fwiw, XP SP2 CDs are available at some PC retail outlets. I picked one
up from Best Buy late last week, and saw them again at a CompUSA over
the weekend. As with the download,
Robert Blayzor wrote:
One would hope that they're rejecting the incoming mail with a 400
series error and not 500 series.
Where does the 400lb gorilla lie down ? Whereever it likes.
AOL does pretty much anything it wants to. If they start 500'ing your mail,
it becomes your problem. Unless you
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 04:15, Peter Galbavy wrote:
Robert Blayzor wrote:
One would hope that they're rejecting the incoming mail with a 400
series error and not 500 series.
Where does the 400lb gorilla lie down ? Whereever it likes.
AOL does pretty much anything it wants to. If they
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 15:41, Sean Donelan wrote:
Due to a generator failure, 292 Sprint wireless towers in Polk, Pasco,
Hillsborough, Pinellas, Manatee, Hardee, Sarasota and Charlotte counties
were disrupted. There is no estimated time for restoration of power
to the Sprint switch serving
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 11:32:11AM +0100,
Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
Also, SPF doesnt tell you whether it is spam.
Of course. It never pretended to do so.
Indeed, apparently majority of SPF-valid email at moment is spam!
No. Where did you find
I have had my mail rejected by AOL in the past. I found their error
messages very descriptive and the AOL mail team very responsive. The
problem was on my end and I found and fixed it. Have you gone to the
AOL mail website yet? Go to http://postmaster.aol.com/ it pretty
much tells you
At 07:27 AM 07/09/2004, Thornton wrote:
Only thing you can do is try to call them but that probably wont get you
anywhere. If you have enough customers on AOL they can complain and if
you really have a lot could get it removed.
But for the most part your just SOL
Thats not been our experience at
Peter Galbavy wrote:
Where does the 400lb gorilla lie down ? Whereever it likes.
AOL does pretty much anything it wants to. If they start 500'ing your
mail, it becomes your problem. Unless you have a large budget and a good
legal team.
I'm not calling them out on it, I'm just stating that
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Thornton wrote:
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 15:41, Sean Donelan wrote:
Due to a generator failure, 292 Sprint wireless towers in Polk, Pasco,
Hillsborough, Pinellas, Manatee, Hardee, Sarasota and Charlotte counties
were disrupted. There is no estimated time for restoration
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Thats not been our experience at all. On the 2 times we have had to talk
to them we didnt have much trouble getting through to someone clueful and
useful. Compared to the other big providers I have dealt with in the past
they were by far the most
Robert Blayzor wrote:
I'm not calling them out on it, I'm just stating that rejecting mail
with a 500 series error due to a PTR record not being looked up will
cause more problems and benefit. Temporary DNS errors do occur so
slapping mail with a 500 could and will reject legit mail. Of
Hi,
I'm interested in experiences (good and bad) that people have had with
various TDM over IP products.
If people can reply off-list I'll post a summary to the list in a day or
two.
Sam
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Jon Lewis wrote:
Any network that doesn't already have it, I highly recommend signing up
for AOL's feedback loop (aka scomp reports) at
http://postmaster.aol.com/tools/fbl.html. This will give you a sort of
early warning system notifying you of spam issues on your
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 07:59, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Jon Lewis wrote:
Any network that doesn't already have it, I highly recommend signing up
for AOL's feedback loop (aka scomp reports) at
http://postmaster.aol.com/tools/fbl.html. This will give you a sort of
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
And you will also get random emails that your users have sent to AOL users,
who then click on Report as spam seemingly at random.
I've received Spam reports on e-mail asking when someone's kids should be
picked up at school, giving
: From: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
: Date: Sun Aug 29 14:13:09 2004
:
: Thirty-five years after computer scientists at UCLA linked two bulky
: computers using a 15-foot gray cable, testing a new way to exchange data
: over networks, what would ultimately become the Internet remains a work
: in
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Jon Lewis wrote:
Yeah...there's a certain amount of GIGO since the scomp system relies on
the lusers to decide what's spam and what's not...but that's not a serious
problem. IME, AOL won't block you unless you're getting thousands of
scomp complaints/day and seem to be
Hi folks.
What is the most common way of doing MPLS signaling for LSP setup and
End to End QoS enforcement ?
LDP ? RSVP ? BGP-TE or OSPF-TE ?
Thanx
Paul
Paul Khavkine
Network Administrator
DISTRIBUTEL Communications.
740 Notre Dame West,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:14:05AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 07:27 AM 07/09/2004, Thornton wrote:
Only thing you can do is try to call them but that probably wont get you
anywhere.
Thats not been our experience at all. On the 2 times we have had to talk
to them we didnt have much
FWIW, SP2 rendered my Sony Vaio PCG-SR17 completely useless. From what
I can tell, it replaced the PCMCIA bridge driver (pcmcia.sys) with one
that does not work, and there is no way to roll back the driver to
the pre-XP2 one without rolling back the entire OS.
I am in an ongoing dialog with MS
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Also, SPF doesnt tell you whether it is spam.
Of course. It never pretended to do so.
Right, but a lot of seem people to be under the mistaken impression
it will have some effect on spam.
No. Where did you find the figures?
Florida EOC reports 1.1 million wireline customer outages state-wide.
30% cell phone coverage outage reported. Coordinating communication set
snip
How about colo and transit?
I have a friend (and competitor in some niche hosting markets) in
South Florida who appears to have been blown off the
Try @aliant.ca (note the one L). Bell.ca (BCE) is a majority owner in
Aliant which is an amalgamation of the various old provincial incumbent
telcos and they are just finishing up a nasty protracted strike as well.
---Mike
At 01:52 PM 07/09/2004, Dave Dennis wrote:
Greetings,
RSVP is commonly used for LSP signaling/setup at least in one of the largest
tier one's MPLS architecture. I'm not sure how many large ISPs use e2e QoS
enforcement (none in my experience with public IP networks). Several use
DSCP (actually IP Precedence) at the edge (CPE to ISP edge only).
On 09/07/04, Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Also, SPF doesnt tell you whether it is spam.
Of course. It never pretended to do so.
Right, but a lot of seem people to be under the mistaken impression
it will have some effect on spam.
Folks, operational value is CALEA compliance. FYI. Note: Randy Bush has
generously contributed cycles to a list at PSG.COM to engage in
lawful intercept discussions (technical/psuedo-legal)
that are off-topic to NANOG.
If enough people indicate interest in a private followup, I'll
summarize
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jakma) writes:
SPF is worthless.
i don't agree. i think it's overengineered and that a simpler solution like
the one at http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt should have been deployed
years ago, but i don't think SPF, or things like SPF, are at all worthless.
every
So most people do manual QoS/bandwidth provisioning ?
I'm looking into this for L2 over MPLS VPN (Martini draft).
Thanx
Paul
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Rump Bryant wrote:
RSVP is commonly used for LSP signaling/setup at least in one of the largest
tier one's MPLS architecture. I'm not sure how
Dear Nanog Readers,
I want to thank everyone that corrected my typo mistake, the domain for email
was correct locally, then I did not cut/paste it into the nanog mail, resulting
in a typo which many were quick to spot. Thanks for the attention to detail!
Was also thanks to the list able to
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Jon Lewis wrote:
Any network that doesn't already have it, I highly recommend signing up
for AOL's feedback loop (aka scomp reports) at
http://postmaster.aol.com/tools/fbl.html. This will give you a sort of
early warning system notifying you
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Paul Vixie wrote:
i don't agree. i think it's overengineered and that a simpler
solution like the one at http://sa.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt
oh, hear hear.
Then there's Sender-ID. Bulky XML in DNS, sigh.
should have been deployed years ago, but i don't think SPF, or
things
On 09/07/04, Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then there's Sender-ID. Bulky XML in DNS, sigh.
No, that was CallerID. SenderID uses a format that looks and
smells almost exactly like SPF.
I only mention this to reduce the FUD.
--
J.D. Falk
ranting lunatic
SP2 will take a long time to even out the quirks from Windows users. We've
burned the image on to a CD for about 2000+ users and have copied the file
on to users' desktops so they can double click on it for the install. For
the most part, students complained about having to wait
39 matches
Mail list logo
