Thanks to all who helped resolve this issue. Our mail people confirm that
they are able to successfully sync with spamhaus
Scott C. McGrath
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Justin Ryburn wrote:
>
> This should be corrected now. I still cannot ping the host in question but
> I
Sorry to bother the whole list with this...could someone involved in
routing at Qwest ping me offlist?
Thanks,
Andrew
This should be corrected now. I still cannot ping the host in question but
I am guessing that spamhaus has ICMP filters on their stuff. It is
definitely routing to the correct place now. Our customer service
department is following up with the customer (spamhaus' provider) to make
sure they are
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 11 Sep, 2004
Please contact me offlist. We're an account client of yours with
periodic trouble getting mail to you for almost a year now, and Id
like to get it resolved.
Looking at this now.
Justin Ryburn
Tier II Router Support
XO Communications
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: Odd behavior from p4-0-0.MAR1.Austin-TX.us.xo.ne
The loop seems to be in AS 2828 (XO Communications) with router at 64.1.2.38.
--Rob Crowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original message -- > > > We are originating traffic from AS11 and we are seeing an apparent loop > downstream from the router listed in the header when attemptin
> > you could bet that by closing off this avenue, SPF will force
> > spammers to use other methods that are more easily detected /
> > filtered, and that if you play this cat&mouse game long enough, it
> > will drive the cost of spam so high (or drive the volume benefit so
> > low) that it'll jus
We are originating traffic from AS11 and we are seeing an apparent loop
downstream from the router listed in the header when attempting to connect
to rsync1.spamhaus.org.
Is this problem unique to us or are others seeing the same behavior.
Scott C. McGrath
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Rachael Treu-Gomes wrote:
> And tunnels in tunnels in tunnels...
>
> I see some deep recursion fun here.
I can see some nice routing loops coming up, with packets for
tunnel endpoints being routed through the tunnel interface
itself, etc... ;)
Rik
--
"Debugging is twice as
This report has been generated at Fri Sep 10 21:50:46 2004 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 01:57:51AM -0700,
Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
> I'm not sure where "true" diverges from reality in your analysis,
> but perhaps you should create one of those mail environments and
> test before you put your foot in your mouth a
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > > In short, if you want to make money selling your patent to someone then you
> > > must have a valid business that loses money so that your lawsuit against
> > > them will have teeth.
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:
Robert Bonomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Same thing applies for 'simple' forwarding via sendmails '~/.forward'
> > mechanism. the mail server 'accepts' the mail from the original source,
> > and then 're-sends' to the new destination. That re-send originates as
> > the _forwarding_party_, WI
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
> > In short, if you want to make money selling your patent to someone then you
> > must have a valid business that loses money so that your lawsuit against
> > them will have teeth.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:46:07AM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> So the atto
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 03:15:14PM -0500,
Robert Bonomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 37 lines which said:
> Same thing applies for 'simple' forwarding via sendmails '~/.forward'
> mechanism. the mail server 'accepts' the mail from the original source,
> and then 're-sends' to the ne
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 04:59:51PM +,
Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 27 lines which said:
> you could bet that by closing off this avenue, SPF will force
> spammers to use other methods that are more easily
> detected/filtered, and that if you play this cat&mouse game lo
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 04:01:46PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > If the patent is strong enough, wouldnt some patent attorney be willing to
> > defend it on a contingency basis?
> > With the potential $$ in a patent violation judgement against verisign, I
>
On 9/9/2004 4:12 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> update SAN FRANCISCO--The Internet needs to be upgraded with a new layer
> of abilities that will deal with imminent problems of capacity, security
> and reliability, Intel Chief Technology Officer Pat Gelsinger said
> Thursday.
hmmph. Many moons ago I u
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:10:21AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> I'm not a router guy (routing atleast), but perhaps there are performance
> problems inside an ASN along a path which you connect to other places? So
> you might lengthen paths through/to that ASN to force traffic across
> ano
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 04:01:46PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> If the patent is strong enough, wouldnt some patent attorney be willing to
> defend it on a contingency basis?
>
> With the potential $$ in a patent violation judgement against verisign, I
> would think attorneys would be all over it
21 matches
Mail list logo
