Daniel Roesen [12/09/04 20:32 +0200]:
> But when it comes to mailing list traffic volume, there is no
> companion that I'm aware of.
I rather believe that's a feature, not a bug
> > The "NOG" philosophy don't work in Europe.
> simply not true. Check out SwiNOG http://www.swinog.ch/
And there's NordNOG.
-Bill
Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
The "NOG" philosophy don't work in Europe.
Same problem of very low activity for local NOG like FRnog,
Swissnog,...
simply not true. Check out SwiNOG http://www.swinog.ch/
mort than 500 subscribers, several closed working groups (antispam,
lawful interception, BBCS), 2 yea
Hi Nicolas
> The "NOG" philosophy don't work in Europe.
That's not correct. The concept works in switzerland with
SwiNOG very well - at least two meetings every year and
a good organized communitiy behind SwiNOG.
http://www.swinog.ch
cheers,
michel
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 20:23, Arnold Nipper wrote:
> On 12.09.2004 20:05 Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
> > http://euronog.org/mailing-lists.php
> *LOL* This list is so dead you won't believe it ...
>
> There is no real correspondent to NANOG in Europe. EOF
> (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/eof/index.html
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 06:55:12PM +0100, Ken Gilmour wrote:
> Does anyone know of a list like nanog for Europe?
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/eof/
But when it comes to mailing list traffic volume, there is no
companion that I'm aware of. Many issues are discussed on other
specialized RIPE mailing
On 12.09.2004 20:05 Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 19:55, Ken Gilmour wrote:
>
> Hi Ken,
>
>
>>Does anyone know of a list like nanog for Europe? I would be interested in
>>subscribing... I've learned a lot from this list but would like to find a closer
>>one as well :-)
>
>
Brilliant thanks!
I got a swiss offlist one too that i subscribed to as well. (looks like they have an
interesting ddos tracking one too!)
Maybe i should have broadened my google search with "euro nog" instead of "european
network operators group".
Thanks for your help
Regards,
Ken
On Sun,
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 19:55, Ken Gilmour wrote:
Hi Ken,
> Does anyone know of a list like nanog for Europe? I would be interested in
> subscribing... I've learned a lot from this list but would like to find a closer
> one as well :-)
http://euronog.org/mailing-lists.php
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROT
Hey there!
Does anyone know of a list like nanog for Europe? I would be interested in
subscribing... I've learned a lot from this list but would like to find a closer
one as well :-)
Thanks for your help
Ken
--
"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make really crappy operating systems."
I have some involvement with a telecom/internet company located in
Grenada. This was sent to me in the last day or so.
> With reference to staff in Grenada, 4 out of 6 involved people are
> accounted for. The country as you are probably aware has lost over half
> it's buildings. Over 90% of the
RG> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:36:58 +0530
RG> From: Rohit Gupta
RG> On a related note : Do ISPs ever tweak around with Local
RG> Prefs and weights so as to select BGP paths with greater AS
RG> PATH length?
Definitely. Case in point: I set up a network a few years ago
that included a choice bet
On Sat, 12 Sep 2004, Sean Donelan wrote:
> The folks with the tinfoil hats are going to need extra shielding.
http://www.politrix.org/mgz/tinfoil.jpg
> If you believe your provider is untrustworthy, mail storage is a small
> part of your problems. An untrustworthy provider doesn't need to run
On Sep 12, 2004, at 8:05 AM, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
Maybe those of you who created accounts using the links provided by
todd
could post some invites.
NOOO! No more Gmail on NANOG!
Before anyone does such a moronic thing, please note that all people
subscribed here, or reading the
I'm looking for operational status information from Grenada, Jamaica,
Grand Caymen, and Cuba. Anyone with clue drop me a note off-list, I
will post a summary.
Nakul Malik wrote:
Maybe those of you who created accounts using the links provided by todd
could post some invites.
-Nakul
Before anyone does such a moronic thing, please note that all people
subscribed here, or reading the archives, now and for the future have
access to the accounts from tho
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > I agree. The privacy implications are *really* scary. (And they're
> > sufficiently worse for non-subscribers that I've contemplated blocking
> > gmail-bound messages from my (personal) systems.)
>
> While we're on _that_ subject, what about Postini
Maybe those of you who created accounts using the links provided by todd
could post some invites.
-Nakul
Nakul Malik
Nakul Malik Consultancy Services
Ph: +91-9811424477
H-342
New Rajendra Nagar
New Delhi - 110060
INDIA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PR
> I'm with Paul on the "makes sense" to run your own personal mail server
> - for me, and others who _can_ run their own mail server. For those
> who can't, public mail servers are all "scary". Gmail is no more scary
> than hotmail, yahoo, msn, verizon, earthlink, or any of a billion other
> m
19 matches
Mail list logo
