Too many nogs- The RIPE NCC ran a Euro Operators
forum that was probably the most useful.
Neil.
On 13.09.2004 11:18 Neil J. McRae wrote:
Too many nogs- The RIPE NCC ran a Euro Operators
forum that was probably the most useful.
1. EOF is still alive though hardly visible/audible.
2. EOF is not a RIPE NCC activity.
Arnold
2. EOF is not a RIPE NCC activity.
Who runs/funds/maintains it then?
Neil.
Hi Nanogers,
A brief introduction before i begin.
I am Abhishek and am doing my masters in Comp Sc. from IT BHU. This is
my first mail to Nanog, which i believe has the most number of network
operators in its list. We have simulated a mini model of the Internet
here in our labs with around 50
- Original Message -
From: Neil J. McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Nicolas DEFFAYET' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Arnold
Nipper' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Ken Gilmour' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:18 AM
Subject: RE: European Nanog?
Too many nogs- The RIPE
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 09:16:33PM +0200, Michel Renfer wrote:
Hi,
The NOG philosophy don't work in Europe.
That's not correct. The concept works in switzerland with
SwiNOG very well - at least two meetings every year and
a good organized communitiy behind SwiNOG.
Agree, here in .nl we
On 13.09.2004 11:37 Neil J. McRae wrote:
2. EOF is not a RIPE NCC activity.
Who runs/funds/maintains it then?
EOF is run my itself and has a status as a RIPE WG, hence imbedded in RIPE.
Arnold
And here I thought I was the only one to seriously consider blocking
gmail
(to and from) because of the security implications.
I find it interesting how many people are concerned with
sending email to gmail users yet are quite willing to send
email to public mailing lists that are archived
So the RIPE NCC - thanks.
EOF is run my itself and has a status as a RIPE WG, hence
imbedded in RIPE.
On 13.09.2004 12:20 Neil J. McRae wrote:
So the RIPE NCC - thanks.
EOF is run my itself and has a status as a RIPE WG, hence
imbedded in RIPE.
As already noted here a couple of times:
RIPE != RIPE NCC
Although MERIT is organizing NANOG meetings, no one would say: MERIT ==
As already noted here a couple of times:
RIPE != RIPE NCC
Although MERIT is organizing NANOG meetings, no one would
say: MERIT == NANOG. Right?
I love the obsession that people have with this!
You can state what you like, but the income from the NCC is
what mostly funds the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone really believe that people will use
gmail as their one and only email account? Perhaps they
are really using it for trading DIVX encoded movies.
After all, the cost of sending a DIVX encoded movie from
one gmail.com mailbox to another gmail.com mailbox is
On 13.09.2004 12:52 Neil J. McRae wrote:
As already noted here a couple of times:
RIPE != RIPE NCC
Although MERIT is organizing NANOG meetings, no one would say:
MERIT == NANOG. Right?
I love the obsession that people have with this!
You can state what you like, but the income
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Arnold Nipper wrote:
As already noted here a couple of times:
RIPE != RIPE NCC
Although MERIT is organizing NANOG meetings, no one would say: MERIT ==
NANOG. Right?
Not quite. As far as I'm concerned, NANOG is part of MERIT activities.
And while I'm not
Hell, I couldn't even log into it. The system was Temporarily
unavailable when I tried.
Curtis
Petri Helenius wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone really believe that people will use
gmail as their one and only email account? Perhaps they
are really using it for trading DIVX encoded
On 13.09.2004 13:27 william(at)elan.net wrote:
I'm not so certain about RIPE NCC to RIPE relationship though, I suspect
that RIPE NCC is a subset (RIR services or) larger RIPE organization that
is involved in other activities, i.e. RIPE NCC RIPE
No, that's not true. There is no order
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ken Gilmour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Does anyone know of a list like nanog for Europe? I would be interested in
subscribing...
If your network is member of LINX or AMS-IX you will find there some
private lists which discuss a European flavour of many of the things I
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:03:57 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find it interesting how many people are concerned with sending email
to gmail users yet are quite willing to send email to public mailing
lists that are archived and indexed by Google.
There is in most cases a significantly lower
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 06:28:36 +0530, the mental interface of Suresh Ramasubramanian
told:
Daniel Roesen [12/09/04 20:32 +0200]:
But when it comes to mailing list traffic volume, there is no
companion that I'm aware of.
I rather believe that's a feature, not a bug
I'd rather have no mails
Top story on Slashdot:
http://it.slashdot.org/it/04/09/13/1317238.shtml?tid=172tid=95tid=218
Zocalo writes The MARID working group at the IETF responsible for
deciding on which extensions to SMTP will be used to try and prevent
spoofing of the sender has made their decision. At issue was
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:58:13AM -0400,
Jeff Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 19 lines which said:
Top story on Slashdot:
http://it.slashdot.org/it/04/09/13/1317238.shtml?tid=172tid=95tid=218
Warning: this is probably non-operational content. I suggest to move
the discussion
If you are in the San Francisco Bay Area, you can join us for a talk I
am giving for the BayLISA (Bay Area Large Installations Systems
Administrators User Group).
http://ww:w.baylisa.org/
and participate to a talk on the design and building of a new open
source system and network management tool.
Greetings.
I was hoping someone could point me in the direction of provider/NAP
prefix filtering policies. Most important to me is UU and Cogent, but a
concise listing of notables would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Jade
Jade E. Deane
Senior Network Engineer
SunGard Futures Systems
SunGard
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 13.09.2004 11:18 Neil J. McRae wrote:
Too many nogs- The RIPE NCC ran a Euro Operators
forum that was probably the most useful.
1. EOF is still alive though hardly visible/audible.
2. EOF is not a RIPE NCC activity.
I'd agree that
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was hoping someone could point me in the direction of provider/NAP
prefix filtering policies. Most important to me is UU and Cogent, but a
concise listing of notables would be much appreciated.
Just to clarify, NAPs or Internet
My apologies, allow me to make a clarification. When I mentioned NAPs,
I was referring more to provider peering policies _AT_ a NAP, rather
than a NAP's peering policies which of course as you pointed out would
be moot.
Being relegated to closed enterprise environments for the past few
years,
Greetings.
I was hoping someone could point me in the direction of provider/NAP
prefix filtering policies. Most important to me is UU and Cogent, but a
concise listing of notables would be much appreciated.
Jade E. Deane
perhaps this would be helpful.
2. EOF is not a RIPE NCC activity.
actually, it is. but it did not used to be.
randy
You can state what you like, but the income from the NCC is
what mostly funds the other RIPE activities, in which case
its all the same to me, does the EOF live on a RIPE.NET server?
Yes. Who funds those servers?
more to the point, who decided meeting content? essentially daniel
karrenberg
: The NOG philosophy don't work in Europe.
: simply not true. Check out SwiNOG http://www.swinog.ch/
:
: And there's NordNOG.
Anyone got a list of all english language NOG mailing lists? So far I
have AFNOG, SwiNOG (apparently some in english) and SANOG.
Thanks,
scott
: The NOG philosophy don't work in Europe.
: simply not true. Check out SwiNOG http://www.swinog.ch/
: And there's NordNOG.
Anyone got a list of all english language NOG mailing lists? So far I
have AFNOG, SwiNOG (apparently some in english) and SANOG.
NZNOG
Hi,
I've been to
previous NANOG meetings and have found them to be very useful. Can someone
shed some light for me on the ARIN meetings? I guess I want to know if it
worth attending? ARIN folks - please be kind...
:)
PLEASE REPLY
OFF-LIST.
Thanks,
Charlie
At 10:36 13/09/2004 -1000, Scott Weeks wrote:
Anyone got a list of all english language NOG mailing lists? So far I
have AFNOG, SwiNOG (apparently some in english) and SANOG.
My little list includes:
NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, JANOG, EOF, APOPS, SGNOG, NZNOG, NordNOG, SwiNOG, PACNOG
So, North America,
/20040913/lead/lead7.html
RGDS
GARY
- ---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 03:26:09PM -0700, Charlie Khanna - NextWeb wrote:
Hi,
I've been to previous NANOG meetings and have found them to be very useful.
Can someone shed some light for me on the ARIN meetings? I guess I want to
know if it worth attending? ARIN folks - please be kind...
Can someone shed some light for me on the ARIN meetings? I guess
I want to know if it worth attending?
wanna watch sausage being made? but the arin sausage factory has
become far less scary than apnic's or ripe's, by a long shot.
randy
If you're sniffing one gigabit port from a switch with much higher
bandwidth, you're going to lose something. Our primary sensor sits on
an aggregation switch just prior to hitting the net, and we have a 2Gb
fast etherchannel span port defined and lose relatively little in terms
of packet
Now, we do try to monitor some things like that. We have several crons
running checking the number of entries in the arp tables of our CPE
devices at customer locations, as well as several crons dedicated to
specific tell-tale signs of various worms and virii.
One that helped out a lot recently
Joe Johnson wrote:
Now, we do try to monitor some things like that. We have several crons
running checking the number of entries in the arp tables of our CPE
devices at customer locations, as well as several crons dedicated to
specific tell-tale signs of various worms and virii.
Our list of
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2004/09/11/stories/2004091102660400.htm
ISPs may be stopped from offering private leased line services
Thomas K. Thomas
New Delhi , Sept. 10
INTERNET Service Providers (ISPs) are in for a major setback with the
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)
40 matches
Mail list logo
