Here is a photograph of a unnamed Internet provider's data center
in Virginia after the tornadoes on Friday.
http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/images/misc/tornado02.jpg
Although most folks will be able to figure out who it is, for whatever
reason the service provider doesn't want their name used.
Yes, it does, thanks. Looks like we are going with 1483..
Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
Matt,
I don't remember seeing PPPoA in the 11.0 firmware. Hope this helps.
Christopher
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Hess
Sent: Sunday, September
Chris,
I am hoping to learn from the great pool of experience on this list.
We currently have 2 OC3 connections going to 2 seperate providers. We
are using netflow statistics to balance our traffic flows (which
outgoing is our major concern). Flow tools, snmp output, some custom
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/20/business/20phone.html?th
MCI, the troubled telecommunications company, has quietly begun
shopping itself to potential buyers, executives involved in the sale
process said yesterday.
Does anyone know of one?
Hell, has anyone even considered starting one?
For that matter, would anyone be interested or willing to pay for their
services if someone did or is bandwidth so cheap that it's just not
needed anymore?
...rdc
I am having a problem witha DS3 that terminates into a
Adtran CSU (T3SU-300) and then into a 7200 with HSSI.
I can not ping with a data pattern and I
experience packet loss and errors when I pass TCP
traffic.
Adtran recommended an attenuator.
What is the issue here? Is the signalling
This just made reuters:
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=internetNewsstoryID=6281153section=news
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine) [Mon 20 Sep 2004, 17:33
CEST]:
This just made reuters:
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=internetNewsstoryID=6281153section=news
Made BBC too: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3672242.stm
Nothing new much
--On 20 September 2004 07:56 -0700 Philip Lavine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am having a problem witha DS3 that terminates into a
Adtran CSU (T3SU-300) and then into a 7200 with HSSI.
I can not ping with a data pattern and I
experience packet loss and errors when I pass TCP
traffic.
Adtran
We are looking into deploying the L2 broadcast/multicast limits on the ethernet ports offoundry switches.
If anyone has case study or deployed it or any experience and don't mind sharing , will be very appreciated.
Regards
KS
To all,
I tried the attenuator and they failed to provide any
relief.
Philip
--- Alex Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 20 September 2004 07:56 -0700 Philip Lavine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am having a problem witha DS3 that terminates
into a
Adtran CSU (T3SU-300) and then
If I where to connect to SIAC thru a SONNET ring who's
would it be? Is it private or public?
--- R. Benjamin Kessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've setup a highly-redundant connection for one of
my clients (equipment in
two different access-centers in two different
cities).
What are you
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Rick Chavez wrote:
Does anyone know of one?
No but would probably be interested as a customer.
Hell, has anyone even considered starting one?
Possibly.
For that matter, would anyone be interested or willing to pay for their
services if someone did or is bandwidth so
More clues. It seems that everytime I ping with the
pattern the controller counter:
rx_soft_overrun_err=27473, increments.
Philip
--- Tim McKee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is most likely a framing or line-encoding
mismatch, such as B3ZS vs
PLCP on the physical DS3 or M13/M23 vs
Does anyone know of one?
No.
Hell, has anyone even considered starting one?
No, and I doubt anybody seriously has. As a former employee, I can vouch
that the transponder costs were prohibitive to any start-up. It's
possible that a large established provider might be able to absorb the
--On 20 September 2004 10:50 -0700 Philip Lavine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
More clues. It seems that everytime I ping with the
pattern the controller counter:
rx_soft_overrun_err=27473, increments.
If you admin both ends, enable scrambling.
Alex
FYI,
There seems to have been a momentary power loss at Telehouse @ 25
Broadway.
Initial reports indicate that there was some form of UPS failure that
has since recovered, impacting some or all of the 5th floor; PDU 400.1
seems to have been one of the impacted devices.
Regards,
- Tim
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Rick Chavez wrote:
Does anyone know of one?
Hell, has anyone even considered starting one?
For that matter, would anyone be interested or willing to pay for their
services if someone did or is bandwidth so cheap that it's just not
needed anymore?
Hadn't it gotten to
Hadn't it gotten to the point shortly before Cidera folded that the
satellite bandwidth was so insufficient for a full feed that it was of
questionable value?...or was it still fine if you wanted a usenet feed
with no binaries?
Probably. Yes.
IIRC, a full feed of usenet (3 years ago) was
Thanx Arien
Yes that's the command we will be doing.
The basic purpose is to stop the cpu's to shoot up to 70 + % utilistaion and to crash/reboot as we experienced the same.
What numbers you are using for 10/100/1000 ports.
rgds.
KSArien Vijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 2004, at 6:25
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Rick Chavez wrote:
Does anyone know of one?
Hell, has anyone even considered starting one?
For that matter, would anyone be interested or willing to pay for their
services if someone did or is bandwidth so cheap that it's just not
needed anymore?
People still use
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Tim Yocum wrote:
Hrmmm, does anyone know offhand where NYIIX is fed from?
-Dan
FYI,
There seems to have been a momentary power loss at Telehouse @ 25 Broadway.
Initial reports indicate that there was some form of UPS failure that has
since recovered, impacting some or all of
jason == jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jason Probably. Yes.
jason IIRC, a full feed of usenet (3 years ago) was approx 250GB+
jason per day. The overwhelming majority of that was multi-part
jason binaries. Cut them out and you should have plenty of room
jason across the transponder,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 03:15:47PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
Hadn't it gotten to the point shortly before Cidera folded that the
satellite bandwidth was so insufficient for a full feed that it was of
questionable value?...or was it still fine if you wanted a usenet feed
with no binaries?
On Sep 20, 2004, at 9:32 PM, KASHIF SALAMM wrote:
Thanx Arien
Yes that's the command we will be doing.
The basic purpose is to stop the cpu's to shoot up to 70 + %
utilistaion and to crash/reboot as we experienced the same.
What numbers you are using for 10/100/1000 ports.
We use it
VeriSign will add support for accessing the com/net zones using IPv6
transport on October 19, 2004. On that day, records for
a.gtld-servers.net and b.gtld-servers.net will be added to the root
and gtld-servers.net zones.
We do not anticipate any problems resulting from this change, but
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, J.A. Terranson wrote:
remember exactly). The point is that the Usenet feed ended up throttled
at ~25mbps(?). If you don't care about binaries of various descriptions,
you can still stuff a full feed through a very small pipe (a pair of T1s
should be more than
- Original Message -
From: Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement?
Now...if there were napster for pr0n, then abpe would be unnecessary :)
there is: it's
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 20 14:37:38 2004
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement?
Hadn't it gotten to the point shortly before Cidera folded that the
satellite bandwidth was so insufficient for a full feed that it was of
questionable
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Majdi Abbas wrote:
I'll bite, and reveal my ultimate cluelessness here.
Assuming I wanted to go about setting up an NNTP server, how would I go
about getting and maintaining the feeds? There's no central authority
AFAIK, but does anyone have any knowledge as to relative
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
People still use usenet? ;)
yes.
Seriously though, you'd have to be an awfully large organization for
outsourced news to not be a slam dunk financially.
Perhaps, but Panix runs their own; one of the many reasons
they get my
On Sep 20, 2004, at 7:54 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Majdi Abbas wrote:
I'll bite, and reveal my ultimate cluelessness here.
Assuming I wanted to go about setting up an NNTP server, how would I
go about getting and maintaining the feeds? There's no central
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 10:36:16AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
If I where to connect to SIAC thru a SONNET ring who's
would it be? Is it private or public?
They use any provider (Verizon, MCI, ATT and ConEd Comm.), however
ConED Comm. is their primary backbone provider. So, here's how you
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Majdi Abbas wrote:
Jon, I recall some reported problems along those lines. That
even without binaries, they were running out of overhead. Given that
USENET volume tends to grow, I'm betting that it would require a lot
more capacity now.
We were customers up
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004, Matthew Crocker wrote:
First, you go out and buy the biggest server you can find, buy more
drive space than you can afford. Then, buy more. You *may* be able
to get a feed from your upstream service providers. You'll want to
have at least 2 feeds and you should
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
VeriSign will add support for accessing the com/net zones using IPv6
transport on October 19, 2004. On that day, records for
a.gtld-servers.net and b.gtld-servers.net will be added to the root
and gtld-servers.net zones.
We do not anticipate any
36 matches
Mail list logo
