If there is someone on here that is responsible for e.root-servers.net
and if that person could ping me off list I'd appreciate it, thanks.
--On 15 November 2004 17:24 -0800 Owen DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASNs issued today are subject to annual renewal.
ARIN ASNs only?
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: EFF whitepaper
--- snip ---
Collateral damage is unacceptable, period.
Oh, I most certainly agree -- but then again, since nobody is being
Paul G wrote:
with that said, this is quite possibly off-topic to nanog. i'd second the
request earlier in the thread to move it to somewhere more appropriate.
politechbot for instance .. lovely place to discuss this sort of thing.
http://seclists.org/lists/politech/2004/Nov/0026.html
--
suresh
http://www.india-gii.org/wiki/index.php/Position_Papers/VPN_Tax
From Www.india-gii.org
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/923746.cms DoT to dash hopes of
virtual private network ISPs MANOJ GAIROLA
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2004 11:58:11 PM] NEW DELHI: Standalone ISPs,
I need some recommendations on bullet proof enterprise grade web
hosting. Nothing fancy as the back end is run from our locations. Off
list is fine. Thanks,
Matt
'bullet proof' as in mission critical - not as in spam. Couple people
have pointed this out to me. Sorry for the confusion.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Bazan
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL
I apologize for asking on the NA list (this is the only one I am one), but
I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations of a good hosting site in
central Europe (Amsterdam is great!)...
Looking for basic space sold by the rack (+ bandwidth) with limited on site
support (power backup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Airhart) writes:
I apologize for asking on the NA list (this is the only one I am one), but
I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations of a good hosting site in
central Europe (Amsterdam is great!)...
Looking for basic space sold by the rack (+
Hi All,
Can people make a quick check the for DDoS attacks on 209.220.100.158 in
the last 12 hours (to 00:00 17th Nov 2004 GMT+0) - I am trying to get
the exact time it appeared to occur, however I suspect it was in the
time period of 13:00-14:00 16th Nov 2004 GMT+0 which coincided with the
I guess it depends on how you define a VPN over just a private network.
Is an SSH tunnel a VPN? What about an encrypting SOCKS proxy?
DJ
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
http://www.india-gii.org/wiki/index.php/Position_Papers/VPN_Tax
From Www.india-gii.org
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:51:12PM -0600, Michael Airhart wrote:
I apologize for asking on the NA list (this is the only one I am one), but
I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations of a good hosting site in
central Europe (Amsterdam is great!)...
Looking for basic space
Deepak Jain [16/11/04 18:15 -0500]:
I guess it depends on how you define a VPN over just a private network.
Is an SSH tunnel a VPN? What about an encrypting SOCKS proxy?
This tax is aimed at a few Indian ISPs that are making lots of money
selling managed IP-VPN services.. the incumbent
the verisign gang gave a good presentation of Life and Times of
J-Root at the recent nanog meeting' see
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0410/pdf/kosters.pdf.
on foils 27 to 29, they reported non-trivial routing jitter and
therefore suggested DO NOT RUN anycast with stateful transport.
on the
I doubt that the participants in this discussion who are getting
so huffy about the EFF position are ready to tolerate a
situation where unknown third parties can arbitrarily block
any email they send or receive, without informing them,
regardless of content.
Think about how that maps to the
http://cwidc.com/JP/EN/news_events/media_center/2004/02_04_2004_16.html
Says they're offering managed IP-VPN QoS besides other stuff like data
center hosting, ATM, frame relay etc.. I'm sure they're going to be
really happy with the proposed tax on managed VPN providers in India.
srs
--
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Doesn't this in theory mean any isp who hands you any pipe that you can
slap a linksys VPN router on is also liable? Where does it begin? When
it's the ISP who provides the router? What about colo? Isn't a dedicated
box (with
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Doesn't this in theory mean any isp who hands you any pipe that you can
slap a linksys VPN router on is also liable? Where does it begin? When
it's the ISP who provides the router? What about colo? Isn't a
dedicated box (with KAME/Ipsec/OpenVPN/etc) enough
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Doesn't this in theory mean any isp who hands you any pipe that you can
slap a linksys VPN router on is also liable? Where does it begin? When
it's the ISP who provides the router? What about colo?
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
reference discussions about blocking VOIP from earlier this week (last
week?) gov'ts sometimes are made to put in place dumb laws that can not be
enforced in order to intimidate people and try to maintain the business of
legacy/incumbent carriers :(
CW being a legacy /
sanog cfp
srs
Original Message
Subject: [SANOG] SANOG V - 6 Feb - 13 Feb, 2005, Dhaka, Bangladesh -
Call for Presentations
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:36:33 +0800
From: Ananth Nagarajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SANOG V- (South Asia
As a followup for those interested:
Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Can people make a quick check the for DDoS attacks on 209.220.100.158
in the last 12 hours (to 00:00 17th Nov 2004 GMT+0) - I am trying to
get the exact time it appeared to occur, however I suspect it was in
the time period of
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
reference discussions about blocking VOIP from earlier this week (last
week?) gov'ts sometimes are made to put in place dumb laws that can not be
enforced in order to intimidate people and try to maintain
23 matches
Mail list logo
