Does anyone have a contact @ The World?
They are not listed in Jared's NOC list nor do postmaster@ or
mailer-daemon@ seem to have a human behind the wheel.
As an aside, they send one of the most annoying spam-receipt-auto-ack's
I've ever seen and the fact that you can't even reply to it is even
I am working on a solution that will require my CBX-500 to do
transparent mode and not translation mode. I've grepped the docs I have
and looked on the web and can't find reference to which mode the CBX
uses. This cross connect would be between the FR 3/1 card to the ATM DS3
card. Does anyone know
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 18:54:36 GMT, Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Slightly off-topic, but some operational relevance.
>
> Taking a cue from a snippet on /.
>
> http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/FL14Ad02.html
>
You might want to take a look at the APCAUCE track at APR
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:58:37 -0500, Mike Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, has anyone used the GFI email archiver for exchange server? Does
> > anyone have thoughts as to other software that is similar to this
> > product? What abo
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:58:37 -0500, Mike Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, has anyone used the GFI email archiver for exchange server? Does
> anyone have thoughts as to other software that is similar to this
> product? What about software for linux email archiving? We are
> starting to
>
> On Monday, 2004-12-13 at 22:51 PST, "David A. Ulevitch"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does anyone have a contact @ The World?
>
> Have you tried http://www.theworld.com/about/contact.shtml ? (I haven't.)
My abuse desk was simply trying to reply to their email. It's not our job
to hunt d
On Monday, 2004-12-13 at 22:51 PST, "David A. Ulevitch"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a contact @ The World?
Have you tried http://www.theworld.com/about/contact.shtml ? (I haven't.)
Tony Rall
So, has anyone used the GFI email archiver for exchange server? Does
anyone have thoughts as to other software that is similar to this
product? What about software for linux email archiving? We are
starting to look at this for some clients and thought the NANOGers might
have some input. Feel f
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > 171 uk.zone
>
> Everything is in subdomains like co.uk, so there is no point in
> blocking zone transfers for the TLD.
For the same reason, it is perfectly normal to
$ dig @.root-servers.net. . axfr
--
-- Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> Correct on 'knee' but for crying out loud, follow the pointy clicky
> references to the website. Of course there isn't going to be a curve
> in email [you want ascii plots? how 1980s], but the email quite
> clearly points you the way to the site where there is some analysis
> of the raw data.
ISP's aren't required to register in Puck's database.
How about trying abuse@ ?
-M
---
Martin Hannigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verisign, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon Dec 13 22:51:56 2004
Subject:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I see a periodic problem with some email servers that report "User
> Unknown" for valid users. The most recognizable problematic host is
> hotmail.com, but there usually are others mixed in (today's additional
> problematic hosts included
Hi all,
I see a periodic problem with some email servers that report "User
Unknown" for valid users. The most recognizable problematic host is
hotmail.com, but there usually are others mixed in (today's additional
problematic hosts included msn.com, verizon.net, and incentre.net).
Here is one o
On 13 Dec 2004, at 15:27, Steve Gibbard wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Simon Waters wrote:
Inspection suggests that the anycast announcements in the UK were
pointing to a server that wasn't accepting email.
I believe here the problem is using anycast, and not providing a
backup
system not using anyc
The article reinforces the empirical findings from some spam mapping work we've
been doing. Part of that work has been putting together a spammer social
network based on collaborations and partnerships between different spammers.
While the vast majority of spammers are based in the US there
www.bl.uk?
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Sent: 14 December 2004 09:52
To: Gadi Evron
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: [Fwd: zone transfers, a spammer's dream?]
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:52:38AM +0200,
Gadi Evron
--On 14 December 2004 10:17 + Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
171 uk.zone
www.bl.uk?
All bar the 171 lines :-) (.uk itself contains some legacy including
bl.uk, govt.uk etc.).
Alex
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Simon Waters wrote:
> Inspection suggests that the anycast announcements in the UK were
> pointing to a server that wasn't accepting email.
>
> I believe here the problem is using anycast, and not providing a backup
> system not using anycast. The previous case I'm aware of w
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:52:38AM +0200,
Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 174 lines which said:
> 171 uk.zone
Everything is in subdomains like co.uk, so there is no point in
blocking zone transfers for the TLD.
[I'm wearing my asbestos gloves.]
Is anyone out there in need of a 4-way interconnect between T640 nodes
for production IP networks? Is this a silly question? A few months back,
we all discussed how the CRS-1 from Cisco was largely aimed at folks who
were spending other people's money -- resear
Slightly off-topic, but some operational relevance.
Taking a cue from a snippet on /.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/FL14Ad02.html
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:08:39PM -0500, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2004, at 6:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [my attribution clipped -jzp]
> >>- this month, another knee was at 150k [Dec 4th] and similarly
> >> garbled results came out. Again, no response.
> >>...in this one year
Nice resource from Cisco for BGP
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm
Kashif Salam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Irwin Lazar
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 13, 2004, at 6:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- this month, another knee was at 150k [Dec 4th] and similarly
garbled results came out. Again, no response.
...in this one year we've seen the shape of the climb return to the
curve characterized by two years 99-01. Going for e? I'm not quit
What kind of issues have you guys seen?
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 21:59:04 -0500, Eric Kagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have seen a few strange drop outs, nothing I could put my finger on but
> enough to be annoying.
>
> Eric
>
> Eric Kagan
> Access Northeast
> 508-281-7600 x204
> [EMAIL PRO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The network itself is the primary contact information
for a domain. Every nameserver has an IP address
whose connectivity can be tracked through the network.
Same thing for mail servers and anything else with
an A record. This means that operationally it is
far more importa
More on BGP table size and the number of fragmentary
announcements in the Internet
http://www.tm.uka.de/idrws/2004/contributions2004/IDRWS2004--04--Huston_Geoff--Allocations_and_Advertisements.pdf
This is Geoff Huston's presentation at the Inter-Domain
Routing Workshop in May 2004. Slides for all
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Thomas Graham wrote:
hey all, my connection is 10mbit VDSL line, during these two months,
my upload speed to EU and US are very damn slow, average speed is
around 7KBytes/sec, does anyone feel free to try to find out what's
going on ? at first, I was suspect that problem might
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Interesting how many companies are "parked" at a lawyers office,
> i.e. the official address of the company is that of it's legal
> firm. One wonders why an abuse organization would not use this same
> tactic and register a legal firm as the administrative contact.
H
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Alex Bligh wrote:
--On 13 December 2004 13:18 + Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
doesn't lock out traffic for such long periods of time.
Could it be that buffers and flow-control over the 14ms third party leg
are causing the rate-limiting leaky bucket to continue
What did your isp say?
---
Martin Hannigan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verisign, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon Dec 13 01:55:56 2004
Subject: how could I find out the problem source on broadband connection?
Thomas Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hey all, my connection is 10mbit VDSL line, during these two months,
> my upload speed to EU and US are very damn slow, average speed is
> around 7KBytes/sec, does anyone feel free to try to find out what's
> going on ? at first, I was suspect that pro
--On 13 December 2004 13:18 + Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
doesn't lock out traffic for such long periods of time.
Could it be that buffers and flow-control over the 14ms third party leg
are causing the rate-limiting leaky bucket to continue to overflow long
after it's full?
Or y
Hi,
Just a quicky. We've got leased line out to a remote site that's pretty
much at capacity for remote to local site traffic, and from time to time
it appears to lock up for periods of 30 seconds or more.
Investigating it appears we outbound traffic shape, and ingress rate-limit
at the 'local'
Completely possible.
- ferg
-- Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could it be that buffers and flow-control over the 14ms third party leg
are causing the rate-limiting leaky bucket to continue to overflow long
after it's full?
Sam
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Archit
> - this month, another knee was at 150k [Dec 4th] and similarly
> garbled results came out. Again, no response.
> ...in this one year we've seen the shape of the climb return to the
> curve characterized by two years 99-01. Going for e? I'm not quite
> sure what the current point of the rep
> So my view of it is the same as current practice and laws (at least in
US)
> which require business (including DBA) registrations in county/state
> registrar and requirying and making public corporate records, including
> address of the company and list of its officers.
Interesting how many
hey all, my connection is 10mbit VDSL line, during these two months,
my upload speed to EU and US are very damn slow, average speed is
around 7KBytes/sec, does anyone feel free to try to find out what's
going on ? at first, I was suspect that problem might caused by GBLX,
but after one of the engi
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:50:20 +, Simon Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Inspection suggests that the anycast announcements in the UK were pointing to
> a server that wasn't accepting email.
>
First I've heard of Verizon using anycast
Or do you mean anycast lookups of .net were broken f
On Friday 10 Dec 2004 5:26 pm, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> When an incoming SMTP connection is made to one of Verizon's MX's, they
> allow it to proceed until the putative sender is specified, i.e. they
> wait for this part of the SMTP transaction:
I don't think this is the issue, as we aren't getti
40 matches
Mail list logo
