long as path games - additional question

2005-02-01 Thread Gniewomir Krol
hello there, perhaps it's trivial question ( if so, please give mi direction to some source of information); suppose i've received as-path which contains about 8 as-numbers, four of which are the same; what exactly this could mean? thanks in advance, best regards, gk

Re: Qwest outage in CA?

2005-02-01 Thread Richard J. Sears
Hi Brandon - We had no problems with our Qwest connection at all yesterday. On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:30:55 -0700 Brandon Shiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anybody noticing problems reaching the Qwest network? It appears to me that Qwest is having major issues right now, just wondering

Re: long as path games?

2005-02-01 Thread Blaine Christian
so, 'dumb' but not 'invalid'... There might very well be networks (say not on the internet) where as-paths longer than 100 might be required. Saying: they are invalid isn't correct. Saying: The use of as-path longer than 100 on today's Internet isn't helpful is correct, or so say you and

RE: Vendor Vulnerability Release Problem

2005-02-01 Thread Hannigan, Martin
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Mathews Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:01 AM To: Hannigan, Martin Subject: Re: Vendor Vulnerability Release Problem On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote: Date: Tue, 01 Feb

RE: Vendor Vulnerability Release Problem

2005-02-01 Thread Jerry Dixon
Martin/NANOG, from US CERT OP's perspective we would welcome this discussion and want to participate if NANOG can add it to the agenda next go around. Unfortunately I wasn't able to personally participate in this NANOG event but my team was there and we value the feedback that was provided.

long as path games - additional question - CASE CLOSED ;)

2005-02-01 Thread Gniewomir Krol
hello there, thanks a lot for your support (public and private); now it looks clear for me; once again, thanks for your time; regards, gk

Verizon DSL email policy

2005-02-01 Thread doug
It appears that Verizon is blocking our mail server. Calls to the online DSL support center have produced a unique answer to each call. A sampling: there is no problem; customers with dynamic IP addresses can not use 3rd party email servers either to read or send mail; ditto but a universal

RE: Verizon DSL email policy

2005-02-01 Thread Dennis Dayman
Any clueful insights appreciated. Doug, I forwarded your email to the abuse team at Verizon. Someone should be in touch shortly. -Dennis ex Verizon abuse Dayman

Re: Verizon DSL email policy

2005-02-01 Thread doug
Thank you for several off-list replies. I was not clear. I did not mean this as a rant against Verizon, I was frustrated at getting any kind of answer. On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that Verizon is blocking our mail server. Calls to the online DSL support center

An Optical Revolution may be Undermining Carrier Viability

2005-02-01 Thread Gordon Cook
Here is an abstract of a study I have just completed. Enjoy. Optical Revolution Increases Obsolescence of Legacy Carrier Networks Highly Efficient Layer One and Two Optical Networks Will Spell End of the Road for ATT, Sprint MCI in Their Current Form Intelligent Acquisition Could Lead to

Re: Verizon DSL email policy

2005-02-01 Thread Tony Rall
On Tuesday, 2005-02-01 at 19:42 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that Verizon is blocking our mail server It may be related to this questionable policy: http://www.wired.com/news/ebiz/0,1272,66226,00.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19567-2005Jan18.html