Mike,
It seems to me they get paid to carry prefixes by their customers.
And their peers listen to the prefixes because they make
money by using those prefixes.
I'm sure this type of statement helps drug dealers to sleep at night! :-)
If the top 100 AS's de-aggregated and increased the
Commercial reasons? The traffic goes to the 32x/24 instead of
the /19.
If that's the reason why the table is growing so much then we
are all in deep deep trouble.
Neil J. McRae said the following on 12/02/2005 21:06:
The issue we see is
bad aggregation - the root cause is bad practise and processes
that manifest into bad aggregation. I would argue that
networks with poor aggregation are also networks that will tend to
have more routeing issues and other
Hi Philip,
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Philip Smith wrote:
Quite often many service providers are de-aggregating without knowing it. They
receive their /20 or whatever from the RIR, but they consider this to be 16
Class Cs - I'm not joking - and announce them as such to the Internet. I spend
a lot
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
this is getting into what i was implying earlier.. you have wider experience
than me - would you agree that most of the poor deaggregating is not
intentional
ie that they're announcing their '16 class Cs' or historically had 2 /21s and
dont
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Philip Smith wrote:
From my own Routing Report (due out in a couple of hours), a quick
glance shows that the vast majority of the increase comes from ASNs
assigned by ARIN (the ASNs from the other three registry regions show
minimal increase in announcements).
Duh! No
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Jon Lewis wrote:
I've personally dealt with a customer not too long ago who when we turned
them up was announcing 2 /20s, a /21, a /22, and several /23s and /24s all
deaggregated as /24s. Sprint and Qwest (their other upstreams at the
time) apparently had no problem
On Sat, 12 February 2005 14:58:42 +, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
From: Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] - would you agree that most of the poor deaggregating is not
intentional
ie that they're announcing their '16 class Cs' or historically had 2 /21s and
Think about someone
Alexander Koch wrote:
I am not sure doing it the Swisscom way (they filter a lot)
is the way to go, yet I would be curious how many routes
they currently carry for a full route set. Ah, here it is:
-
route-views.oregon-ix.netsh ip bg su | incl 3303
164.128.32.11 4 3303 3351176 140593 74037481
At 02:52 PM 2/12/2005, Fredy Kuenzler wrote:
Alexander Koch wrote:
I am not sure doing it the Swisscom way (they filter a lot)
is the way to go, yet I would be curious how many routes
they currently carry for a full route set. Ah, here it is:
-
route-views.oregon-ix.netsh ip bg su | incl 3303
I split my Routing Analysis based on registry region so that the
constituents of each region know what is going on in their area.
As you know registries offer training if their membership ask for it.
APNIC and RIPE NCC membership seem to ask for training other than just
how to be an LIR.
But
Hi Stephen,
Stephen J. Wilcox said the following on 13/02/2005 00:58:
that applies to medium and large providers
too reading this list - how often do they actually check what prefixes they are
sourcing, from my recent work at a couple of european IXes i had a number of
folks email me offlist as
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Alexander Koch wrote:
On Sat, 12 February 2005 14:58:42 +, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
From: Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] - would you agree that most of the poor deaggregating is not
intentional
ie that they're announcing their '16 class Cs' or
Until there's deep shame, or real financial incentive to not being
listed as a member of the dirty 30, nothing is going to happen in
terms of aggregation.
Unfortunately, an automated email going out to each of the dirty 30
weekly from the Cidr Report saying that their network again made the
14 matches
Mail list logo
