Re: nanog [really inspectors & MOV's]

2005-03-13 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > > Virtually all surge protectors have MOV - Metal Oxide Varisters - > > within. These are devices with s sharp knee on their Voltage vs > > Resistance curve. In other words, they do not conduct for a 120V > > level, but do at 200, sh

Re: nanog

2005-03-13 Thread Michael Loftis
--On Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:28 PM -0500 "Jay R. Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But note that the OP does not have a MOV issue; he has an inspector issue. His best answer there may be buying outlet strips that offer no surge protection. He likely will need to first pin the inspector down

Re: nanog

2005-03-13 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 06:12:46PM -0500, David Lesher wrote: > Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > Perhaps someone who knows EE can enlighten me? > > I'll try. > > The #1) is BS. #2) is true. > > If ANYTHING is, it's square waves. [Huh?] > > Virtually all surge pro

nanog

2005-03-13 Thread David Lesher
Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered: > > > > Perhaps someone who knows EE can enlighten me? I'll try. The #1) is BS. #2) is true. If ANYTHING is, it's square waves. [Huh?] Virtually all surge protectors have MOV - Metal Oxide Varisters - within. These are devices wit

Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs?

2005-03-13 Thread Daniel Senie
At 09:08 AM 3/13/2005, Josh Vince wrote: Here's what APC has to say about it: http://nam-en.apc.com/cgi-bin/nam_en.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=jTAq9iAh&p_lva=&p_faqid=1372&p_created=1010390400&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9ncmlkc29ydD0mcF9yb3dfY250PTM4NyZwX3NlYXJjaF90ZXh0PXN1cmdlIGludG8gVVBTJnBfc2VhcmN

Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs?

2005-03-13 Thread Mark Radabaugh
Perhaps someone who knows EE can enlighten me? Joe OK - my considered opinion as a BSEE is: It's a pile of BS designed to sell PDU's. "but do not efficiently distribute the power, meaning that some equipment may be deprived of the necessary amperage it requires to run properly" Yeah. Sure. Mark

Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs?

2005-03-13 Thread Joe Maimon
Josh Vince wrote: Here's what APC has to say about it: http://nam-en.apc.com/cgi-bin/nam_en.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=jTAq9iAh&p_lva=&p_faqid=1372&p_created=1010390400&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9ncmlkc29ydD0mcF9yb3dfY250PTM4NyZwX3NlYXJjaF90ZXh0PXN1cmdlIGludG8gVVBTJnBfc2VhcmNoX3R5cGU9MyZwX3Byb2Rfb

Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs?

2005-03-13 Thread Josh Vince
Here's what APC has to say about it: http://nam-en.apc.com/cgi-bin/nam_en.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=jTAq9iAh&p_lva=&p_faqid=1372&p_created=1010390400&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPTEmcF9ncmlkc29ydD0mcF9yb3dfY250PTM4NyZwX3NlYXJjaF90ZXh0PXN1cmdlIGludG8gVVBTJnBfc2VhcmNoX3R5cGU9MyZwX3Byb2RfbHZsMT1_YW55fiZwX3

Re: IRC bots...

2005-03-13 Thread Bill Nash
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, John Kristoff wrote: Tallying then just the TCP 6667 traffic, perhaps eliminating very short lived or small flows, should be a good indicator of IRC traffic usage, but tagging those as potential sources for problems may be Yes and no, in my experience. Depending on the drone, s