On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Chris Boyd wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2005, at 12:13 AM, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> > do you atleast have info about the packet
> > types/destinations/anything-useful ?
> >
>
> Netflow is showing a lot of 1500 byte packets, but many different
> destinations. It looks simil
On Apr 22, 2005, at 12:13 AM, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
do you atleast have info about the packet
types/destinations/anything-useful ?
Netflow is showing a lot of 1500 byte packets, but many different
destinations. It looks similar to gnutella traffic. Maybe just a lot
files to share and ou
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Chris Boyd wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 21, 2005, at 11:24 PM, Charles Cala wrote:
> > i've seen file sharing/p2p/spam bots set up like that.
> >
> > removed a few, the hard way.
> >
> > (un mounted the drives, set them up on another box, and cleaned them)
> >
> > what does the virus
On Apr 21, 2005, at 11:24 PM, Charles Cala wrote:
i've seen file sharing/p2p/spam bots set up like that.
removed a few, the hard way.
(un mounted the drives, set them up on another box, and cleaned them)
what does the virus scan turn up?
Don't know yet, as the support staff gone for the day at thi
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Chris Boyd wrote:
> Several machines on a resnet that I consult for have started spewing
> traffic--50Mbits/sec all the way up to line rate. We're working on
> discoing the affected machines and getting traffic characteristics.
Why new worm? What makes you think they're no
Several machines on a resnet that I consult for have started spewing
traffic--50Mbits/sec all the way up to line rate. We're working on
discoing the affected machines and getting traffic characteristics.
Anyone else seeing similar?
--Chris
Nathan Ward wrote:
>I'm trying to come up with a way to get a full BGP routing table in to
>my lab.
>I'm not really fussed about keeping it up to date, so a snapshot is fine.
>At the moment, I'm thinking about spending a few hours hacking together
>a BGP daemon in perl to peer with and record a t
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 05:06:27PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:47:36PM -0500, Mike Hyde wrote:
[ Sorry for the self-followup. ]
> > I was wondering what everyone does to load balance over multiple
> > bgp feeds. We currently have 5 bgp feeds with 2 providers. Do you
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:47:36PM -0500, Mike Hyde wrote:
> I was wondering what everyone does to load balance over multiple bgp
> feeds. We currently have 5 bgp feeds with 2 providers. Do you just
> randomly pick networks, or use something like netflow to try and
> pick the best path.
A lot of
I was wondering what everyone does to load balance over multiple bgp
feeds. We currently have 5 bgp feeds with 2 providers. Do you just
randomly pick networks, or use something like netflow to try and pick
the best path.
Mike
Andre summed it up nicely for me here. I suppose quagga's stability is
somewhat relative to the actual environment it's being used in. In our
case, it was a live environment with nearly 20 full routing tables in
constant flux (the usual table churn from various providers). We moved
on to someth
Nathan Ward wrote:
>I'm trying to come up with a way to get a full BGP routing table in to
>my lab.
>I'm not really fussed about keeping it up to date, so a snapshot is fine.
>At the moment, I'm thinking about spending a few hours hacking together
>a BGP daemon in perl to peer with and record a t
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:36:03PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> The only missing thing there [in OpenBGPD] is full filtering
> capabilities which are under development currently.
Oh, and other very basic things like IPv4-multicast, IPv6-unicast and
IPv6-multicast AFI/SAFI support.
Regards,
D
Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 21.04.2005 17:17 Reeves, Rob wrote
Quagga is great for smaller implementations, but it doesn't scale very
well. It eats up a lot of CPU, so once you hit a certain number of BGP
peers, it may start intermittently flapping BGP sessions, or even just
crash the bgpd process ent
I agree... I have around 75 peers on a box that actually does the routing
running quagga, and there appears to be no problem. My only issues have been
with version upgrades having bugs in them, but those problems are due to my
inadequate testing. I also utilize supervise scripts (daemontoo
On 21.04.2005 17:17 Reeves, Rob wrote
Quagga is great for smaller implementations, but it doesn't scale very
well. It eats up a lot of CPU, so once you hit a certain number of BGP
peers, it may start intermittently flapping BGP sessions, or even just
crash the bgpd process entirely.
For what numb
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nathan Ward writes:
>
>I'm trying to come up with a way to get a full BGP routing table in to
>my lab.
>I'm not really fussed about keeping it up to date, so a snapshot is fine.
>At the moment, I'm thinking about spending a few hours hacking together
>a BGP daemon i
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Nathan Ward
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:35 PM
> > To: nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: Getting a BGP table in to a lab
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to come up with a way to get a full BGP routin
Quagga is great for smaller implementations, but it doesn't scale very
well. It eats up a lot of CPU, so once you hit a certain number of BGP
peers, it may start intermittently flapping BGP sessions, or even just
crash the bgpd process entirely. Although, I don't recall whether or
not the newer
Hi,
Zebra is outdated, the successor is called quagga (at least on debian)
and is capable of providing most of the vendor C BGP features, though
MD5 autentication is still experimental I think. We used to push a
handful of BGP full feeds on our quagga router and it didn't stumble a
bit. OSPF also
20 matches
Mail list logo
